Spree at Wake Up America Tagged Me: SEO Tag

I have been tagged and I am not 100% sure exactly what it is, but I will follow the rules as Spree lists them. (Thank you Spree!)

Start tag: Thank the person who tagged you. Copy all below. Add your three posts to the list. List the blog name and url of those you tagged. Post and publish. Update with those that comment. (Leave SEO somewhere in your title for your piece so search engines can pick it up easily)

This is based on the SEO theory that links to posts inside your blog are more important than links to your home page. I have selected three posts I want to promote along with my site’s name. You will do the same thing. Keep it simple and spread our good work around to both share and build some ratings! Pick three posts that you feel are your best or those you simply want to promote. Your site name is listed with your 3 selected posts beneath. Once you have your post up: Add the sites and post links of the folks you tagged onto your post. Try to add the site and post links to anyone involved to maximize the effectiveness. Tag a minimum of 5 people! Try your best not to double tag people so it will spread better! Please actually read the posts from everyone so you can see some really good work from our beloved blogging friends! Make your title a little different from mine to avoid repetitive titles. Please try maintain some friendly updates to your post too.

Revellian dot com SEO Keywords For Beginners Content: The Kings Illegitimate Stepchild Tales of Blogger-X IllusionMariuca - Wishing On A Falling Star Love In Disarray In Love With A Dream The Good ClientMariuca’s Perfume Gallery Perfume Shopping Spree Defining Beauty In Full SplendourFirst Time Dad Homer Kidnapped Something Ends Good Night Sweetheart! Hello Basil!Speedcat Hollydale Page Rocket Boy in Hawaii - DC9 Speedcat’s Death Ride into Terror! The Boy Inside All MenLadyJava’s Lounge Are you a Genius?? The secret to a happy marriage I’ve got a twitch in my eyeCat Tales Sunday was Bathday Someone got locked in! When she’s sleeping….Being Woman - The Joy of Being One A Handbag Lunatic A Real Deal What makes you fat?Make Money Online Share Uploaded Files and Earn Fight Back against computer-security threats Earn Money 3 Ways with Shareapic ProgramRooms of My Heart Let’s Celebrate with Us Join Tribute to Dads Project 8 things that make who I am nowLife with the Two Crazy Dogs 35W Bridge Collapsed Survivor 10 Questions Traffic Violation - Bite Me!Attitude, the Ultimate Power Cookies Happiness is a Decision; Choose to be Happy Happiness Vs. Human NatureTerri Terri Quite Contrary Just How Immature Are We? Finding a Voice So Much More to See than the GameMoneys online what is stumble upon?what is service? How to make trafiic??? What is SEO???Emila’s Illustrated Blog Green Fashion CaptainAmel’s Realm In Memoriam On Trust and Relationship Marriage ReviewDutchcorner The Key Cellphones It’s all in the earsR Playground Friends101 Shy Blogger Soul MusicComedy Plus 911 Tribute - Never Forget Hillary Goes To Montana Anger ManagementPixyflick - Design & Geek Blogmas - Malaysia Free Wordpress Blog Service Maxtor Portable HDD made simple Wanna buy a Sony Vaio?Pixyflick - Design & GeekBlogmas - Malaysia Free Wordpress Blog Service, Maxtor Portable HDD made simple,Wanna buy a Sony Vaio?Journey with WaterLearnerSpiritual FacialLearn to SinkThe Pearl WithinJanice Ng The Loving Brothers I am a Gangster head !! These coke aint for drinking : Part IA Great Pleasure - It’s Award-licious!! My Sweetheart Chloe Three Sweet Ladies & MeNAFASG©™NAFASG Team Recognized As Helium’s Top 5% Best WritersBlogspot Tutorial : How to Change Blogspot Layout With Free TemplatesThe Couple’s Golden Key To Reconciliation Heart of Rachel I Believe in Serendipity Friendship and Dessert Patience, Hope and FaithDarlene of My Life,My World Our Wedding Anniversary MR.Big Heart of Mine Quilted Blankets , KK of MyGoodFinds : Starting your Own Business, Things to Keep in Mind for 2007, Kisses are Made Here,Let`s talk About Love…Time Travel:Who Wants To Be A Politician?I Surrender, Bank of America’s Latest Credit Card “Missed Due Date” Scam, Extreme Left Hijacking Local Democratic Party Chairs, Christians Fight Leftists With Blogroll

(I think this is where I am supposed to add three of my pieces, so here goes)

San Fran Nan Needs to be Excommunicated-Lip Service Catholic Refuses to Defend Faith
Wisdom From Ayn Rand-UPDATED and BUMPED
Democratic SCHIP Bull...Lies and Distortions

ADD YOURSELF HERE WHEN DONE BY LEAVING A COMMENT

End tag

I am going to tag 6 people because it says a minimum of five and I do not know who appreciates being tagged and who doesn't, so I am nailing six people and praying they don't mind.

