Showing posts with label Iran. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Iran. Show all posts

Saturday, January 17, 2009

Those who forget history...

*cross-posted from Assoluta Tranquillita*

...are doomed to repeat it.

I have often reminded readers about Iran 1979, and pointed out that when the Ayatollah Khemeini returned to Iran from exile in Paris, the west really was not paying attention. That was so evident when "students" stormed the US embassy in Tehran and took American hostages. Those "students" were the forerunners - I believe - of our current problems with Islam.

Yes, it was thirty years ago today that the Shah of Iran, who some see as a puppet of the west, left Iran, and Iran began its overt journey to what we deal with globally today:

  • 1979

    January The ailing Shah leaves Iran. He dies in Cairo in 1980.

    February Ayatollah Khomeini returns as leader of the revolution. The armed forces announce their neutrality and the monarchy collapses. The Ayatollah takes power with Mehdi Bazargan as his prime minister.

    Ayatollah Khomeini receives an ecstatic welcome
    Ayatollah Khomeini returned to an ecstatic welcome
    November Radical students occupy the American Embassy and hold 52 American diplomats hostage for 444 days.

    December The new Islamic constitution is ratified by a referendum.

  • 1980 The Iraqi forces attack Iran on 20 September beginning a war that lasts until 18 July 1988.







  • What I most remember about those days was the role of the Canadian Ambassador, Ken Taylor. Away from the media spotlight, he worked to help the Americans, and was later recognised for that. I also remember how the Iranians held the Americans until the very end of Jimmy Carter's time in office. There has been much written about those days, and as always, what I find most interesting are the first person accounts. Never mind the political rhetoric, and the congratulatory chest thumping, it is always those most intimately affected by the events of history, who share the most compelling stories. Within their reminiscences are the markers of history, which we would all do well to pay attention to. One man from Iran 1979 is Robert C. Ode. Quite apart from the typically bland retelling of events that I found on the Jimmy Carter Library and Musem site (yes, there really is such a thing, and you can find that here,) I found a synopsis about Mr Ode, and also links to some of his writings:

    Robert C. Ode was one of the fifty-two American citizens taken hostage by Iranian students in November 1979 at the American embassy in Tehran. They were held for a total of 444 days and finally released, after lengthy negotiations, on January 20, 1981.

    Ode (pronounced Odee) was the oldest of the hostages and was in fact retired from diplomatic service. He had taken a special assignment to go to Tehran and expected to be there only a few months when taken with the other embassy staff.

    He was allowed to keep a diary after a few months as captive, when conditions under which the hostages lived were loosened, although the conditions were never good. The hostages were separated into small groups that were not allowed to communicate. They were cut off from outside news and contact with the American government, while letters to and from their families were delivered late or not at all. They were blindfolded when taken outside their rooms to take showers or exercise. Moreover, the students were very amateurish jailers, so that essential supplies frequently ran out, meals were often late and improvised and frequently inadequate, and onerous security restrictions far in excess of what was needed were arbitrarily applied. More serious was the problem that medical attention was extremely inadequate, while many of the hostages were senior embassy staff with serious health worries. Above all, there was the psychological pressure of never knowing when they would be released or what the American government was doing to help them.

    Ode's journal consists of 115 pages. What is presented here are selected pages illustrating either significant changes or problems in the conditions of his captivity, along with some typical days where the main problems were boredom or food. The full diary is available to the public. For information, contact the Jimmy Carter Library in Atlanta at (404) 865-7100 or e-mail carter.library@nara.gov

    Robert C. Ode

    Although many of their letters were not delivered to each other, a mainstay of Ode's captivity was the correspondence of his family and friends, especially his wife, Rita Muth Ode, who was under great strain herself but cheered Ode with accounts of the new home she was preparing for his retirement, occasionally receiving advice about the new house from her captive husband.

    After months of negotiations, the Iranian government released the hostages in January 1981. The negotiations had been conducted by the Carter administration, while the release was made the first day of the Reagan administration. President Reagan asked Carter to fly to Germany to welcome the released hostages, while Reagan announced their return to Congress and the world.

    Ode died on September 8, 1995 in Sun City West, Arizona, where he had lived in retirement with Rita in the home that she had described to him in her letters while he was captive in Iran....

    Go here to find links to Mr. Ode's diary entries.

    Also on this day? As the BBC puts it:

    1991: 'Mother of all Battles' begins
    The Gulf War Allies have sent hundreds of planes on bombing raids into Iraq, at the start of Operation Desert Storm.

    The American, British, French, Saudi and Kuwaiti aircraft took off at 2330 GMT last night.

    Their bombs were aimed at military and strategic targets, including an oil refinery and Baghdad airport.

    At least 400 raids took place. Latest reports say all the Allied aircraft have returned home safely, although France says four of its planes were hit.

    US Defence Secretary, Dick Cheney, said the operation appeared to have gone "very well".

    Two hours after the raids began, President George Bush made a televised address.

    He said the military objectives were clear - force Iraqi troops out of Kuwait and restore the legitimate government.

