Combating Religious Hatred and Vilification

I had seen reports that the draft resolution on Combating Defamation of Religions had been edited to substitute vilification for defamation but I had not seen substantive details prior to last night.  One of my Google Alerts linked to an article which included a link to the amended resolution. 

   What is the big deal?  The State Department asserts that the USA rejects resolution on the basis of the concept of defamation of religions.  I presume that the edit is an attempt to throw a lifeline to Obamination.  Recall that while Obamination rejects defamation, he accepts negative stereotyping, which was substituted for defamation in the Freedom of Opinion and Expression resolution.  The OIC is tinkering with the semantics in hopes of sinning over some of the nay sayers and obstainers to their side. 

    None of the resolutions define the crucial terms, so I checked the on line dictionaries. A Google search turned up fifteen definitions of defamation.

• Seven definitions specify that the victim  is a person.
• Four definition specify that the statement must be false.
• Six definitions list slander as an element.
• Five definitions list libel as an element.
• Two definitions list calumny as an element.
• One of the definitions lists vilification as an element.
• Three of the definitions list malicious as an element.

    Next, I looked up vilification, receiving four results.

• Two definitions listed defamation as an element.
• One definition listed calumny as an element.
• One definition listed slander and libel as elements.

    Next, I looked up negative stereotyping , striking out. Removing the adjective resulted in fifteen definitions.  These are the best of the lot.

• A stereotype is a commonly held public belief about specific social groups, or types of individuals. The concepts of "stereotype" and "prejudice" are often confused with many other different meanings. ...
  en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereotyping
• stereotype - pigeonhole: treat or classify according to a mental stereotype; "I was stereotyped as a lazy Southern European"
• stereotype - a conventional or formulaic conception or image; "regional stereotypes have been part of America since its founding"
  wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

    To determine the meaning of those terms, as used in the resolutions, we must examine their context. 

• Stressing that defamation of religions is a serious affront to human dignity leading to the illicit restriction of the freedom of religion of their adherents and incitement to religious hatred and violence,

Who is defamed?  Is Islam a human person?  How does illustrating the cause--effect relationship of Islam to terrorism affront human dignity?  If Muslims find their dignity affronted by exposure of the truth about Islam, they can restore their dignity by converting to a pacifist religion.
   
    How does defamation lead to illicit restriction of freedom of religion?  The reference is obviously to the Swiss minaret ban and the French Burqa ban.  What do minarets have to do with freedom of religion?  In ancient times, they were watch towers. Muslims adopted them for the call to prayer. They also serve as a powerful symbol of Islamic supremacy.  But they are not mentioned in the Qur'an or hadith as religious requirements. 

    Visit Open Burhan to verify the literal translation and compare the other translations of 33:59. You can check the entry in an Arab/English dictionary to verify it.

• You, you the prophet, say to your wives and your daughters and the believers' women they (F) near (lengthen) on them from their shirts/gowns/wide dresses, that (is) nearer that (E) they (F) be known (better than being identified), so they (F) do not be harmed mildly/harmed, and God was/is forgiving, merciful.

If you want to know the real deal, read Sahih Bukhari 1.4.148. Its about Umar hassling Sauda, one of Moe's wives when she went out to answer a call of nature.

• 14. Reaffirms the obligation of all States to enact the legislation necessary to prohibit the advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, [Emphasis added.]
  

    That paragraph contains two key phrases which, when compared to certain relevant public statements, give us the final clue.

The Secretary-General is concerned over the controversy that has been created by the publication of the Danish cartoons.  He believes that the freedom of the press should always be exercised in a way that fully respects the religious beliefs and tenets of all religions.
http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2006/sgsm10334.doc.htm

In plain language, Kofi Annan would have prevented the publication of the cartoons if it was in his power. That is the power they are seeking.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:

“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

    The Secretarys General told us that the Danish Cartoons did not respect Islamic religious beliefs and that Geert Wilders' documentary constituted hate speech and incitement to violence.

The cartoon of greatest concern depicts Moe with a bomb in his turban, implying that he was a terrorist.  Moe never had a bomb because he died prior to the invention of gunpowder. But he was a terrorist, by his own admission:

• Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month's journey. [Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331, Emphasis added.]
• I have been made victorious with terror [ Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220, Emphasis added.]

The hate speech and incitement in Fitna come from the Qur'an and clerics, not from Geert Wilders.

    Lets get down to the real issue of defamation, negative stereotyping. ¶ 24 contains a 28 item enumerated list. The seventh item is of interest.

• 7. Expresses deep concern, in this respect, that Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism;

Fitna and the Motoons display that association; what is wrong with it?  Re-examine the quotes from Bukhari's collection of authentic sayings. Moe said that he won by terrifying his victims.  The Qur'an is not silent about this issue.

• 3:151. We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers).

We shall terrorize the disbelievers. Click the link and read the context, it is one of aggressive conquest. 

• 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, "Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes."

What did Allah say he would do?  What did he order the angels to do? After reading this appetizer from Tafsir Ibn Kathir, click the link and read the entire passage.

• Ar-Rabi` bin Anas said, "In the aftermath of Badr, the people used to recognize whomever the angels killed from those whom they killed, by the wounds over their necks, fingers and toes, because those parts had a mark as if they were branded by fire.''
• 8:57. So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson.

Compare the last clause in 8:57 to the last clause in 59:2.  The objective is to build a reputation for brutality; you will see the application in 59:13.

• [8:60]
  Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly.

Build the biggest army you can to strike terror.  What is the "cause of God"? [hint]  Now we get down to the practical application of those verses.

