Get Real, Jeffrey

One of my Google Alerts brought up this garbage:

Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.) condemns such calls for hatred against any identity group, any religion, and R.E.A.L. rejects calls by those who seek to deny anyone’s freedom of religion and freedom of worship.

We urge all those who hate to release the burden of hate from their hearts, and respect their fellow human beings and our universal human rights.

I was not able to find the wall post of which they complain. The older posts link was not functioning. The complaint concerns a wall post on SIOA's Facebook page. The post linked to a blog post about legal considerations for banning Islam.

A quick visit to the About Us link discovered a familiar name: Jeffrey Imm. I have read several articles written by him about Islamic supremacism, and I agreed with them.

Founder’s Summary:
Our non-partisan group is focused on a consistent support of our universal human rights in all parts of the world, with emphasis on these four areas:
– 1. ensuring religious freedom and pluralism / defying religious supremacism
– 2. supporting racial harmony / defying racial supremacism
– 3. supporting gender equality / defying misogyny
– 4. defending human liberty / defying totalitarianism

It is not possible to oppose supremacism, misogyny & totalitarianism without opposing Islam. Those three evils are all intrinsic and foundational to Islam.
Allah demands that Islam be made superior; dominant over all religions. That objective is to be obtained by offensive warfare. That warfare is the foundation of the relationship between Allah and Muslims.

Islam is a way of life: jihad-- predation upon the human race. If Muslims abandon jihad in favor of productive pursuits, Allah will curse them and not lift the curse until they return to jihad. Aggressive warfare, genocide & terrorism are intrinsic sacraments of Islam.

Islamic law requires a minimum of one or two military attacks on disbelievers in every year, failing only in a year when Islam lacks sufficient men or material.

"The least that the imam must do is that he allow no year to pass without having organised a military expedition by himself, or by his raiding parties, according to the Muslims' interest, so that the jihad will only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse."

If none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having performed it. In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.

The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, "Jihad is a communal obligation," meaning upon the Muslims each year. [Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.1]

Islam is misogynistic; women are property, literally fields to be plowed. Women inherit half as much as men, A woman's testimony is given half the weight of a man's. Islam permits wife beating.

Islam is totalitarian, it encompasses the entirety of human life, dictating everything from conception to burial. Only Allah has the right to be worshiped.
Only Allah has the right to rule.

Do you have a right to live? If so, then others have an obligation not to kill you. If you are a not Muslim and are not living as a dhimmi under a treaty of protection in return for paying extortion, then Islam is at war against you. Your blood and property are not sacred to Muslims.

Do you have a right to worship or not as you choose? If so, then others have an obligation not to interfere with your worship. But Muslims are obligated to fight you until only Allah is worshiped; until Jews and Christians are subjugated and extorted.

Islam is 180° out of phase with the values of Western Civilization. If it can't defeat us militarily, it will out breed us and defeat us demographically. Recent shootings, attempted bombings and vehicular assaults should be a clue for you.

Islam is not divisible; Muslims can not pick and choose the parts they like, they must accept the whole package. Islam is incapable of reform because the Qur'an is Allah's perfected word which can not be changed.

We need to get rid of Islam. So long as Islam wears the false mantle of religion, the free exercise clause of the First Amendment protects it. Only an amendment to the Constitution can remove that camouflage and enable Congress to outlaw Islam.

Here is something you can do: Outlaw Islam! Amend the U. S. Constitution to exclude Islam from the definition of religion. Copy the blog post with the petition text, signature link, and links to the evidence presented. Paste it into an email and broadcast it widely!!

There is something else you can do: demand enforcement of international human rights law.
ICCPR

Article 20

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.
2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.

The Qur'an is an egregious violation of those provisions, it can not be changed, so Islam must be outlawed.

Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide

Article 3

The following acts shall be punishable:

• (a) Genocide;
• (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
• (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;

8:67, which states that a Prophet must make a great slaughter before ransoming captives and 47:4, which directs Muslims to kill and wound "many of them" are obvious violations of 3(c) as the infamous genocide hadith.

Our only recourse is to demand that the World Court enforce those provisions, proscribing Islam by law. That is the mission of the International Qur'an Petition. If you love life and liberty, you will sign the International Qur'an Petition, copy it, paste it into an email, and send it to everyone you can hope to influence with an exhortation to sign and forward it.

While Muslims have a 'right' to practice Islam, all our rights are forfeit. It is not possible that there can be a right to attack, kill, rape, enslave and plunder.

Sphere: Related Content

Watch this SIOA Video

Bare Naked Islam posted this powerful video.. I want you to view it. I want you to share it with others. The electorate needs to know the truth about this issue. Geller & Spencer have started the ball rolling. BNI has boosted it. Others must kick the ball and keep it rolling. I am passing the ball to you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HY1o3_YCPg8&feature=player_embedded



In the video, Rifqa Barry pours out the heart of her story, one of honor killing. Honoricide is widely considered to be a cultural issue separate from Islam. Those harboring that misconception ignore the fact that Islam is not a religion, it is an all-encompassing way of life. In fact, Islamic law is not silent on this issue.
Under Islamic law, Rifqa's father can kill her with impunity. The following quote is from Reliance of the Traveller.

-4- a father or mother (or their fathers of mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring's offspring;

That quote is part of a list of killings for which there is no indemnity (blood money). The list is given in Book O, Chapter 1.2.

Rifqa Barry is subject to the death penalty for rebellion against Allah. In Islam's eyes she deserves to be killed.

O8.1

When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.

O8.2

In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph (A: or his representative) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.

O8.4

There is no indemnity for killing an apostate (O: or any expiation, since it is killing someone who deserves to die).

O4.2

The indemnity for killing a male Muslim is 100 camels.

Pay particular attention to the clauses I emphasized in the quote below; they speak directly to the issue of inequality.

O4.9

(A: For the rulings below, one multiplies the fraction named by the indemnity appropriate to the death or injury's type of intentionality and other relevant circumstances that determine the amount of a male Muslim's indemnity (def: o4.2-6 and o4.13). )

The indemnity for the death or injury of a woman is one-half the indemnity paid for a man.

The indemnity paid for a Jew or Christian is one-third of the indemnity paid for a Muslim. The indemnity paid of a Zoroastrian is one-fifteenth of that a Muslim.

When a miscarriage results from someone having struck the stomach of a pregnant woman (O: or other part of her, or when someone frightens her, resulting in a miscarriage), the indemnity for the fetus is a male or female slave worth one-twentieth of the indemnity payable for killing the fetus's father, or one-tenth that of its mother. (A: The indemnity is whatever they agree upon.)

Is this clear to you yet? Killing a male Muslim will cost you 100 camels. Killing a female Muslim will cost you 33 camels. Killing a Christian will cost you 33 camels. Killing an apostate is free. Killing your own offspring is free. Get a clue, for Chrissake!!!

Every time a Muslim, politician, preacher, commentator or academic tells you that Islam:

• is great
• is a religion
• is peaceful
• is an equally valid pathway to God
• respects human dignity
• respects human equality

he or she is a damn liar deserving all the contempt & detestation you can muster. Voting for such a politician is a suicidal act of treason.

Sphere: Related Content