    In Baghdad, Saddam Hussein remained defiant. He said the "Mother of all Battles had begun". He urged the Iraqi people to "stand up to evil".

    First news of the bombing came from reporters in Baghdad working for the American TV network, CNN. They reported hearing air raid sirens shortly before the bombs hit.

    President Bush said: "Our operations are designed to best protect the lives of all the coalition forces by targeting Saddam's vast military arsenal.

    "Initial reports from General Schwarzkopf are that our operations are proceeding according to plan."

    The British Prime Minister, John Major, came out of Number Ten shortly before 0800 GMT to make a statement to reporters.

    "No-one wanted this conflict. No-one can be pleased about the fact this conflict has been necessary," he said.

    "I hope now it is clear to Iraq that the scale of the Allied operation is such that they cannot win....

    Lots of interesting links to the events on the BBC here. There are a few first person accounts there, too. Some of the pictures from Desert Storm here:

    Kuwaiti soldier
    A Kuwaiti soldier with a machine gun stands silhouetted on the skyline

    British soldiers
    British Army soldiers are given injections against the effects of a possible chemical atteck

    Laser-guided bombs
    British and US forces prepare to launch laser-guided bombs on Iraq

    Spent missile
    A US soldier examines the wreckage of a missile, believed to be a Scud, which landed in Saudi Arabia

    Burning Oil Wells
    A cow stands in front of burning oil wells, set alight by retreating Iraqi forces in the al-Ahmadi oil fields near Kuwait City

    French soldiers
    French soldiers patrol under a mural of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein in Southern Iraq

    Iraqi Prisoners of War
    An Egyptian soldier guards Iraqi prisoners in the Kuwaiti desert

    A Kuwaiti celebrates
    A Kuwaiti raises his arms in celebration as Allied forces arrive in Kuwait City

    Saddam Hussein
    Saddam Hussein speaks on television for the first time after Iraq's defeat

    Liberation of Kuwait
    Kuwait City celebrates after the liberation

    New York celebrations
    New Yorkers celebrate the end of the Gulf War

    What did we learn from history? I suggest one was that when we go out to do a job, we better finish it. The historians will, no doubt, be pontificating for years about the success of the mission dubbed The "Mother of all Battles", and I don't need to add my two cents' worth. What was obvious to even this non military observer was that the job was unfinished. And so it was:

    On 27 February, President George Bush declared victory. Kuwait was liberated but Saddam Hussein remained in power in Baghdad.

    On 20 March 2003, President George Bush junior led a "coalition of the willing" on an invasion of Iraq with the aim of toppling the Bagdad regime....(here)

    As history shows, the "coalition of the willing" DID give Baghdad - and Iraq - back to the Iraqi people. The history which still remains to be written is whether or not we managed to eradicate the scourge of Islam and their Religion of Death globally. Our battle against the madmen of Islam continues to this day. As a new President gets set to lead America, it will be interesting to see if the 44th President has learned anything from history. The evidence of all that Islam means to do on a worldwide scale has been writ large for many decades. Only time will tell if this next President will ignore all the signs. We ignore the lessons of history at our peril.

    Sphere: Related Content

    Friday, October 31, 2008

    Has Iran Gone Nuclear?

    Cross posted from Monkey in the Middle

    Reports coming out from the Middle East suggest that last weekends 5.0 earthquake in Southern Iran was in reality a nuclear weapons test. If these reports are true, then the worst fears of the West and Israel have come to reality. Could a major attack on Israel or a Western city be only weeks away?
    (IsraelNN.com) A weekend 5.0 Richter earthquake in Iran was actually a nuclear bomb test, says an Iranian nuclear scientist claiming to be working on the project.

    The report is an Israel Insider exclusive.

    This past Saturday night, southern Iran experienced what was reported as a significant earthquake - a seismic event measuring 5.0 on the Richter scale. Its epicenter was just north of the strategic Straits of Hormuz, which separates Iran from Abu Dhabi and Oman and which is the gateway to the Persian Gulf.

    The report quotes an Iranian nuclear scientist who claims to be working in uranium enrichment for the project, and who said that the "quake" was acutally an undergound nuclear bomb test.

    Israel Insider adds that the test/quake was actually the second in a series. Nine days ago, a 4.8 Richter scale event occurred, with its epicenter only five kilometers away from the weekend tremor.

    The Israel Insider source reports that two nuclear rockets are currently ready - and are intended for use against Israel in the coming months.

    If the report is correct, it would belie previous speculation that Iran would not begin nuclear testing until it had more nuclear-bomb production capability.

    The geographical location of the test has several advantages. It is exposed to significant seismic activity, which could serve to mask nuclear tests; it is believed to be close to Iran's nuclear development facility; delivery and transport of material and personnel can be effected easily through the Hormuz Strait; and Iranian enemies would hesitate to bomb the area because that would threaten the flow of a substantial percentage of the world's oil.