• 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.

  33:27. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things. 

What did Allah say he would do?  What did he do?  What resulted?  Moe and his army killed the men of one tribe and enslaved their widows and orphans. But, of course, Islam has no connection to terror and human rights violations. Its the religion of peace.

• 59:2. He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî An-Nadîr) from their homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from Allâh! But Allâh's (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with eyes (to see).

What did Allah do to the Bani An-Nadir?  What is the meaning of the admonition?  Can you relate that to the lesson of 8:57?

• 59:13. Verily, you (believers in the Oneness of Allâh - Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh. That is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power of Allâh). 

The Jews fear Muslims more than they fear Allah. Why is that?  Can you make the connections with 8:57 & 59:2?  How did Allah cast terror into their hearts?

    Those Muslims are supremely arrogant; they assume that we are ignorant, gullible fools who will believe anything if it is repeated with sufficient frequency. "Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism".  Islam's scripture and tradition inform us that the statement from ¶ 24.7 is an accursed lie. They want to base international law on that lie, criminalizing  revelation of the fact that it is a lie!

    The true source of Islamic blasphemy law is Reliance of the Traveller.  Observe the penalty for apostasy.

• o8.1

  When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.

  o8.2

  In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph (A: or his representive) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.

Apostates are killed. What acts warrant their death?  Reliance lists twenty, these are particularly relevant.

• o8.7: Acts that Entail Leaving Islam

  (O: Among the things that entail apostasy from Islam (may Allah protect us from them) are:

• -4- to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace);

  -5- to deny the existence of Allah, His beginingless eternality, His endless eternality, or to deny any of His attributes which the consensus of Muslims ascribes to Him (dis: v1);

  -6- to be sarcastic about Allah's name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat;

  -7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does belong to it;
  

  -16- to revile the religion of Islam;

  -17- to believe that things in themselves or by their own nature have any causal influence independent of the will of Allah;

  -18- to deny the existence of angels or jinn (def: w22), or the heavens;

  -19- to be sarcastic about any ruling of the Sacred Law;

  -20- or to deny that Allah intended the Prophet's message (Allah bless him and give him peace) to be the religion followed by the entire world (dis: w4.3-4) (al-Hadiyya al-`Ala'iyya (y4), 423-24). )

    How do those rules apply to us as disbelievers?  When disbelievers are conquered and subjugated as dhimmis under Islamic supremacy, they are obligated by a treaty of protection. That treaty is violated if they perform certain acts listed in Reliance. Guess what the penalty is.

• o11.10

  The agreement is also violated (A: with respect to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated that any of the following things break it, and one of the subjects does so anyway, though if the state has not stipulated that these break the agreement, then they do not; namely, if one of the subject people:
  

  -5- or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.

• o11.11

  When a subject's agreement with the state has been violated, the caliph chooses between the four alternatives mentioned above in connection with prisoners of war (o9.14). 

• o9.14

  When an adult male is taken captive, the caliph (def: o25) considers the interests (O: of Islam and the Muslims) and decides between the prisoner's death, slavery, release without paying anything, or ransoming himself in exchange for money or for a Muslim captive held by the enemy.

    When the resolution is voted out of the third committee and passed in the General Assembly, it will not have the force of law, but it will add unwarranted legitimacy to existing blasphemy laws which are used to persecute religious minorities in several Islamic nations.

    Unfortunately, that is not the real threat to our liberty. This is:  Ad Hoc Committee on the elaboration of complementary standards.  The cmte. will meet at the end of November for a week and a few days. Its purpose is to insert the resolution into ICERD through a binding protocol, giving it the force of  international law.  Last year, the cmte. bogged down in procedural matters. We have no way of knowing when it will finish its work, but when it does, we will be outvoted and the protocol will become law.

    Several blog posts about the ad hoc cmte. have been compiled.

• Ad hoc cmte Draft Document
• Ad hoc cmte on complementary standards:

    The resolution will be voted on in the cmte., the vote is expected to happen Monday or Tuesday.  The General Assembly vote should happen in December. Several human rights organizations are lobbying against it, but with little hope of success.   Besides signing the petition posted by Open Doors, there is not much we can do about it.

    Our best tactic is a counter attack: to raise the political cost of censoring us above Islam's threshold of pain.  As I showed you their egregious lie and proved it above, you can share that information with others.  Copy and cross post this blog post. Paste it into emails. Tell everyone who will listen about the injustice being perpetrated by the OIC. 

    Three international human rights covenants contain provisions which would, if enforced, require that Islam be proscribed by law.  The purpose of the International Qur'an Petition is to bring the vital facts to the attention of the public and the World Court. Please sign it and spread it. Cross post it on your blog or web site. Send it by email to  everyone you can hope to influence.

Sphere: Related Content

UN Abuse: Ahmadinejad Spews Feces

Thanks and a tip of the hat to   Dandelion Salad.  for posting videos and a transcript. I have taken quotes out of context interspersed with my commentary. Footnotes follow below the horizontal line.

In the Name of God, The Compassionate, the Merciful Oh God, hasten the arrival of Imam Al-Mahdi, Grant him good health and victory, and make us his followers and those who attest to his rightfulness.

    Ahmadinejad thinks it speaks for Allah. it also thinks that Allah, who is really an impotent idol, is God.  He implores his demon to give victory to the Mahdi. Perhaps you might ask yourself: "victory over whom"?   I have a clue for you: who does Ahmadinejad say it wants to conquer first and second?

