Boston-Bombings-A-First-Look: Debunking CAIR'S Testimony to the Homeland Security Cmte.

CAIR submitted thirteen pages of written testimony to the United States House Committee on Homeland Security.  In my view, the major thrust of the testimony is condemnation of alleged profiling & entrapment.  I see it as equivalent to the Mafia telling the committee how organized crime should be investigated and prosecuted. Uncle Vladdi suggested this, with which I agree:  Or, the Nuremberg trials being boycotted until they were conducted by only officially Nazi-vetted "prosecutors" (conciliators) "because otherwise they might be prejudiced by bigots and lack legitimacy!"

    If you desire to read the testimony, use the thirteen pages link above to download it in pdf format.  I am extracting a few statements exemplary of al-Taqiyya & kitman to refute. [Emphasis added for clarity.]

Targeting al-Qaeda-Inspired Violent Extremism

Violent extremism is not limited to any one ethnicity, political ideology or religion. In January, the West Point Military Academy’s Combating Terrorism Center reported that since 2001, violent white supremacists and other far-right groups have murdered 306 Americans and injured another 1,616.ⁱ Since the events of September 11, individuals associated with or inspired by al-Qaeda or similar groups have committed 37 murders in the U.S., out of the 180,000 murders committed during that time.ⁱⁱ Moreover, since 1979 environmental and animal rights extremists have committed over 2,000 crimes and caused more than $110 million in damage.ⁱⁱⁱ

    Terrorism is not limited to the USA. It is performed all over the world.  Most of it is done by Muslims. The two attacks on the World Trade Center were not done by right wingers or Christians.  The attempted Times Square bombing was not plotted by a Jew.  Numerous foiled plots were planned and almost carried out by Muslims. The Boston Marathon bombing was carried out by Muslims, motivated by their religion. 

    No matter what anyone else does or has done, Islam; off the shelf, normative, as revealed and exemplified by Moe, motivates Muslims to maim, mutilate, kill and enslave.  Since 623, 270*10⁶ lost their lives to Islamic imperialism. 

Violent Extremism

    Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam predating the formation of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood and its offshoot, al-Qaeda.  Allah said in the Qur'an that he would and did "cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve" and described the consequences of that act.  Allah commanded Muslims to strike terror into the hearts of disbelievers by building a mighty army and harsh treatment of defeated victims.   Allah promised to reward Muslims who take any step to injure or enrage disbelievers. 

    Moe said that he was made victorious by terror cast into the hearts of his enemies.  Allah said that Moe was an excellent example to emulate if one desired admission to his celestial bordello.

    Terrorism is not extremism; it is normative Islam, commanded by Allah and exemplified by his Messenger. Moe terrorized his victims by harsh treatment of defeated people and assassinations.  He also dictated & dispatched explicit extortion letters.

al-Qaeda-Inspired

    Terrorist groups do not inspire terrorism, they draw attention to Allah's imperatives, threat & promise, which motivate believers to do his wet work. They remind believers of the fard al-kifaya of participation in annual attacks against infidels. 

    While al-Qaeda and other groups exploit real and perceived provocations and grievances to pressure believers to engage in violence,  Allah's imperatives, threat & promise and Moe's exemplary conduct are the real sources of the terrorist impulse. 

For the government to responsibly counter domestic acts of terrorism carried out or inspired by al-Qaeda or similar groups it is important for law enforcement to develop a uniform and shared understanding of the ideology that motivates al-Qaeda’s violent extremism as opposed to the religious beliefs and principles of Islam.

ideology

   

• Only Allah has the right to be worshiped.  3:2
• Only Allah has the right to legislate & rule, which he delegated to Moe and his successors. 33:36
• Jihad is ordained for Muslims. 2:216
• War must be waged against pagans until only Allah is worshiped on a global scale. 8:39
• War must be waged against Jews & Christians until they are subjugated & extorted. 9:29
• Acts of terrorism are credited to the terrorist as righteous good deeds. 9:120
  
• The blood and property of infidels ain't not sacred to Muslims. Infidels only acquire human rights when they become Muslims. Bukhari 1.8.387
• The basic penalty for "waging war against Allah and his Messenger" is execution. 5:33 
• "waging war against Allah and his Messenger" includes disbelief  http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//5.13751.html

religious beliefs and principles of Islam

    The bullet points immediately above this heading contain bold blue underlined text: hyperlinks to authentic Islamic sources including the Qur'an, Sahih Bukhari and Tafsir Ibn Kathir.  The imperatives, threat & promise laid down in Surahs Al-anfal & At-Taubah, confirmed in authentic hadith and codified in Shari'ah, are religious beliefs and principles of Islam.