    Reuters reports Thursday morning that Iran has begun building a line of naval bases along its southern coast and up to the Straits of Hormuz.

    Full Story
    If true, this will have changed the whole dynamic of the region. Iran could dictate to the Persian Gulf nations their terms of surrender to them.

    An attack by Iran of a nuclear nature on any nation will bring upon disaster not only for that nation, but for Iran. It would mean a like attack in response. Millions would die.

    Sphere: Related Content

    Tuesday, March 11, 2008

    Censorship & Federal Ban on Anonymity

    http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3517960,00.html
    YNET News reports on the whining about Geert Wilders' upcoming film about the demon's book. Their report contains two crucial quotations.

    Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Mehdi Safari cited the 1948 Human Rights declaration's 29th article that individual rights may be limited in the interest of respecting other people's freedoms and "meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society."

    My right of free expression, guaranteed by the first amendment to the United States Constitution, is not in conflict with any other right of any person. There is no right to be sheltered from the truth. Rights & obligations must be reciprocal, they are not one sided.

    Muslims refer to us as "sons of apes and pigs", the expression derives from the demon's book. That same book invokes the demon's curse upon us. Guess what they pray for...

    "Our Lord! Pour forth on us patience and make us victorious over the disbelieving people." (2/250)

    Article 29.

      (1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.

      (2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.

      (3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.


    Islam arrogates to itself a false right to inflict offense while being shielded from it; they can curse us; we must be prohibited from responding.


    "Freedom of speech is not unlimited," Tehran's ambassador to the Netherlands, Bozorgmehr Ziaran told a small group of reporters at the Iranian Embassy. The film, he added, "would just breed violence." Wilders, Ziaran said, "is not a peacemaker, Mr. Wilders is a warmonger."

    Does anyone believe that Wilders will, in his film, incite violence? Did the Danish cartoons incite Danes to assault Muslims? Who was it that shot and knifed Priests and Nuns, who burned churches and embassies? Why did the violence follow Juma prayers? Was there no connection between the kutbah and the violence? Were Kuffar marching in the thousands, chanting curses and swearing vengance? Who was?

    Reliance of the Traveler lists acts tantamount to apostasy, which carries a death penalty. [Book O8.7]
    -4-to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace);
    -5- to deny the existence of Allah, His beginingless eternality, His endless eternality, or to deny any of His attributes which the consensus of Muslims ascribes to Him (dis: v1);
    -6- to be sarcastic about Allah's name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat;
    -7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does belong to it
    ...
    -16- to revile the religion of Islam;
    -17- to believe that things in themselves or by their own nature have any causal influence independent of the will of Allah;
    -18- to deny the existence of angels or jinn (def: w22), or the heavens;
    -19- to be sarcastic about any ruling of the Sacred Law;
    -20- or to deny that Allah intended the Prophet's message (Allah bless him and give him peace) to be the religion followed by the entire world (dis: w4.3-4) (al-Hadiyya al-`Ala'iyya (y4), 423-24). )

    You know already, that they have no regard for our lives or property, having declared open season on us. Are you aware of the fact, that on December 24, 2007, the United Nations General Assembly resolved to ban criticism of Islam?

    Now a new domestic threat to our liberty & privacy has appeared. WTVQ in Kentucky reports that their M.C. is seeking to outlaw anonymous posting on the web. Those of us who risk fatwa by exposing the evil doctrines of Moe's murder cult would be forced to reveal our full names and physical addresses so that the assassins could find us easily.

    From WTVQ:

    Kentucky Representative Tim Couch filed a bill this week to make anonymous posting online illegal.

    Couch's bill would require anyone contributing to a web site to file their real name, physical address and email address with the site. Your full name would be displayed with your comments.

    Fines for anonymous posting would be $500 for the first offense; $1000 for subsequent offenses. The excuse for the bill: to reduce on line bullying.

    Couch's bill would be a foot in the door, the first step toward censorship. Can attempts to regulate content be far behind?

    Ben 03/12/08

    Sphere: Related Content

    Thursday, September 27, 2007

    Bush : Iran: Obligation to Act

    Opinion Journal has an excellent article chronicling President Bush's warnings to Iran and his failure to take effective action. Here is their concluding paragraph.[Emphasis added.]

    The Bush Presidency is running out of time to act if it wants to stop Iran from gaining a bomb. With GIs fighting and dying in Iraq, Mr. Bush also owes it to them not to allow enemy sanctuaries or weapons pipelines from Iran. If the President believes half of what he and his Administration have said about Iran's behavior, he has an obligation to do whatever it takes to stop it.

    Please read the entire article and email the last paragraph and its url to comments@whitehouse.gov as I have done. Its the least you can do in support of our troops.

    Sphere: Related Content

    Sunday, September 2, 2007

    Iran Claims Its Uranium Goal Has Been Reached


    Cross posted from Wake up America

    If this is true, then they are closer to a nuclear bomb than the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)thought they were as they said last week.