Without security, human beings will never be able to fulfill their aspirations neither in material nor spiritual domains.

    `How long did it take Ahmadinejad to figure that out.  But he does not mean security for us, he means security or Muslims and victory over us.

Divine prophets, thinkers and people of good faith have always sought to guide human beings through having faith to God, and practicing diving teachings and injunctions which guarantee a peaceful and safe life in both worlds.

Divine prophets

    The reference is to Moe, who forced his ersatz faith on anyone who resisted it. ¹ The implication is that Jesus Christ did the same thing, and will continue on the war path when he returns. ²

peaceful and safe

    "...embrace Islam and you will be safe; embrace Islam and Allah will bestow on you a double reward. But if you reject this invitation of Islam, you shall be responsible for misguiding the peasants "³

From the viewpoint of divine prophets, a …. society, is a global society where the belief in the oneness of God is professed, and justice is proclaimed, a place where security, pure, friendship and brotherhood prevail under the leadership of the most noble servant of God together with Jesus Christ (P.B.U.H) and other dedicated people.

Tawheed

    [8:39]
And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in God altogether and everywhere; but if they cease, verily God doth see all that they do. [Abdullah Yusuf Ali] [Emphasis added.]  For the practical application of this verse see Reliance of the Traveller o9.9 ⁴  

friendship & brotherhood 

    The problem is that friendship & brotherhood are for Muslims only. ⁵

most noble servant

    Ahmadinejad makes Moe superior to Jesus Christ.  Remember, the devil is in the details.

Today, although countries allocate a major portion of resources to boost their national security, there is no sign of any improvement in the current circumstances or the shadow of threat predominating the international climate.

shadow of threat

    What threat?   What is the origin of current threats to security?  "Embrace Islam and you will be safe."  Get a clue.

 Regrettably, in spite of this vitally-crucial need, and because of the behavior of a few governments whose policies reflect a departure from the teachings of divine prophets, the threat of nuclear bombs continue to cast a shadow on the entire globe, where no one can feel safe. Some governments in their strategies introduce nuclear bombs an element of stability and security, a mindset which is based on fallacy and misleading argument. 

departure from the teachings of divine prophets

    Translation: they ain't Islamic-- the threat to security comes exclusively from kuffar.

Some governments in their strategies

    Iran: joining the nuclear club, gaining respect & prestige, getting rid of Israel.  Get a clue.

Look at the disastrous consequences of atomic explosions in Hiroshima and the use of depleted nuclear bombs in south Iraq. Nuclear arms are, therefore, a fire against humanity rather than a weapon for defense or offence.

    So why are you Hellbent on getting  them if they are so evil?  President Truman saved a few million lives and ended the war in the Pacific by dropping Little Boy & Fat Man.

fire against humanity

    Islamic law requires perpetual war against  pagans until they become Muslim,  Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians until they are subjugated and extorted   Islam is perpetual war against the rest of humanity.  ^4,6

Possession of nuclear weapons is not something to be proud of; rather it is ugly and ignominious. More ignominious is the threat to use such weapons, the specter and ramifications of which are in no way comparable with any crime committed in history.

not a source of pride

"In regard to the nuclear issue, you should regard the nuclearization of Iran as a bygone fact,"... "By God's grace, Iran has entered the world countries' nuclear club," ^₇

More ignominious is the threat

    "endanger your entire world" ⁷

In the mindset of divine prophets and devoted people and based on all humanitarian beliefs, superiority comes from devotion to moral principles, purity, humility and the desire to serve human kind, not from the power of suppressing others.

superiority : morality, not suppression

    3:110. You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind; you enjoin Al-Ma'rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh - and rebellious against Allâh's Command).

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Verse:--"You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind." means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam.  [Emphasis added.]

The policies aimed at bringing under control the entire world has clearly suffered a dramatic defeat, and the dreams of new empires will never come true.

world domination

    From the viewpoint of divine prophets, a …. society, is a global society where the belief in the oneness of God is professed, and justice is proclaimed, a place where security, pure, friendship and brotherhood prevail under the leadership of the most noble servant of God together with Jesus Christ (P.B.U.H) and other dedicated people.

    I hope that I am not the only one able to detect the internal conflict in  Ahmadinejad's damnable lies.

Instead of following the outdated course of the past, it is better to join to the mainstream of nations and independent governments on the solid foundation Instead of following the outdated course of the past, it is better to join to the mainstream of nations and independent governments on the solid foundation of human culture and logic.

join to the mainstream

human culture and logic.

    Translation: Islam.  Ahmadinejad is demanding that we submit to Islam.

This is for their own good and best interest’s future belongs to the nations, security, peace and justice shall prevail in the whole world with the help of the faithful under the leadership of the perfect human being. There will be no room in the future world for intimidation and arrogant powers.

for their own good

3:110. ...    And had the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh - and rebellious against Allâh's Command).

3:111. They will do you no harm, barring a trifling annoyance; and if they fight against you, they will show you their backs, and they will not be helped.

3:112. Indignity is put over them wherever they may be, except when under a covenant (of protection) from Allâh, and from men; they have drawn on themselves the Wrath of Allâh, and destruction is put over them. This is because they disbelieved in the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh and killed the Prophets without right. This is because they disobeyed (Allâh) and used to transgress beyond bounds (in Allâh's disobedience, crimes and sins).

    You might recall that 3:110 and a related hadith  were quoted previously, revealing how true believers are the best people as they drag us to Islam with chains on our necks.  That is "better for us" = " for their own good".   If you can't perceive the hypocrisy in the paragraph quoted above, it would be best if you remove yourself from the gene pool, we have  enough morons already.