Demediacratic Nation
ChicagoRay
Political Grind
The Pink Flamingo
Maggie's Notebook
American Truckers At War

There are many more just as deserving and I apologize for not adding all of them but this way I leave room for others, for the group I just picked, to name them.

Sphere: Related Content

Myth vs Fact-Part 117

Myth	Fact
Islam: Religion of peace.	59:13 Verily, you (believers in the Oneness of Allah - Islamic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear in their (Jews of Bani An-Nadir) breasts than Allah. That is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power of Allah).
Tafsir	Selflessness of the Ansar The False Promise of Support the Hypocrites gave to the Jews

Sphere: Related Content

San Fran Nan Needs to Be Excommunicated-Lip Service Catholic Refuses to Defend Faith

The first hour of yesterday's O'Reilly Factor covered this story--the more I heard, the more dismayed and angry I became. And I wasn't the only one-from the tone of the calls O'Reilly was receiving, gays and Catholics were also outraged by this.

Hold up--gays you say? Catholics I can understand, but gays? Yes--gays. Gays who are fed up with the antics of militant gays, gays who are trying to live their lives in peace and being lumped in the same category as the militants by association and simply because they have made the choice to live a gay life. Gays who are ASHAMED to even be linked, however peripherally, with militant gays.

Many are calling for the dismissal of the Archbishop by Rome and Rome's condemnation.

While I'm appalled at the desecration of the Holy Sacrament by the archbishop allowing these men to receive Communion (as Catholics, we believe the bread and wine are the actual Body and Blood of Christ), I think, as O'Reilly pointed out, the archbishop was caught off guard and possibly in a state of shock at the audacity of these men. I don't want to believe he purposely ignored his charge as the protector of the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus.

This is what happened.

One week after the Folsom sex fest (and a week after Pelosi decided the sex fest wasn't an insult to Christianity), these two men, billing themselves as "Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence" (one of the recipients of the proceeds of Folsom and a group dedicated to mocking nuns) received communion at the hands of Archbishop George Niederauer at Most Holy Redeemer Catholic Church in San Francisco. They were dressed as you see them in the picture at the top of this article.

According to WorldNet Daily:

AFTAH chief Peter LaBarbera explained that the "Sisters" are men who dress up in outlandish outfits and white make-up to mock Catholic nuns. They adopt sexualized names including "Sister Porn Again" and their motto is "Go forth and sin some more."

LaBarbera reported at this year's event one, "novice" was "Sister Bambi Dextrous" who wore a T-shirt with the slogan "Bottom for Jesus" referring to the act of homosexual sodomy.

The church, Most Holy Redeemer, already had a history of pushing homosexual activism in violation of Roman Catholic Church teachings, including granting permission to the "Sisters" to hold "Revival Bingo" games there where porn DVDs and sex toys were used as prizes.

So the church itself has a history of accommodating this particular group of militants. Do they accommodate them out of a sense of gay activism or do they accommodate the militants out of a sense of inclusion, misguided as that sense may be? According to the history of this particular church, it appears to be pushing the homosexual agenda. Not a good thing.

The teachings of the Church as an institution are: people should live [sexually] according to their station in life--if they are single, chastity is considered proper. If they are married, then concourse with their spouse and only their spouse. The teachings go further regarding homosexuality--simply stating to live chaste according to their station in life, as homosexual marriage is forbidden as an abomination to God and not in the nature God intended. It should be noted a single gay person is not discriminated against, merely exhorted to live as any other single Catholic--chaste.

When people had common sense and weren't offended by the least little thing, the Church's stand on the homosexual lifestyle didn't have to be spelled out so succinctly. Now it does. and, while the stand is no different than any other single Catholic, militant gays have gone out of their way to ridicule and besmirch anything holy in Christianity and Catholicism.

How does all this tie in with Pelosi? Pelosi is Catholic--at least a lip service Catholic. She advocates killing babies through abortion and feels sex fests such as Folsom don't demean Christianity. She expects to continue to receive Communion, even though she is in full knowledge of Church teachings. Because this is her home district of San Francisco, she turns a blind eye to the denigration of a good portion of her constituency, preferring to pander to the fringe elements.

Those fringe elements are, of course, the militant gays, Code Pink, the Cindy Sheehan's, the baby killers and anyone who ridicules Christianity. She panders to terrorism and heads of terrorist states. She wastes taxpayer time and money on ridiculous investigations and non-binding resolutions pandering to her fringe base (and has gotten NOTHING of merit accomplished).