    According to the LA Times, Iran is claiming they have reached the 3,000 running centrifuges for uranium enrichment, which would put them one year away from having enough nuclear material for a nuclear bomb.
    TEHRAN -- Iran claimed today that it had reached its goal of running 3,000 centrifuges for uranium enrichment, a much higher number than recently estimated by the United Nations' atomic agency. If true, the accomplishment might allow Iran to produce enough nuclear material for a bomb within a year, military experts have calculated.

    President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was quoted by state television as saying that despite economic sanctions by the United Nations, his country had "taken another step in the nuclear progress and launched more than 3,000 centrifuge machines."

    It could not be independently verified whether Iran, which the West has often accused of exaggerating its nuclear capabilities for domestic propaganda, had reached it long-sought-after objective. Centrifuges spin at high rates of speed to enrich uranium and are critical to generating electricity or building a nuclear bomb.

    A report released last week by the International Atomic Energy Agency estimated that Tehran had nowhere near 3,000 centrifuges operating. It found that the country's plant at Natanz was running 1,968 centrifuges, a 50% increase over the number it had on line in April. However, the report says Iran has only enriched uranium to 3.7%, well below the 90% needed for weapons-grade material.
    The last two sets of UN sanctions have been little more than a slap on the wrist for Iran, due to Russia and China watering those sanctions down to a point where they have obviously been completely ineffective.

    I asked the other day if there was going to be an attack on Iran and many pundits and bloggers from both sides of the aisle are already claiming it is inevitable, is it?
    So much talk from both sides of the aisle here in America as well as being commented on by France, via Sarkozy the new President of France, which yesterday issued a warning to Iran to comply with their international obligations or face an attack.

    After Sarkozy's public statement which shocked many, we saw this morning that Iran, ratcheting up the stakes makes a statement claiming they are ready to step into Iraq.

    Times Online reports on President Bush's comments concerning Iran's pursuit to an atomic bomb could lead to a nuclear holocaust in the Middle East and vowing to confront Tehran before it is too late.

    What exactly did Bush and Sarkozy talk about when Sarkozy visited the states and had meetings, private and open with President Bush?

    Did they discuss putting more pressure on Iran via these public statements?

    Is this also a way to put pressure on the UN to stop watering down the resolutions and start toughening up the sanctions on Iran to force them to comply?

    Is an attack on Iran inevitable or can diplomatic solutions stop this crash course with Iran regarding their nuclear ambitions?
    Lets see what they are saying and why before we attempt to answer this.

    According to the blog Informed Comment Global Affairs:
    The legal argument to bypass the U.S. Congress has already been floated. As I noted in my DailyKos post:
    The U.S. cannot mount a ground invasion or occupation of Iran, but it might be capable of an air attack and sea embargo. The administration has prepared a legal justification by floating its plan to designate the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps a terrorist organization. Since the IRGC is under the command of the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, the administration, with its usual legal acuity, could claim legal authority for an attack on Iran under Senate Joint Resolution 23 of September 18, 2001,which authorized the use of military force against "those who plan, authorize, commit, or aid terrorist attacks against the United States and its interests -- including those who harbor terrorists."
    Also according to a diarist over ay DailyKos, Maccabee, it is a done deal, according to a source they claim to have...this could be true or a complete fabrication, know one really knows.
    "I don’t think it’s limited at all. We are shipping in and assigning every damn Tomahawk we have in inventory. I think this is going to be massive and sudden, like thousands of targets. I believe that no American will know when it happens until after it happens. And whatever the consequences, whatever the consequences, they will have to be lived with. I am sure if my father knew I was telling someone in a news organization that we were about to launch a supposedly secret attack that it would be treason. But something inside me tells me to tell it anyway."
    By the way, just as a side note, I am with Macsmind here that IF, very big IF, Maccabee is telling the truth, then this "source" has just betrayed the country in an act of treason by speaking to possible pending operations where our troops lives are at stake.

    QandO points out information fromt he Maccabee post that shows it to probably be nothing more than a sack of....umm...lies.

    We know without a doubt that plans are made up in preparation for most eventualities, so it is no big surprise that we have a plan of action should we decide to attack Iran and Times Online has brought us some of those plans.
    THE Pentagon has drawn up plans for massive airstrikes against 1,200 targets in Iran, designed to annihilate the Iranians’ military capability in three days, according to a national security expert.

    Alexis Debat, director of terrorism and national security at the Nixon Center, said last week that US military planners were not preparing for “pinprick strikes” against Iran’s nuclear facilities. “They’re about taking out the entire Iranian military,” he said.

    Debat was speaking at a meeting organised by The National Interest, a conservative foreign policy journal. He told The Sunday Times that the US military had concluded: “Whether you go for pinprick strikes or all-out military action, the reaction from the Iranians will be the same.” It was, he added, a “very legitimate strategic calculus”.
    All of this is public news at this point and the lunatic from Iran (Ahmadinejad) already knows about it, so his statement about having completed the 3,000 running centrifuge mark is a simple "screw you" to the international community.