The collective movement of the world nations aimed at launching major reforms based on monotheism and establishment of justice in international relations has begun.

monotheism

    Monotheism  Islam.

justice

    Justice  Shari'ah. ⁸

I hereby invite the esteemed President of the United States Mr. Obama to join this movement if he is still committed to his motto of change, since tomorrow would be too late.

join this movement

    This is dawah: the invitation to embrace Islam, a legal  condition precedent to attack.  "...provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice...."⁹

tomorrow would be too late

    Here we have the old fashioned high pressure sales pitch. "This offer is good for a limited time only."

    There is nothing more stupid than maundering about nuclear disarmament.  The jinn is out of the bottle and can not be recaptured.  There is no possibility of disarmament because it can not be verified. In any case, it would be  dynamic, not a static condition.  If  we disarm and our  enemies subsequently build nukes, we are screwed.  We can not accept that risk.

    Nuclear technology is dual use. The same centrifuge technology used to enrich  reactor fuel can enrich fissile material for explosives.  Nuclear reactors produce plutonium as a byproduct, a byproduct which can be used to make bombs.

    It appears that the transcript I relied upon was not complete.  Another offering includes the extremely offensive remarks about the accursed abomination.

First, the event of the II September 2001 which has affected the whole world for  almost a decade.  All of a sudden, the news of the attack on the twin towers was broadcast using  numerous footages of the incident.  Almost all governments and known figures strongly condemned this incident.
But then a propaganda machine came into full force; it was implied that the whole  world was exposed to a huge danger, namely terrorism, and that the only way to save  the world would be to deploy forces into Afghanistan.

condemnation of terrorism

    Totally irrelevant!  None of them condemn Islam nor its damnable doctrines which sanctify and mandate  global conquest, genocide & terrorism. ¹⁰
Who will stand and condemn the execrable words and actions of Allah and his messenger?  "I will cast terror"¹¹, "Allah cast terror." ¹²,  "I have been made victorious with terror."¹³

    Who will condemn 8:39 & 9:29 which command warfare against pagans and "people of the book"?.  Who will condemn Allah's demand for "great slaughter"?¹⁴

only way

    Invading Afghanistan is no solution.  Terrorism can only be ended by ending the existence of Islam.  Terrorism is an inseverable intrinsic sacrament of Islam.

It was said that some three thousands people were killed on the II September for  which we are all very saddened. Yet, up until now, in Afghanistan and Iraq hundreds of thousands of people have been killed, millions wounded and displaced and the  conflict is still going on and expanding.

    5:32 tells us that killing one person is as bad as killing all of mankind. The terrorists deliberately planned and carried out an attack which killed three thousand, hoping to kill fifteen times that many.  Absent that act, there would be no invasion of Afghanistan or Iraq.  The vast majority of indigenous casualties were caused by the acts of indigenous terrorists and their  Arab allies.

In identifying those responsible for the attack, there were three viewpoints. 1- That a very powerful and complex terrorist group, able to successfully cross all layers of the American intelligence and security, carried out the attack.  This is the main viewpoint advocated by American statesmen.

terrorist group

    They left a trail of evidence.  They should never have been allowed to enter this country. A traitor, President Clinton, weakened our security measures so that they were able to gain entry.   We have U.b.L. on video tape chortling about his success.  We have a confession by K.S.M. and four of his companions.  What more do we need?  

2- That some segments within the U.S. government orchestrated the attack to reverse the declining American economy and its grips on the Middle East in order  also to save the Zionist regime.  The majority of the American people as well as other nations and politicians agree with this view.

U.S. government orchestrated the attack

    The U.S. delegation walked out. They should have verbalized their objections. Shrub is not capable of creating and operating such a  conspiracy nor could it have been kept secret in an open society.  The accusation is idiotic and offensive in the extreme.

3- It was carried out by a terrorist group but the American government supported and took advantage of the situation. Apparently, this viewpoint has fewer proponents. The main evidence linking the incident was a few passports found in the huge volume of rubble and a video of an individual whose place of domicile was unknown  but it was announced that he had been involved in oil deals with some American  officials. It was also covered up and said that due to the explosion and fire no trace of the suicide attackers was found.

American government supported

    Blame the victims. AssWholliness in its purest form. I would bet that U.b.L. is in Iran, where his family is hiding.  The absurdity of these assertions cries out for a Boston stomping.

- Would it not have been sensible that first a thorough investigation should have been conducted by independent groups to conclusively identify the elements involved in the attack and then map out a rational plan to take measures against them?

investigation    

    We knew an attack was planned, we did not know the exact target, time, place and method.  We did know that it was planned by Muslims.  The rational plan for dealing with them is easy: nuke every Gd'd Islamic nation off the face of the earth and announce to the world "don't reed on me".  You all want to be Shahid, we should give you what you desire and deserve.

    Evidently you Muslims forgot that your canon of scripture tradition, exegeses & jurisprudence has been translated into our language and posted on the web.  Those of us who know what is happening and why are spreading that knowledge as rapidly and extensively as possible.