Yet she expects credibility. How can she be credible? How can she be taken seriously?

Yes, while the church in question, Most Holy Redeemer, has accomodated the militant agenda in the past, I do believe Archbishop Niederauer was taken completely off guard in this instance. While he is a representative of Christ in this lifetime, he is only human. However, I would expect he would receive some censure from Rome and that is as it should be.

Pelosi, however, should be standing up for the rights of her constituents not to be continually insulted by the fringe elements she panders to. Pelosi is simply a lip service Catholic, like Kerry and Kennedy. The Church really needs to learn these three, while public figures, have no intention of practicing their faith or living according to the moral principles set forth therein. These three really need to quit calling themselves Catholic and admit they have no moral principles--leave the Church voluntarily since it's obvious the Church would rather redeem those who choose not to be redeemed rather than excommunicate them

The mayor of San Francisco needs to stand for the rights of his Christian community as well. Unfortunately, the fringe rules in San Fran and none of the politicians have the balls to stand up and say, enough is enough.

Well, I do--enough is enough. Condemn the actions of these "sisters", condemn the sex fests, condemn the actions of the few that are impacting the many. And for those Christians in San Fran, stand up and take a stand. Grow some spines and quit being ashamed of your beliefs. Screw political correctness-it's YOUR rights as Christians being trampled upon.

Read the whole WorldNet Daily article and follow the links therein.

Join the Christians Against Leftist Heresy blogroll sponsored by Faultline USA

Sphere: Related Content

Stop the ACLU! Weekly Roundup 10/07-10/12/2007

There is so much coming out of this site, I think it's best I link to the weekly articles and let you take your time absorbing all of the information. There's a lot going on we don't know about and we won't know about unless and until a site such as this informs us--we already know we can't depend on the MSM to relate the information to us, much less inform us in a non-biased manner. So, with that being said, here are the offerings for this week:

Articles:

Obamamessiah: Create a Kingdom on Earth
Are Democrats Ready to Cave in on NSA Legislation?
Supreme Court Rejects ACLU Case Against CIA
ACLU Moves to Make Deporting Illegals More Dangerous
Gunman Opens Fire at Cleveland High School
Allegation of Affair Rocks Edwards Campaign
ACLU Victory! Homeless and Mentally Ill Can Continue to Sleep On Streets Untreated
Ruth Bader Ginsberg Happy With Democratic Congress
Gore Wins Nobel Peace Prize


Videos:

Dobson: "If Rudy Wins the Pro-Life and Pro-Family Movement is Gone"
Rudy vs. Ron Paul on 9/11
Fred Thompson Puts Chris Matthews In His Place
How the ACLU and International Law Threatens Our Sovereignty
"God" Back on US Flag Documents
Huckabee: You Can Suck It Till You Die

Take a good look through all the articles and videos. A lot of good stuff here!

Sphere: Related Content

Does the Nobel Peace Prize REALLY Mean a Damn Thing Anymore?

Nobel Prize
n.

Any of the six international prizes awarded annually by the Nobel Foundation for outstanding achievements in the fields of physics, chemistry, physiology or medicine, literature, and economics and for the promotion of world peace. [Emphasis mine]

And:

Nobel Prize

Any of the prizes awarded annually by four institutions (three Swedish and one Norwegian) from a fund established under the will of Alfred B. Nobel. The will specified that awards should be given "to those who, during the preceding year, shall have conferred the greatest benefit on mankind." Since 1901, prizes have been awarded for physics, chemistry, physiology or medicine, literature, and peace; since 1969, a sixth prize, established by the Bank of Sweden, has been awarded in economic sciences. The Nobel Prizes are regarded as the most prestigious prizes in the world.

After Al Gore won his Academy award for his schlockumentary "An Inconvenient Truth" and the buzzing first started about the possibility of him winning the Nobel, anyone with any brains knew it was a foregone conclusion. That's NOT meant as a compliment.

Then he won the Emmy.

And, of course, now the Nobel.

The man is a whiner of the first order--first with his bawling about the 2000 elections and his ORDERING a Florida official to BREAK THE RULES in the vote counting, rules well established in that state's constitution. It took the Supreme 9 to shut him the hell up and we're still hearing how Bush "stole" the election.

Then his quavery voice on his latest Chicken Little "The Sky is Falling" crusade.

Trouble is, his film is not scientifically credible. Global warming is not the catastrophic, impending doom he would like us to believe and what he has scare-mongered the weak minded into thinking, including Hollywood and anyone on the left. Of course, he has stooped to the "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" when any credible scientist has questioned his disaster of a movie, screaming the right has "bought them off".