    Members from the left have their panties in a bunch as Michael van der Galiën so puts it:

    The liberal part of the blogosphere has its panties up in a bunch, because more and more people report that the US is preparing for war (against Iran).

    Maccabee writes at Daily Kos that (s)he had a conversation with a friend - a friend who “is an LSO on a carrier attack group that is planning and staging a strike group deployment into the Gulf of Hormuz.” According to Maccabee (I have no idea how serious we should take this person) this friend told him (her) that the US is most definitely going to “hit Iran, bigtime” soon. Barnett R. Rubin - who I do trust - adds that those who can know basically told him the same thing. According to Barnett, the White House planned a major PR offensive right after Labor Day, after which the US will act.

    Now, I understand that this is fascinating for political analysts (to think about), but once again it seems to me that all these people are doing right now is ringing the alarm bells, saying ’stop the war’ without offering a valid alternative. Once again it seems that they are more busy opposing Bush than thinking about possible solutions for the problem with Iran.

    He is right, instead of looking at the problem and trying to come up with solutions, members of the far left are too busy pissing and moaning about Bush instead of the more serious discussion of how to stop Iran without bombing the hell out of them.

    Bush doesn't need any permission for Congress to act, he has 90 days AFTER taking action to get approval from them and by then, according to the plans shown above, it would be a moot point.

    So, my questions from above still stand:
    What exactly did Bush and Sarkozy talk about when Sarkozy visited the states and had meetings, private and open with President Bush?

    Did they discuss putting more pressure on Iran via these public statements?

    Is this also a way to put pressure on the UN to stop watering down the resolutions and start toughening up the sanctions on Iran to force them to comply?

    Is an attack on Iran inevitable or can diplomatic solutions stop this crash course with Iran regarding their nuclear ambitions?
    Being that we cannot disprove Ahmadinejad claims, we must go with the assumption that he is telling the truth, anything else would be suicidal.

    That gives us a year or less to either force him to cease and stop his nuclear activities, which China and Russia will not agree to anything strong enough to do so, or someone attacks them as Sarkozy said would happen.

    With the good news that we have come to an agreement with North Korea, we now have a bigger problem still facing us with Iran.

    We do have a few months yet before action is imperative, but is it wise to wait until the last minute, taking the chance that they may be closer than what even they are saying?

    On the other hand, what if they are full of hot air and really aren't close to 3,000 running centrifuges? Do we have a way, through the IAEA do disprove it?

    Iran is playing a very dangerous game here, figuratively speaking, they are poking a tiger with a stick to see how riled up they can make it, but is that smart to do when the tiger is fully capable of destroying you because there is no cage between you and said tiger?

    Sphere: Related Content

    Thursday, July 12, 2007

    Lieberman, Iran, Roll call and the Liberals are losing it

    Cross Posted from Wake up America

    Just caught this on the news while I was cooking, sooooooo, of course I had to run upstairs and do a quickie.

    Joe Lieberman along with McCain, Kyl, Graham, and Coleman, offered up an amendment to the Defense Authorization Act, confronting the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran over its proxy attacks on American soldiers in Iraq, and it passed with a vote of 97-0.

    Roll call can be found here.

    Statement of purpose: To require a report on support provided by the Government of Iran for attacks against coalition forces in Iraq.

    Liebermans statement from his site (linked above)
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Senators Lieberman, McCain, Kyl, Graham, and Coleman today introduced a bipartisan amendment to the Defense Authorization Act, confronting the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran over its proxy attacks on American soldiers in Iraq.

    The amendment details the publicly available evidence put forward over the past year by General David Petraeus, commanding general of Multi-National Force Iraq, and others about Iran’s violent and destabilizing activities in Iraq.

    The amendment states that “the murder of members of the United States Armed Forces by a foreign government or its agents is an intolerable act of hostility against the United States,” and demands the government of Iran “take immediate action” to end all forms of support it is providing to Iraqi militias and insurgents. The amendment also mandates a regular report on Iran’s anti-coalition activity in Iraq.

    “For many months, our military commanders and diplomats have warned us that the Iranian government has been training, equipping, arming, and funding proxies in Iraq who are murdering our troops,” said Senator Lieberman. “This amendment is a common sense, common ground statement of the Senate to Tehran: we know what you are doing, and you must stop.”

    “American officials attest that the government in Teheran seeks to bleed the United States and render unsuccessful our efforts to bring about a stable and self-governing in Iraq,” said Senator McCain. “This amendment will send a clear signal: Iran’s activities in Iraq are wrong, and they must end immediately.”

    “The Iranians are attempting to thwart our policies in the Middle East by actively supporting terrorists who are killing our troops in Iraq,” said Senator Kyl. “It is time we acknowledge this hostility against us, and this amendment tells the Iranians we will not tolerate any actions which threaten our troops or allies.”

    “The evidence is increasingly clear the Iranian government is working to destabilize the Iraqi government,” said Senator Graham. “It is long past time for Congress to speak out about this destructive behavior by Iran. We need one voice, and I expect it will be a unified bipartisan voice, speaking out and condemning these actions by the Iranian government.”