2- Assuming the viewpoint of the American government, is it rational to launch a classic war through widespread deployment of troops that led to the death of hundreds  of thousands of people to counter a terrorist group?  3- Was it not possible to act the way Iran countered the Riggi terrorist group who killed and wounded 400 innocent people in Iran. In the Iranian operation no innocent person was hurt.  

rational to launch a classic war

    No! Staging land invasions & occupations on the cheap is a fool's errand. Victory can only be achieved by eradicating Islam. There are two ways to do that, one of them is easier but less humane.  No attempt has been made to convert  the enemy away from the war cult which enslaves them and motivates their actions.  Every dollar and every drop of blood spent has been wasted because of that idiotic error.

terrorist group

    The terrorist group is Islam.  This war can not be won without eliminating Islam from the earth. Anything less than total eradication of the demonic doctrines which sanctify and mandate conquest, genocide & terrorism will be a miserable failure.  Islam is a real, proximate and persistent existential threat to civilization. When men believe that their eternal destiny depends on conquering the world, that they will go to Hell if they don't and to a celestial bordello if they  engage in jihad, nothing but death will stop them unless their faith in their demon is destroyed.  

innocent

   As far as Islam is concerned, only Muslims are innocent. all others are "rebels against Allah" who are "waging war against Allah"¹⁵  The punishments prescribed for them are set out in 5:33.

It is proposed that the United Nations set up an independent fact-finding group for the event of the II September so that in the future expressing views about it is not forbidden.

independent fact-finding group

    Is there anyone  so Gd'd stupid that they think that any such investigation would be impartial & objective?  The insult to our intelligence can not be ignored.

I wish to announce here that next year the Islamic Republic of Iran will host a
conference to study terrorism and the means to confront it. I invite officials, scholars,
thinkers, researchers and research institutes of all countries to attend this conference.

Iran will host a terrorism conference

    What is next?  Will the Mafia host a conference to investigate the cause of  bootlegging, prostitution and gambling rackets???  There is one and only one way to deal with terrorism: eliminate Islam from the world.

Second, is the occupation of the Palestinian territories

Palestinian territories

    Its Israel, stupid! "Palestine" is a Gd'd lie!  It is a linguistic corruption of a Roman attempt to rename Israel after the Philistines as an insult after they suppressed a rebellion.  Jews, not Arabs are the indigenous people of Israel. ¹⁶

The oppressed people of Palestine have lived under the rule of an occupying regime for 60 years, been deprived of freedom, security and the right to selfdetermination, while the occupiers are given recognition.

oppressed people of Palestine

    Palestinians lived under Roman occupation until 638, then under Muslim occupation until the end of WW1 and British occupation until 1948 when they finally threw off their oppressors and restored their sovereignty.

self-determination

    Falestinians never had self-determination because they were and are undifferentiated Arabs, nothing special. They never had a separate culture, currency, language and nation.  They do not crave a state of their own, they crave a regional and global caliphate: pan Arabism. .

occupiers

    Palestine is occupied by falestinians, not the other way around.  It ain't Arab land, Arabs stole it from Israel, the Ottoman Empire lost it in WW1.   Israel recovered some of  the land that was stolen from her in 1948.  In 1967, they recovered more when the Arabs attacked them again.

On a daily basis, the houses are being destroyed over the heads of innocent women and children. People are deprived of water, food and medicine in their own homeland.

houses  destroyed

    Houses constructed illegally, houses used to conceal smuggling tunnels and houses sheltering terrorists who kill Jews are destroyed.  If Falestinians were not  building without permits and attacking Jews, they would be secure in their homes.

deprivation

    The Falestinians were far better off and more prosperous when Israel was running things. Their fortunes crumbled  after their own  corrupt leaders wasted their resources on graft and weapons.  They could have peace & prosperity, they chose war and poverty. Their choice, their suffering.

The Zionists have imposed five all-out wars on the neighboring countries and on the Palestinian people.

five wars

    That assertion is a total inversion of history.  Muslims were the aggressors in every case.  The fact that Israel preempted their attack in 1967  changes nothing.  Egypt had declared their genocidal intent and massed forces.

The Zionists committed the most horrible crimes against the defenseless people in the wars against Lebanon and Gaza.

horrible crimes

    Israel defended herself against aggression.  She had every right to flatten Lebanon & Gaza but stupidly  exercised restraint.  If  they did not attack, Israel; would not retaliate.  In his address to the General Assembly, P.M. Netanyahu  reiterated the details of extraordinary measures taken to minimize civilian casualties in Gaza.

The Zionist regime attacked a humanitarian flotilla in a blatant defiance of all international norms and kills the civilians.

humanitarian flotilla

    When Muslims videotape their "wills"  and declare "victory or martyrdom", they ain't civilians and their mission ain't humanitarian and everyone with any intelligence at all blessed well knows what they are and what fate they richly deserve.

This regime which enjoys the absolute support of some western countries regularly  threatens the countries in the region and continues publicly announced assassination  of Palestinian figures and others, while Palestinian defenders and those opposing this regime are pressured, labeled as terrorists and anti Semites. All values, even the  freedom of expression, in Europe and in the United States are being sacrificed at the altar of Zionism.

absolute support

    The Falestinians who launch rockets & mortars and attack Jews with guns, knives, axes, tractors and anything ready to hand  have the  unconditional support of Russia, the OIC, the United Nations, and  the European Union.  What are they kvetching about??  The U.S.A., while pretending to support Israel, arrogantly demand that she commit suicide.   As always, Muslims invert objective factual reality as well as morality.

Solutions are doomed to fail because the right of the Palestinian people is not taken into account.

Falestinian right

    They are undifferentiated Arabs, not a people, not a nation, and have no more rights than anyone else.  They have no legitimate claim to Israel's land.   The only solution is to usher them into Hell, from where they can no longer attack Jews.