    Anyone wishing to understand the ideology of Islam should read The Prophet of Doom  in addition to the texts linked above. .

Islam prohibits extremism and an essential part of the faith is moderation. The Quran, Islam's foundational holy text, states: "We made you to be a community of the middle way, so that (with the example of your lives) you might bear witness to the truth before all mankind." (Quran, 2:143)

Extremism prohibited 

    Moe massacred the men and boys of a Jewish settlement after they had surrendered following a two week siege. Read more about it here: http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//33.41512.html . Moe did that; exemplary, moderate Islam, not extremism, which would be prohibited.

8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

47:4. So, when you meet (in fight Jihâd in Allâh's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives). Thereafter (is the time) either for generosity (i.e. free them without ransom), or ransom (according to what benefits Islâm), until the war lays down its burden. Thus [you are ordered by Allâh to continue in carrying out Jihâd against the disbelievers till they embrace Islâm (i.e. are saved from the punishment in the Hell-fire) or at least come under your protection], but if it had been Allâh's Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allâh, He will never let their deeds be lost,

genocide

   What does Allah want?  Genocide: "great slaughter"; "killed and wounded many of them". What did Moe want? Ransom & plunder: "the good of this world".  Can you get a clue?  Genocide is moderate, normative Islam, not extremism.  There is nothing wrong with the massacres of Hindus, Assyrians & Armenians, Allah demanded "great slaughter".  Got a clue yet?

radicalization

The Marathon’s accused bombers, Tamerlan, 26, and Dzhokhar, 19, Tsarnaev, journey to violent extremism had in part begun online through social networking sites linked to al-Qaeda-inspired videos and content. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has told investigators that he and his brother learned to build the improvised explosive devices (IEDs) used in the Boston attacks from the English-language online magazine Inspire, circulated by al-Qaeda's Yemen branch, and were influenced partly by the online sermons of Anwar al-Awlaki, an al-Qaeda linked leader.iv It has been reported that Tamerlan had posted to his personal YouTube account a video extolling al-Qaeda.”^v The Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) also allege that Tamerlan was in contact by message board with at least two individuals who were killed in a battle by Russian security forces in the Russian republic of Dagestan in 2012.^vi

Radicalizer

1998 & 1999: Serves as vice president of Charitable Society for Social Welfare Inc., the U.S. branch of a Yemeni charity headed by Abdul Majeed al-Zindani. Federal prosecutors in a New York terrorism-financing case later describe the charity as “a front organization” that was “used to support al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden.”

After Sept. 11: Attends Muslim outreach luncheon at the Secretary of the Army’s Office of General Counsel, according to documents obtained by Fox News.

Feb. 5, 2002: Awlaki delivers lecture to senior Defense officials at the Pentagon on Islam and Middle Eastern politics and popular culture. See here.  http://awlaki.sethhettena.com/

   
    How could such a nice, moderate Imam radicalize the brothers Tsarnaev, after all, the Pentagon reached out to him.  Didn't he lead prayers for the Islamic Congressional Staffers, too? 

    Do you believe? Then you sold your soul and life to Allah in return for admission to Paradise. Prove your faith and zeal: Allah tests them by fighting.

    There are no radicals or extremists; only believers. There is no radicalization process; there is learning of Allah's imperatives, threat & promise and Moe's excellent example.

moderate Islam

    Snake Excrement!!! No such entity exists; Islam is what it is: Moe's authentic interpretation of his recitation as enshrined in the Qur'an & exemplified in his Sunnah. 

moderate Muslims

  Whose  "faith will not go beyond their throats (i.e. they will have no faith) and will go out from (leave) their religion as an arrow goes out of the game. So, where-ever you find them, kill them, for who-ever kills them shall have reward on the Day of Resurrection."