    “The United States will not tolerate Iran’s hostile attempts to sabotage our efforts in the Middle East region,” said Senator Coleman. “On my last trip to Iraq, our Minnesota troops in Southern Iraq showed me Iranian-made explosives that were used against them on convoy missions. This crucial amendment makes it clear to the Iranian government, and any other government in the region that seeks to harm our soldiers, that providing any form of support to Iraqi insurgents will not be tolerated and must cease immediately.”
    The text of the actual amendment should be here, when they actually get it up on the site. (That link will be changed if it ends up being put up at a different URL)

    Needless to say, the far left liberals do not even need to see the actual text, they are already throwing a hissy fit, here is an example of some of the comments coming from Firedoglake:

    P J Evans says:
    July 11th, 2007 at 2:31 pm

    Cr*p.

    We’re going to have to lose the Democrats in Congress, all of them, because they’re too f*cking stupid something to figure out what’s going on without someone reading the bills to them very slowly, and explaining all the words to them as they go along.

    We’ll need a new party name, too, because they’ve done to ‘Democratic’ what the GOoPers have done to ‘Republican’: turned it into a joke of an brand for a product that should be named ‘Acme’.

    How can they claim to be representing us, when they can’t even read the bill and figure out where it’s going, before they vote on it, and they don’t listen to us, when we tell them what we’re seeing and hearing out here in the real world?
    This next one is good too:

    selise says:
    June 26th, 2007 at 5:19 pm

    h.con.r.21 background here, here, and here.

    lots of good stuff in the links.

    bottom line - virtually the entire house of representatives (only 2 “no” votes - kucinich and paul) voted to ask the UN security council to charge ahmadinejad with “violating the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide and United Nations Charter” based on basically his calling for the genocide of israelis and because “Iran has aggressively pursued a clandestine effort to arm itself with nuclear weapons”.

    only problem is that the first is a lie (mistranslations) and there is not evidence for the second (see IAEA).

    when kucinich tried to enter into the congressional record the correct translation, he was prevented from doing so.

    so, now we have a document that bush can point to (after bombing iran) and say - “see, even the dems know that the iranian leader is a genocidal maniac pursuing nuclear weapons.”

    how could my D congress critters be so dumb?
    That is representative of what I am seeing on the liberal blogs right now and I am sure more will come.

    There has been ample evidence that Iran is directly responsible for killing U.S. Soldiers, which is why this bill passed with not a single vote against the amendment, but the liberals cannot see passed their hatred to understand this.

    More to come as reactions come in, which I assure you, they will.

    [Update] 7/12/07- Iran will have crossed the "nuclear threshold" by 2009.

    Sphere: Related Content

    Friday, March 16, 2007

    Friday Potpourri

    Several things that have caught my eye during the week:

    Gathering of Eagles in DC tomorrow: http://gatheringofeagles.org/. There's an anti-war rally in DC tomorrow and this is a grass roots effort to protect the memorials while supporting the troops and the job their doing. A rather good article from the Post Chronicle is here: http://b.casalemedia.com/V2/44508/50488/index.html?www.postchronicle.com/inc/pop1.html and from Yahoo (didn't stay up very long, you had to catch it quick): http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070222/ap_on_re_us/protesters_the_wall

    Iran has been sanctioned and has decided to pull a "Saddam" in thumbing it's collective nose at the sanctions AND Ahmadinajad has asked to speak at the UN on the day the Security council votes on a new resolution regarding those sanctions: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070316/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_nuclear

    The Little Red Book of Wisdom hits the shelves (I heard about this book on Hugh Hewitt's show, sounds like a GREAT read): here's where to get it: http://www.thelittleredbookofwisdom.com/

    Of course, Hugh's book, "A Mormon in the White House? 10 Things Every American should know about Mitt Romney", has also hit the shelves. Again, sounds like a good read, you can get it at Amazon.

    From the Twilight Zone, two Hillary quotes: "...But let me be clear, if George Bush doesn't end this war before he leaves office...when I'm President, I will." (Feb. 17, 2007 Press release, http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=1334) and “...remaining vital national security interests in Iraq” that would require a continuing deployment of American troops." (March 14, 2007 NY Times, "Clinton Sees Some Troops Staying in Iraq if She Is Elected", http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/14/washington/14cnd-clinton.html?_r=3&hp=&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin&oref=slogin)

    So, the question is, WHICH IS IT? I guess she wants us to believe you really CAN have it all, even when it's diametrically opposed.

    And finally, from NewsMax.com: Bill Clinton to NY Times: Stop Picking on Hillary (awwwww her wittle feelings are hurt!)--Read about it here: http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/3/16/111433.shtml?s=al&promo_code=2F64-1

    That's about all for now...If you see anything weird, contradictory or just plain outrageous, let's get it here for all to see!

    Miss Beth

    Sphere: Related Content

    The Duke On Immigration....

    The Duke On Immigration....
    The Duke Says it Best!