Would we have witnessed such horrendous crimes if instead of recognizing the occupation, the sovereign right of the Palestinian people had been recognized?

horrendous crimes

    Thousands of missiles, hundreds of mortar shells, dozens of homicide bombers, snipers, knife assaults; 5 wars of genocidal intent: these are the horrendous crimes committed by Islam against Israel.  The sovereign right of Israel has not been  fully recognized but ought to be.,  Falestine has no such right.

Our unambiguous proposition is the return of the Palestinian refugees to their home  land and the reference to the vote of the people of Palestine to exercise their  sovereignty and decide on the type of governance.

return

    They left at the urging of the Arab powers so that they could crush the Jews without collateral damage.  Their act of leaving was part of a campaign of genocide.  They therefore have no right to return, they abandoned the land and their homes for the purpose of furthering a campaign of genocide.  They forfeited all rights and claims.  To Hell with them and their descendants!!!

Nuclear energy is clean and cheap and a heavenly gift which is amongst the most   suitable alternatives to cut the pollutions emanating from fossil fuels.

Nuclear energy

    That is what leveled Hiroshima & Nagasaki. It is common knowledge that is the nuclear energy Iran seeks.  Oil  and gas are their main source of revenue. Domestically, using gas is far less expensive than their nuclearization campaign.  Their  program can not be justified on the basis of economics.  If we had any common sense, we would give it to them.

Very recently the world witnessed the ugly and inhumane act of burning the Holy Quran.  The Holy Quran is the Divine Book and the eternal miracle of the Prophet of lslam.  It calls for worshipping the One God, justice, compassion toward people,
development and progress, reflection and thinking, defending the oppressed and resisting against the oppressors; and it names with respect the previous Messengers of God, like Noah, Abraham, Isaaq, Joseph, Moses and Jesus Christ (Peace be Upon
them all) and endorses them..

Qur'an burning

    Does anyone raise Hell when they burn our flag and the Bible?  How do we react  when they march en mass chanting "death to America"?  Do we riot?  Do we burn autos and buildings?  Do we burn mosques?

divine book

    What the Hell is divine about a book  containing verses which gave divine sanction to wife beating, rape, pillage, plunder & genocide?  Even Moe's favorite wife was onto the fact that he issued situational scripture. ¹⁷  Go to your favorite hadith search engine and search for was revealed.  You will find plenty of evidence of situational scripture.

compassion

    Lashing, stoning, amputation; pretty damn compassionate!!! And for disbelievers¹⁵, there is crucifixion, too. ¹⁸

oppressors

    All rulers who ain't Muslims, who govern by man made law, are classified as oppressors by Islam.

Jesus Christ

    According to the Qur'an, he was not God's none, not divine, not crucified, never died  nor was resurrected.  According to the hadith, he will return as a genocidal warlord to kill the Jews and rule the world by the Qur'an. ¹⁹
.

For years the inefficiency of the capitalism and the existing world management and structures has been exposed and the majority of States and nations have been on a quest for fundamental changes and for the prevalence of justice in global relations.  The cause of the United Nation’s ineptitude is in its unjust structure. Major power  is monopolized in the Security Council due to the veto privilege, and the main pillar of the Organization, namely the General Assembly, is marginalized.   In the past several decades, at least one of the permanent members of the Security Council has always been a party to the disputes.  The veto advantage grants impunity to aggression and occupation; How could, therefore, one expect competence while both the judge and the prosecutor are a party to the dispute?
Had Iran enjoyed veto privilege, would the Security Council and the IAEA  Director General have taken the same position in the nuclear issue?

hypocrisy

    If I need to point it out to you, you are too stupid to recognize it, no matter how I might emphasize it.  The comparative records of  feudalism, capitalism, socialism and communism are clear on the record of history.  No system is perfect, but capitalism is far superior.

    The U.N. is  built on consensus and compromise.  It could not have been formed otherwise.  Nobody was willing to have  a new institution to be created to
be used against them.   For America to participate without having veto power would be suicidal.  I hope that we are not that stupid.

The United Nations is the key center for coordinating the common global management. Its structure needs to be reformed in a manner that all independent States and nations be able to participate in the global governance actively and  constructively.

The veto privilege should be revoked and the General Assembly should be the highest body and the Secretary-General should be the most independent official and all his positions and activities should be taken with the approval of the General
Assembly and should be directed towards promoting justice and eliminating discrimination.

The Secretary-General should not come under pressure from powers and/or the country hosting the Organization for his stating the truth and administration ofjustice.  It is suggested that the General Assembly should, within one year and in the
framework of an extraordinary session, finalize the reformation of the Organization’s structure

The Islamic Republic of Iran has clear suggestions in this regard and stands ready to participate actively and constructively in the process.

UN Reform

    Like Ghadaffy²⁰, Ahmedinejad is demanding that we turn the U.N. over to the predator nations.  We should let the OIC dominate the world and use the U.N. as a tool of conquest.  In Hell we should!  While right does not make right, neither do numbers.  They are not smarter, better informed, more rational, more competent or better qualified to run the world  just because they outnumber us.  Starting with a large population base and breeding like rats is not a spring of virtue.

    The world is not a unitary body to be run, dominated or managed.  The several nations remain sovereign.  International institutions should be tools for cooperation, not for seizing power and plundering minorities.

I announce clearly that the occupation of other countries under the pretext of freedom and democracy is an unforgivable crime.

The world needs the logic of compassion and justice and inclusive participation instead oflogic offorce, domination, unilateralism, war and intimidation.