Security

    Security is not surveillance, security cameras, investigations or infiltrating mosques.  Security is eliminating enemy personnel from within our borders.  If you want to be sure that some G'd'd Muslim will not run you over with his auto, shoot you, stab you or dismember you with a bomb, then send them all home and exclude them from entry.  No Muslim students, technical workers, medical specialists, religious workers or tourists.  No Muslims!  Expel them and exclude them. 

    Raccoons and skunks carry rabies and knock over trash cans. Muslims maim and kill. Its what they do when they obey Allah and emulate his Profit;.  Put a bounty on them if you want to be safe at home. 

Sphere: Related Content

Unthinking Regression: Bashing Santorum over 'Islamophobia'

http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/01/05/398688/santorum-islam-eradicate/... Think Progress uttered & published a nasty diatribe against Rick Santorum. Thanks and a tip of the hat to Bare Naked Islam. UPDATED With Audio: Rick Santorum’s Islamophobia Problem By Ali Gharib on Jan 5, 2012 at 5:33 pm right-wing That is one of the favorite slurs of LibTards. The connotation is Nazi~fascist but there is no linkage between Conservatism and National Socialism or fascism. The Declaration of Independence & Constitution are not related to Mein Kampf. attitude toward Islam Given the Author's name, it is easy to predict what follows. Anyone not in love with Islam must be extremely evil. endorsed profiling When we hear hoof beats, do we look out for unicorns? The Magnificent Nineteen were all Muslims. They pronounced Takbir while slitting the throats of the flight crews. Their leader ordered them to do so: "Shout, 'Allahu Akbar,' because this strikes fear in the hearts of the non-believers.". The man who co-ordinated Atta's martyrdom operation proudly declared that the attack was done as an act of worship: "These actions are our offerings to God." The fine art of hijacking airliners was popularized and perfected by Muslims. Why then should the attention of the TSA be directed anywhere other than towards Muslims? We could save a great deal of time, money and hassle by simply banning Muslims from mass transit vehicles and terminals. “radical Islam” Islam does not require modifiers; I wish that everyone, including Rick Santorum, would quit wasting words and call it what it is: Islam. Use of modifiers such as "radical" falsely implies the existence of an anodyne, passive & benign normative Islam. Jihad, defined in Islamic law as: "to war against non-Muslims", is "ordained" for Muslims. "casting terror" is a battle tactic sanctified by Allah and bragged about by Moe. Muslims are promised extra credit (deed of righteousness) for any act taken to injure or enrage disbelievers. Genocidal jihad & terrorism are normative Islam, neither extreme nor radical; participation in them is a function of intense belief, neither innovation nor esoteric doctrine. conflates extremists with the entire Muslim faith The Magnificent Nineteen were believers, not extremists. Islam does not have extremists, it has believers who obey Allah and emulate Moe. all-encompassing ideology Islam is a "Deen": way of life. The Qur'an & hadith dictate everything from conception to burial. If you have any doubt, examine the table of contents of Sahih Buchari, the most authentic hadith collection, and Reliance of the Traveller, the handbook of Shari'ah. religious freedom Conquered Jews & Christians are not permitted to display crosses, ring bells, hold religious processions, pray or read the Bible aloud in public, build or maintain churches. Doubters & dissenters should read Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 11.5. It is assumed that Islam is a religion, and therefore we are obligated by the free exercise clause of the First Amendment, to permit Muslims to practice it here. Under that assumption, Muslims have a right to attack, plunder & kill us and enslave our widows & orphans. The ignorant masses are not cognizant of the fact that Islam entails those actions. Allah commanded Muslims to attack Jews and Christians; to wage war against them until they are subjugated and make annual