Too bad he couldn't buy off the British government and court system. A british court ruled his movie represents "partisan political views" and requires a school disclaimer before being shown in schools.

From PRNewswire:

"Al Gore's movie, An Inconvenient Truth, represents 'partisan political views' and must be treated as such by teachers in British schools, a British High Court judge has indicated.

"The British court was swayed by numerous factual inaccuraciesportrayed in the movie.

Read the rest of the article here.

So, this year we have a whining loser from a presidential election
resorting to scare tactics to get some attention who has won an
Oscar, an Emmy and now the Nobel. Which leads to my question--
keeping in mind the definitions that led off this post and
looking at past Laureates, does this prize really mean a damn
anymore or has it become simply a political popularity contest?

Let's look at some of the previous winners
(from Nobel Peace Prize Winners 2007-1901):
1901:
Jean Henri Dunan (Founder of the International Committee of
the Red Cross, Geneva; Initiator of the Geneva Convention
(Convention de Genève)
Frederic Pass (Founder and President of the first French peace
society)

1906:
Theodore Roosevel  (President of the United States of America.
Drew up the 1905 peace treaty between Russia and Japan)

1912:
Elihu Root  (Former Secretary of State. Initiator of several
arbitration agreements)

1917:
International Committee of the Red Cross.

1919:
Thomas Woodrow Wilson  (President of the United States of America.
Founder of the Société des Nations (League of Nations)

1925:
Sir Austen Chamberlain  (Foreign Minister. Negotiator of the
Locarno Treaty)
Charles Gates Dawes  (Vice-President of the United States of America.
Chairman of the Allied Reparation Commission. Originator of
the Dawes Plan.)

1952:
Albert Schweitzer  (Missionary surgeon, Founder Lambaréné
Hospital in République du Gabon.)

1953:
George Catlett Marshall  (General, President American Red Cross,
ex-Secretary of State and of Defense, Delegate to the U.N.,
Originator of the Marshall Plan.)

1958:
Georges Henri Pire  (Belgium, Father of the Dominican Order,
Leader of the relief organization for refugees, l'Europe du Coeur
au Service du Monde.)

1962:
Linus Carl Pauling  (California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, CA. Campaigner especially for an end to nuclear weapons
tests.)

1964:
Martin Luther King, Jr  (leader of the Southern Christian
Leadership Conference, campaigner for civil rights.)

1975:
Andrei Dmitrievich Sakharov  (Soviet nuclear physicist.
Campaigner for human rights.)

1979:
Mother Teresa  (India, Leader of the Order of the Missionaries of
Charity.)

1983:
Lech Walesa  (Poland. Founder of Solidarity, campaigner for
human rights.)

1986:
Elie Wiesel  (U.S.A., Chairman of 'The President's Commission on the
Holocaust'. Author, humanitarian.)

EVERY ONE OF THE ABOVE WINNERS HAD SOMETHING TO
OFFER THE WORLD. EVERY ONE of the above were true examples of
the definition of the Nobel Prize Laureates.

It becomes more political here:
1973:
HENRY A. KISSINGER , Secretary of State, State Department,
Washington.
LE DUC THO , Democratic Republic of Viet Nam.
(Declined the prize.)
for jointly negotiating the Vietnam peace accord in 1973.

1977:
Amnesty International (London, Great Britain. A worldwide
organization for the protection of the rights of prisoners
of conscience.

1978:
Mohamed Anwar al-Sadat  (President of the Arab Republic of
Egypt.)
Menachem Begin  (Prime Minister of Israel.)
for jointly negotiating peace between Egypt and Israel.

1990:
Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbechev  (President of the USSR, helped to
bring the Cold War to an end.) What about Reagan, Pope John
Paul II and Margaret Thatcher???

1994:
Yasser Arafat  (Chairman of the Executive Committee of the
PLO, President of the Palestinian National Authority.)
Shimon Peres  (Foreign Minister of Israel.)
Yitzhak Rabin  (Prime Minister of Israel.)
for their efforts to create peace in the Middle East.

2001:
United Nations  (New York, NY, USA)
Kofi Anna (United Nations Secretary General)

2002:
James Earl Carter, Jr. (former President of the United States
of America, for his decades of untiring effort to find
peaceful solutions to international conflicts, to advance
democracy and human rights, and to promote economic and social
development)

These "laureates" are a rogue's gallery of simple political panderers.
Arafat? Gorbachev? Carter? Now, Gore.

Sadly, the Nobel is nothing more than a politically partisan,
completely anti-American popularity contest.

Gore no more deserves the Nobel for his scaremongering
pseudo-science than Arafat (terrorism), Kofi Annan and
Carter did.

Sad commentary on what was once a very "Nobel" idea.

Catch the Wave!

Sphere: Related Content