The world needs to be governed by virtuous people like the Divine Prophets.

pretext

    If done  to promote freedom & democracy, occupation is "an unforgivable crime".  But of course,  when the objective is elimination of "oppression", its a  divine virtue.  To us, freedom & democracy are the opposite of oppression; to Muslims, they are oppression.  

The world needs

    "The logic of compassion and justice" translates to: Islam, the very opposite of what the world needs.

governed by

   "Virtuous people like the Divine Prophets " translates:to: Muslims, the very opposite of what the world needs.

---

1. " I do not intend to wage war against you till you receive my written reason for it. It is better for you, either to accept Islam or agree to pay Jiziya and consent to remain obedient to Allah, His prophet and his messengers. My messengers deserve honour. Treat them with respect. Whatever pleases my messengers, will also please me."...  http://alquraan.net/letters/letters_3.html#LETTER%20TO%20THE%20CHIEFS%20OF%20AQABA
2. He will fight the people for the cause of Islam. He will break the cross, kill swine, and abolish jizyah. Allah will perish all religions except Islam.  Sunan Abu Dawud 37.4310
3. Sahih Bukhari 4.52.191
4. http://www.islamicbulletin.com/free_downloads/resources/reliance_complete.pdf#page=621
5. 9:23. O you who believe! Take not for Auliyâ' (supporters and helpers) your fathers and your brothers if they prefer disbelief to Belief. And whoever of you does so, then he is one of the Zâlimûn (wrong-doers, etc.). 
6. http://www.islamicbulletin.com/free_downloads/resources/reliance_complete.pdf#page=620
7. Ahmad Khatami, member of  the Assembly of Experts, quoted by Reuters. 
8. http://www.islamicbulletin.com/free_downloads/resources/reliance_complete2.pdf#page=596
9. http://www.islamicbulletin.com/free_downloads/resources/reliance_complete2.pdf#page=620
10. http://snooper.wordpress.com/2008/10/10/whats-wrong-with-islammuslims/
11. 8:12
12. 33:26
13. Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220
14. 8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.
15. "`Wage war' mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways." The Punishment of those Who Cause Mischief in the Land
16. We have all been had!
• Palestinian people do not exist
• Refugee scam
• Palestine Facts makes the relevant regional history available.
17. Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 311:
    
    Narrated Aisha:
    
    I used to look down upon those ladies who had given themselves to Allah's Apostle and I used to say, "Can a lady give herself (to a man)?" But when Allah revealed: "You (O Muhammad) can postpone (the turn of) whom you will of them (your wives), and you may receive any of them whom you will; and there is no blame on you if you invite one whose turn you have set aside (temporarily).' (33.51) I said (to the Prophet), "I feel that your Lord hastens in fulfilling your wishes and desires." 
18. 5:33. The recompense of those who wage war against Allâh and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter. 
19. The Defamation of Jesus Christ
20. Moammar Al-Gadhafi at the UN The lunatic thinks he should run the asylum. 10/01/09

Sphere: Related Content

Combating Defamation of Religions: the Substance

The final text of the Combating Defamation of Religions resolution (passed 12/18/'09) spans pages 67-72 of a 151 page pdf file: A/64/439/Add.2, part II. If you want to read it aloud, you'd better take breath control lessons, because the resolution is basically one long run on sentence. It begins by recalling and reaffirming previous resolutions and documents. The trip down the memory lane sewer is followed by a series of statements of alarm and concern.

Expressing serious concern at the increase in racist violence...

Are they seriously concerned about the recent burning and looting of Christian churches, homes and businesses in Egypt & Pakistan? Of course not, that is not what concerns them.

as a result, inter alia, of the resurgence of activities of political parties and associations established on the basis of racist, xenophobic and ideological superiority platforms and charters, and the persistent use of those platforms and charters to promote or incite racist ideologies,

No, their concern is about the Dutch Freedom Party and similar parties in Europe which express concern about Islamic encroachment & demographic conquest. But they are deeply concerned about:

the negative projection of certain religions in the media

Next they progress to stressing:

the defamation of religions is a serious affront to human dignity leading to the illicit restriction of the freedom of religion of their adherents and incitement to religious hatred and violence,

Do they refer to these examples?

• 1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians).
• 8:55. Verily, The worst of moving (living) creatures before Allâh are those who disbelieve , - so they shall not believe.
• 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
• 9:30. And the Jews say: 'Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians say: Messiah is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths. They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh's Curse be on them, how they are deluded away from the truth!
• 9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious - see V.2:2).
  

Islamic scripture calumniates Jews, Christians and disbelievers in general, then it declares war and incites violence against them. Where is the U.N.'s concern about that prime exemplar of evil? See what else they are stressing.

the need to effectively combat defamation of all religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general,

Reaffirming that discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief constitutes a violation of human rights and a disavowal of the principles of the Charter,

What is defamation of religions; what constitutes incitement to hatred? Who decides? I direct your attention to Ban Ki-moon's egregious condemnation of the short documentary by Geert Wilders.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:

“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

The man chiefly responsible for enforcing the Universal Declaration of Human Rights asserts that there is no right to tell the truth about Islam. [Emphasis added for clarity.] Fitna is not hate speech nor is it incitement; it accurately depicts Islamic hate speech and incitement.

Demonstrating the intimate connection (cause & effect) between Islam's scripture and violence evidently constitutes hate speech and violence. Take a good long look at the incidents the OIC complains about in their Islamophobia report. Here is what it all boils down to.

Expresses deep concern in this respect that Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism;

Human rights violations? Such as the right to life? How about the right to be secure in their person and property? How are our rights affected by the declaration of war previously cited (9:29)? How are our rights affected by Muhammad's complete denial of them, as well as the sanctity of our blood & property?