extortion payments. That command is clear on the face of 9:29, confirmed by Moe in Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387 and codified in Islamic law by Reliance of the Traveller O9.8. Muslims are commanded to attack those disbelievers nearest them in 9:123. A minimum of one military expedition must be mounted in every year, and if neglected when possible, all who know of the obligation are in sin, specified in Reliance of the Traveller O9.1. Disbelieving men are killed; their widows & orphans enslaved as exemplified by 33:26-27 and codified in Reliance of the Traveller. O9.13 - 9.14. Islam is not "cafeteria Catholicism", it is all or nothing. This quote from 2:85 makes the matter crystal clear: "Then do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest? Then what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except disgrace in the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they shall be consigned to the most grievous torment." Muslims are threatened with "painful torment" in Hell if they shirk jihad and promised eternity in Allah's celestial bordello if they go to war. If a Muslim truly believes Allah's threat and promise, what will he do? Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387, besides confirming the jihad imperatives, has vital clues for you: you are the prey, its open season, and you have no rights, as made clear by these excerpts: "And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us " "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have." If Muslims have a right to practice Islam then our rights to life, liberty & property are abrogated; null and void. Which is it? One or the other, not both; either we have a right to live free and secure in our property or they have a right to practice Islam. Which is it? Dialogue The article quotes Santorum [Emphasis original.] Until we have the kind of discussion and dialogue with Islam — that democracy and freedom of religion, along with religious pluralism, are essential for the stability of the world and our ability to cohabit in this world. Unless Islam is willing to make that conscious decision, then we are going to be at war for a long time. . The proposed dialogue is useless because jihad is ordained for Muslims, required to be performed in every year until the last day or until the entire world is conquered, whichever comes first. Islam is theocratic, not democratic because only Allah has the right to legislate. Religious pluralism is out of the question because 3:2 "Allâh! Lâ ilahâ illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He), " Also Muslims are commanded to wage war until only Allah is worshiped on a global scale, in 8:39. If Muslims abandon jihad in favor of trade, commerce or agriculture, Allah will make disgrace to prevail over them. Islamophobia Phobia implies irrational fear or loathing. Fear and loathing of Islam are anything but irrational. Since 622, Islam has been responsible for 270*106 premature deaths. Both the doctrines of Islam enshrined in the Qur'an and the resulting conquest which built an empire that encompassed nearly half the world confirm the fact that Islam is a worthy object of fear & loathing. extremist ideologies The concluding paragraph demonstrates unwillingness to face the fatal fact of Islam. No decent American — or anyone across the globe — should oppose “eradicat(ing)” extremist ideologies like militant, “radical Islam.” But Santorum’s history of statements raises questions about just exactly what and who he’s targeting for eradication. The founder of Islam declared that he was: * ordered to fight * commanded to fight * made victorious by awe * made victorious by terror * and would prefer o to be martyred in Al1ah's Cause and then get resurrected and then get martyred, and then get resurrected again and then get martyred and then get resurrected again and then get martyred. That is not an extremist; that is not a radical; that is the role model for all Muslims to emulate, in all places, at all times. Normative Islam is defined by the Qur'an and exemplified by Moe's sunnah. As a wise man said "Its Islam, stupid!". Secure peace can not be established without eradicating Islam.