    They Sacrifice for US

    They Sacrifice for US
    DO NOT LET THEIR SACRIFICE BE IN VAIN!

    SOLDIER"S ANGELS

    SOLDIER"S ANGELS NEEDS YOUR HELP!

    The Veterans Hospital in Tucson needs our help!!! They have contacted Soldiers' Angels with a list of needs for their patients. Soldiers Angels needs your help in making some of these come true.

    Below you will find just a small portion of needs that are immediate. You can also find this list posted on the Soldiers Angels Forum at www.soldiersangelsforum.com you will be able to find lots of great information there for our deployed and vets.

    If you are sending a monetary donation please follow the link and indicate the State you are in.

    Donate here;
    Ttp://soldiersangels.org/index.php?page=veterans-support

    COMFORT ITEMS- $350/MO
    Dry Skin Cream
    Slipper Socks-No skid
    Catheter bag covers
    Shaving Cream
    Hand Lotion
    Baby Shampoo
    Hand Soap
    Roll on/Spray Deodorant
    Denture Cleaner
    Underwear (men and women (all sizes)
    Toothbrushes
    Denture Grip
    Socks (white)
    Talcum Powder
    Nail Clippers
    Toothpaste
    Ladies hand and body lotion
    Backpacks
    Disposable Razors
    Comb/Brushes
    Shawls
    Shaving Cream/small
    Knitted Caps
    Travel Alarm Clocks
    Ball Caps
    Tote Bags
    Shower Shoes
    Pocket Size Needle and Thread Kit
    Heart pillows for cardiac patients
    Lap Robes (3x5 or 5x7)

    GUEST SERVICES
    30 cup coffee makers
    Coffee supplies (reg. & decaf)
    Music CDs
    Stamps
    Writing Paper and Envelopes
    Prepaid Phone Cards for patients’

    RECREATION
    Puzzle books
    Crossword Puzzles
    Pencils
    Video tapes & DVDs (movies, educational)
    DVD Player

    Sports equipment (basketball, tennis rackets &
    Tickets for entertainment & sporting events
    Balls, badminton set, Frisbees, football)

    If you can send just one item that would be great!!! If each person sends one thing we will make a difference! They are also needing those who can volunteer time at the hospital just contact the Voluntary Services Dept. For information.

    Mail Items to:

    Department of Veterans Affairs Southern Arizona VA Health Care System – Voluntary Services 9-135, 3601 S. Sixth Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85723


    PLEASE HELP US HELP THOSE WHO FOUGHT FOR OUR FREEDOM!

    Surrender is NOT An Option Banner

    Surrender is NOT An Option Banner

    My Favorite Speeches and Other Items of Interest

    • George Bush's March 28, 2007 Discusses Economy, War on Terror During Remarks to the National Cattlemen's Beef Association;http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/03/20070328-2.html
    • Mitch McConnell's March 15, 2007 Funding For Troops, Not Timelines for Retreat; http://mcconnell.senate.gov/record.cfm?id=270747&start=1
    • Ronald Reagan's June 12, 1987 Tear Down This Wall Speech; http://www.reaganfoundation.org/reagan/speeches/wall.asp
    • Vice President Cheney's March 12, 2007 Remarks at the AIPAC 2007 Policy Conference; http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/03/20070312.html

    Winston Churchill Quotes

    • A prisoner of war is a man who tries to kill you and fails, and then asks you not to kill him.
    • Although personally I am quite content with existing explosives, I feel we must not stand in the path of improvement.
    • Although prepared for martyrdom, I preferred that it be postponed.
    • Attitude is a little thing that makes a big difference.
    • Battles are won by slaughter and maneuver. The greater the general, the more he contributes in maneuver, the less he demands in slaughter.
    • Danger - if you meet it promptly and without flinching - you will reduce the danger by half. Never run away from anything. Never!
    • I always seem to get inspiration and renewed vitality by contact with this great novel land of yours which sticks up out of the Atlantic.
    • I am an optimist. It does not seem too much use being anything else.
    • I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat.
    • I like a man who grins when he fights.
    • I was only the servant of my country and had I, at any moment, failed to express her unflinching resolve to fight and conquer, I should at once have been rightly cast aside.
    • If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time-a tremendous whack.
    • In war as in life, it is often necessary when some cherished scheme has failed, to take up the best alternative open, and if so, it is folly not to work for it with all your might.
    • It is no use saying, 'We are doing our best.' You have got to succeed in doing what is necessary.
    • Moral of the Work. In war: resolution. In defeat: defiance. In victory: magnanimity. In peace: goodwill.
    • Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few.
    • Never, never, never give up.
    • No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism.
    • One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half. Never run away from anything. Never!
    • Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.
    • Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.
    • The first quality that is needed is audacity.
    • The nose of the bulldog has been slanted backwards so that he can breathe without letting go.
    • The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is.
    • There is no such thing as public opinion. There is only published opinion.
    • These are not dark days: these are great days - the greatest days our country has ever lived.
    • They are decided only to be undecided, resolved to be irresolute, adamant for drift, solid for fluidity, all-powerful to be impotent.
    • True genius resides in the capacity for evaluation of uncertain, hazardous, and conflicting information.
    • Victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival.
    • War is a game that is played with a smile. If you can't smile, grin. If you can't grin, keep out of the way till you can.
    • War is mainly a catalogue of blunders.
    • We shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender.
    • We shall draw from the heart of suffering itself the means of inspiration and survival.
    • When the eagles are silent the parrots begin to jabber.
    • When you are winning a war almost everything that happens can be claimed to be right and wise.
    • You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.