Is Islam wrongly associated with terrorism? Who created that association? What did Allah say about terrorism?

• 3:151. We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers).
• 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, "Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes."
• 8:57. So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson.
• 8:60. Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly.
• 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
• 59:2. He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî An-Nadîr) from their homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from Allâh! But Allâh's (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with eyes (to see).
• 59:13. Verily, you (believers in the Oneness of Allâh - Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh. That is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power of Allâh).
  

Allah said that he would cast terror, Muslims must cast terror, and they did cast terror. What did Muhammad say?

• Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331 [...] Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month's journey. [...]
• Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220 [...] I have been made victorious with terror [...]

Allah said he would cast terror, Moe said he was made victorious by it. There is nothing wrong with the association of Islam with terrorism! Lets look at the specific application of the wrongly associated meme.

Reiterates the commitment of all States to the implementation, in an integrated manner, of the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, which was adopted without a vote by the General Assembly on 8 September 200614 and reaffirmed by the Assembly in its resolution 62/272 of 5 September 2008, and which clearly confirms, inter alia, that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group, stressing the need to reinforce the international community’s commitment to promote a culture of peace, justice and human development, ethnic, national and religious tolerance, and respect for all religions, religious values, beliefs or cultures and prevent the defamation of
religions;

Any association of Islam with terrorism is defamatory by default. So I have defamed Islam by quoting from its own canon of scripture and tradition. Yeah, right. What is the bottom line?

Reaffirms the obligation of all States to enact the necessary legislation to prohibit the advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, and encourages States, in their follow-up to the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance,7 to include aspects relating to national or ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities in their national plans of action and, in this context, to take forms of multiple discrimination against minorities fully into account;

Do you remember what Ban said about Fitna ("incitement to violence")? They postulate a national obligation to criminalize documentaries such as Fitna and this blog post.

The Combating Defamation of Religious resolutions are propaganda, not law. But they serve to add a false patina of legitimacy to existing blasphemy laws in Pakistan and other places where they are used to persecute adherents of minority religions. They also create an atmosphere of support for the proposed protocol to ICERD which is slowly progressing in the Ad Hoc Committee for the Elaboration of Complementary Standards. That protocol will become binding international law.

For an extensive bibliography refer to: Defamation of Religions: Background Info. To find U.N. documents referenced in the resolution's foot notes use this search engine.

Sphere: Related Content

Rhetoric/Incidents: Islam's Hypocrisy

In the context of seeking hate crime prosecution in a Californian assault case, CAIR brought up a statement by CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper.

“Our nation’s religious, political and community leaders need to address the growing anti-Muslim rhetoric on the Internet and on talk radio that can lead to such incidents,”

Hooper was demanding enforcement of Islamic blasphemy laws, implying that assaults on Muslims are directly linked to criticism of Islam by bloggers and talk radio hosts. He was echoing the rhetoric of U.N. General Assembly and UNHRC resolutions condemning "defamation of Islam".

• Deplores the use of the print, audio-visual and electronic media, including the Internet, and any other means to incite acts of violence, xenophobia or
  related intolerance and discrimination against Islam or any other religion, as well as targeting of religious symbols
• Also urges States to provide, within their respective legal and constitutional systems, adequate protection against acts of hatred, discrimination,
  intimidation and coercion resulting from defamation of religions, to take all possible measures to promote tolerance and respect for all religions and their value systems and to complement legal systems with intellectual and moral strategies to combat religious hatred and intolerance;

More recently, the President of the Ad Hoc Committee On Complementary Standards issued a "Non-Paper Paper" outlining strategy for a protocol to ICERD. Pay close attention to this critical excerpt.

5- Incitement to racial, national and religious hatred

1. There is a need for further clarifying and reinforcing at the international level existing obligations on the eradication of all incitement to hatred and ' discrimination in any form and to prohibit by law, propaganda for war and advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence.
2. In this context, complementary standards to be developed should observe the following parameters:
• Article 4 of ICERD shall be extended to the crime of incitement to racial hatred covering offenses motivated by religious hatred against immigrant communities.
• The protection provided shall extend to all individuals and groups within the jurisdiction of the State Party.
• The prohibitions shall equally cover acts committed by any individual, group or organization, including political and media organizations as well as by national or local public authorities.
• The provisions shall apply to any act which, in purpose or effect, incites discrimination, hostility or violence.

In recent months, there have been news reports of rioting and anti-Christian pogroms in India, Indonesia, Pakistan, Nigeria & Kenya. When do those events take place? When did the rioting over the Danish Cartoons take place? Why do riots happen immediately after Juma prayer services? What is preached in those sermons?

Muslims want Fiitna and similar revelations criminalize because the connection between the Qur'an & Islamic sermons and riots is revealed therein. They want this and similar blog posts criminalize because I expose their hypocrisy. Predators who slither in dark crevices and under rocks do not like being exposed in the light of truth.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:

“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.” [Emphasis added.]

The Secretary General labeled Fitna "hate speech" & "incitement to violence" . Click the link and watch the documentary. Where is the hate speech? Where is the incitement? They are only in the Qur'an, hadith & Kutbah displayed; they do not flow from the lips of Geert Wilders.

There is plenty of hate speech and incitement to violence in the Qur'an, enough to make Islam a constant static violation of ICERD & ICCPR. This fact is fully documented in the International Qur'an Petition. It is Islam that must be outlawed, not 'Islamophobia'.

Sphere: Related Content