Sphere: Related Content

Obamanation: Treason in Turkey

REMARKS BY PRESIDENT OBAMA

TO THE TURKISH PARLIAMENT

Turkish Grand National Assembly Complex

Ankara, Turkey April 6, 2009

Because the speech presents a target rich environment this post will
concentrate on the issue of relations with Islam. I will block quote
relevant excerpts from the prepared remarks, linking my comments with
superscripts inserted into the excerpts.

Now, our two democracies are confronted by an unprecedented set of challenges: An economic crisis that recognizes no borders; extremism that leads to the killing of innocent men and women and children¹; strains on our energy supply and a changing climate; the proliferation of the world's deadliest weapons; and the persistence of tragic conflict².

In the Middle East, we share the goal of a lasting peace between Israel and its neighbors. Let me be clear: The United States strongly supports the goal of two states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security. That is a goal shared by Palestinians³,
Israelis, and people of goodwill around the world. That is a goal that the parties agreed to in the road map and at Annapolis. That is a goal that I will actively pursue as President of the United States.

Both must overcome longstanding passions and the politics of the moment⁴ to make progress towards a secure and lasting peace.

We must reject the use of terror⁵, and recognize that Israel's security concerns are legitimate.

Now, I have made it clear to the people and leaders of the Islamic
Republic of Iran that the United States seeks engagement based on
mutual interest and mutual respect⁶. We want Iran to play its rightful
role in the community of nations. Iran is a great civilization⁷. We want them to engage in the economic and political integration that brings prosperity and security. But Iran's leaders must choose whether they will try to build a weapon⁸ or build a better future for their people.

So both Turkey and the United States support a secure and united Iraq that does not serve as a safe haven for terrorists⁹.

Make no mistake, though: Iraq, Turkey, and the United States face a
common threat from terrorism¹⁰. That includes the al Qaeda terrorists who have sought to drive Iraqis apart and destroy their country. That includes the PKK. There is no excuse for terror against any nation.¹¹ (Applause.) As President, and as a NATO ally, I pledge that you will have our support against the terrorist activities of the PKK or anyone else. These efforts will be strengthened by the continued work to build ties of cooperation between Turkey, the Iraqi government, and Iraq's Kurdish leaders, and by your continued efforts to promote education and opportunity and democracy for the Kurdish population here inside Turkey.¹²

Finally, we share the common goal of denying al Qaeda a safe haven in Pakistan or Afghanistan. The world has come too far to let this region backslide, and to let al Qaeda terrorists¹³ plot further attacks. That's why we are committed to a more focused effort to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat al Qaeda¹⁴. That is why we are increasing our efforts to train Afghans to sustain their own security, and to reconcile former adversaries. That's why we are increasing our support for the people of Afghanistan and Pakistan, so that we stand on the side not only of security, but also of opportunity and the promise of a better life.¹⁵

I know there have been difficulties these last few years. I know that
the trust that binds the United States and Turkey has been strained,
and I know that strain is shared in many places where the Muslim faith is practiced. So let me say this as clearly as I can: The United States is not, and will never be, at war with Islam¹⁶. (Applause.) In fact, our partnership with the Muslim world¹⁷ is critical not just in rolling back the violent ideologies that people of all faiths reject¹⁸,
but also to strengthen opportunity for all its people.

I also want to be clear that America's relationship with the Muslim
community, the Muslim world, cannot, and will not, just be based upon opposition to terrorism¹⁹. We seek broader engagement based on mutual interest and mutual respect²⁰. We will listen carefully, we will bridge misunderstandings, and we will seek common ground²¹.
We will be respectful, even when we do not agree. We will convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith²², which has done so much over the centuries to shape the world -- including in my own country. The United States has been enriched by Muslim Americans²³. Many other Americans have Muslims in their families or have lived in a Muslim-majority country --I know, because I am one of them. (Applause.)

Our focus will be on what we can do, in partnership²⁴
with people across the Muslim world, to advance our common hopes and our common dreams.²⁵

There's an old Turkish proverb: "You cannot put out fire with flames."
America knows this. Turkey knows this. There's some who must be met by force, they will not compromise. But force alone cannot solve our problems, and it is no alternative to extremism²⁶. The future must belong to those who create, not those who destroy²⁷. That is the future we must work for, and we must work for it together.