    Ronald Reagan Quotes

    • "The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's just that they know so much that isn't so."
    • Above all, we must realize that no arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women. It is a weapon our adversaries in today's world do not have.
    • All the waste in a year from a nuclear power plant can be stored under a desk.
    • Approximately 80% of our air pollution stems from hydrocarbons released by vegetation, so let's not go overboard in setting and enforcing tough emission standards from man-made sources
    • Come here to this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!
    • Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty.
    • Double, no triple, our troubles and we'd still be better off than any other people on earth. It is time that we recognized that ours was, in truth, a noble cause.
    • Facts are stupid things.
    • Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.
    • Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law under God is acknowledged.
    • Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves.
    • Governments tend not to solve problems, only to rearrange them.
    • History teaches that war begins when governments believe the price of aggression is cheap.
    • How can a president not be an actor?
    • How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.
    • I have wondered at times what the Ten Commandments would have looked like if Moses had run them through the US Congress.
    • I will stand on, and continue to use, the figures I have used, because I believe they are correct. Now, I'm not going to deny that you don't now and then slip up on something; no one bats a thousand.
    • In Israel, free men and women are every day demonstrating the power of courage and faith. Back in 1948 when Israel was founded, pundits claimed the new country could never survive. Today, no one questions that. Israel is a land of stability and democracy in a region of tryanny and unrest.
    • Let us ask ourselves; "What kind of people do we think we are?".
    • Man is not free unless government is limited.
    • My philosophy of life is that if we make up our mind what we are going to make of our lives, then work hard toward that goal, we never lose - somehow we win out.
    • No mother would ever willingly sacrifice her sons for territorial gain, for economic advantage, for ideology.
    • Of the four wars in my lifetime, none came about because the U.S. was too strong.
    • Our forbearance should never be misunderstood. Our reluctance for conflict should not be misjudged as a failure of will. When action is required to preserve our national security, we will act.
    • Protecting the rights of even the least individual among us is basically the only excuse the government has for even existing.
    • Some people wonder all their lives if they've made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem.
    • The ultimate determinant in the struggle now going on for the world will not be bombs and rockets but a test of wills and ideas - a trial of spiritual resolve: the values we hold, the beliefs we cherish and the ideals to which we are dedicated.
    • The United Sates has much to offer the third world war.
    • There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.
    • To paraphrase Winston Churchill, I did not take the oath I have just taken with the intention of presiding over the dissolution of the world's strongest economy.
    • Today we did what we had to do. They counted on America to be passive. They counted wrong.
    • We are never defeated unless we give up on God.
    • We have the duty to protect the life of an unborn child.
    • We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions.
    • We will always remember. We will always be proud. We will always be prepared, so we will always be free.
    • Within the covers of the Bible are the answers for all the problems men face.
    • You know, if I listened to Michael Dukakis long enough, I would be convinced we're in an economic downturn and people are homeless and going without food and medical attention and that we've got to do something about the unemployed.

    Eleanor Roosevelt Quotes

    • No one can make you feel inferior without your consent

    I'm One-Are You?

    NEVER Submit

    NEVER Submit

    Miss Beth's Victory Dance Headline Animator

    Paypal

    Global Incident Map

    When you click on the website link below, a world Map comes up showing what strange & dangerous things are happening right now in every country in the entire world & is updated every few minutes.


    This "map" updates every 310 seconds...constantly--24/7, 365.

    The link: http://www.globalincidentmap.com/home.php

    Concentrated Evil

    Recent Comments

    Gifts From the Heart Store

    DTBN

    My Headlines

    Subscribe via email

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Blog Archive

    Blog Catalog

    Find Me On Facebook

    Kateri E. Jordan's Facebook profile

    Twitter Updates

    Faves and Raves

    Candidates on Immigration Information

    Make YOUR Voice Heard!

    Find Federal Officials
    Enter ZIP Code:

    or Search by State

    Find State Officials
    Enter ZIP Code:

    or Search by State

    Contact The Media
    Enter ZIP Code:

    or Search by State

    Stop the ACLU!-Click Here

    BraveNet Counter 1

    Goodcounter

    Go to casino where you'll find the best casino information.

    More Maxine...

    Max9

    Maxine...

    It"s "...one nation UNDER GOD..." or bite my skinny old ass and leave! Max8

    Support Our Troops-Click Here

    [google68fa612964682dda.html]
    This layout made by and copyright cmbs.