---

1. 'Extremism' is a shibboleth which must be deflated. The violence perpetrated by Muslim 'terrorists' is an intrinsic part of orthodox Islam, founded on several
   ayat, notably 3:151, 8:12, 8:60 & 3:26. The message of those ayat is confirmed by two ahadith: Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.
2. 'Tragic conflict' persists because it is perpetuated by intrinsic and immutable
   doctrines of Islam. World conquest is mandatory, not optional under 2:216, 8:39 & 9:29.
3. The charters of the PLO and Hamas indicate otherwise, as does the familiar mantra "from the river to the sea".
4. The passions date back nearly 1400 years, to Moe's rejection by Jews living in the Hijaz who scorned his plagiarized mix of paganism, Christianity and
   Judaism. Allah said he would continually torment the Jews;
   and Moe said that the Muslims could not collect their reward until they finish exterminating the Jews. There will be no peace while Islam continues to propagate hatred and incite violence.
5. So genocide & policide are ok with President Obama as long as there is no
   terror; the means justify the ends. Islam's attitude is "we conquered
   it, its ours, and we will reconquer it if it takes till doomsday!".
   Click the link to the Hamas Charter in #3 and read it carefully.
6. There is no mutual respect. Islam is contemptuous of us and all non-Muslims.
   They are obligated to punish, humiliate and subjugate us, to defeat us
   and gather us into Hell. Is there some part of 8:55 & 3:12 that President
   Obama does not comprehend?
7. The Persian civilization was conquered by Islam; it is dead and gone, supplanted by pure, unmitigated evil which inculcates hatred and incites violence.
   Cyrus the Great permitted rebuilding the Temple at Jerusalem. Islam demands the destruction of Israel. President Obama seems to be oblivious to the difference.
8. That decision has been made, irrevocably. They must destroy Israel, and they need the bomb to accomplish that tactical objective.
9. If it is Islamic, it is a safe haven for terrorists. Islam and terrorism are one and the same. Moe was a terrorist, by his own admission, cited and linked in #1. Shari'ah is
   the primary source of law for the new constitution of Iraq. Get a clue.
10. Muslims practicing takfir will terrorize anyone they perceive as weak; unable or unwilling to effectively retaliate. Terrorism is intrinsic to Islam; the rule, not an exception. The texts linked in #1 make that perfectly clear.
11. Is there any excuse for conquest, rape, pillage, plunder & enslavement with or without inflicting terror? Please follow the links in #1 & #2.
12. Education, opportunity, democracy etc. are irrelevant. Terrorism is a function of
    doctrines, not grievances.
13. Al-Qaeda means "the base". Ummah al-Islamiya is the base of the pyramid of Islam. Islamic law requires a minimum of one military expedition against Kufar
    in every year. That requirement predates Abd al-Wahhab & co. Read chapter 9 of Book O of Umdat as-Salik.
14. So long as Islam exists, al-Qaeda can not be defeated, its fallen martyrs
    will always be replaced and resupplied.
15. They don't want opportunity and a better life, they want to conquer the entire world, obtaining Allah's approval and subsequent admission to the celestial bordello. Shari'ah is the primary source of law for Afghanistan's new
    constitution. Get a clue.
16. Islam is at war against Dar ul-Harb: the entire non-Muslim world; wherever
    Allah's writ does not rule. Follow the links in #2 and #13; read O9.8 & 9.9 Get a clue.
17. We have no partnership with Muslims, it is explicitly forbidden by several ayat including 3:118, 5:51, 58:22, & 60:1.
18. Violence is not part of an external ideology, it is intrinsic to Islam! Read the ayat linked in #2 and get a clue. Islam does not reject violence, it mandates it: "Jihad
    is ordained for you".
19. Good idea; we should also consider Jihad, genocide, misogyny and subjugation of Kufar, each and every one of which is ample cause for rejecting Islam.
20. There is no mutual respect. Refer to #6.
21. There is no common ground with Islam. Islam declares Allah to be the creator of the earth and everything on it; therefore sovereign over it and us. Allah
    has delegated to Islam the right to be regent over the entire world.
    Theologically, Islam denies the divinity, heritage, death & resurrection of Jesus Christ and co-opts him as a genocidal warmonger. These facts are fully documented in another blog post: The Defamation of Jesus Christ.
22. What does President Obama appreciate about Islam besides the sound of the Adhan at sunset? Could it be the 270 million untimely deaths it has caused?
23. Contributions made by individuals who may be Muslim in name only are not a legitimate source of pride for Islam.
24. Refer to #17.
25. Common dreams? Do we dream of world conquest; ruling and dominating the entire world? If you doubt me, read my blog post: ROPMA.
26. Extremism is a shibboleth. Standard, off the shelf orthodox Islam is violent because it is a demonic mandate to genocidal conquest using terror as a battle
    tactic. There is no alternative to war when we are attacked by Islam
27. Islam destroys, it does not create. Allah has pronounced an execration
    against the Muslims if they ever abandon Jihad in favor of productive pursuits.

Sphere: Related Content