John Brennan Spews Again!

On Wednesday, May 26, '10, The President's terrorism adviser once again served up ample evidence of Obamination's treason. His latest spew of feces occurred before the Center For Strategic & International Studies.

The CSPAN video indicates a run time of 57 minutes.



VPR News has a description of the speech and a transcript link. Unfortunately, that is not a transcript of the speech, it does include a few quotes. The video I found is high definition, and loads too slow on my connection. I can't pause and rewind it, so I can't create an accurate transcript.

Ahh, the fine print. I finally found the well concealed transcript link. The transcript is in the form of a 20 page pdf file.

Brennan tells how he previously outlined the new administration's policy, identifying two principle challenges.

1. First, the immediate near-term challenge of destroying al-Qaida and its extremist affiliates.
2. And second, the longer-term challenge of confronting violent extremism generally, including the political, economic and social forces that can sometimes put individuals on the path toward militancy.

Fallacy #1: al-Qaida is not the enemy; it is a subset of the the Muslim Brotherhood, which is a subset of the enemy: Islam. Fallacy #2: Violence is intrinsic to Islam, it is neither extreme nor innovative. Fallacy #4: Islamic violence is doctrine driven, not grievance driven.

The doctrines which sanctify and mandate aggressive world conquest are found in the Qur'an: Al-Baqarah 216 makes it mandatory, not optional. Al-Anfal 39 commands Muslims to fight pagans until all resistance ceases and Allah has a monopoly. Muslims and their apologists will swear that those verses don't mean that, are taken out of context, misapplied, mistranslated and misinterpreted. Ibn Kathir, who spent his adult life studying and teaching the Qur'an & hadith, has a different take on those verses and Moe confirmed their obvious meaning. The final clincher: Islamic law codifies them.

• Jihad is required in all Conditions
• The Order to fight to eradicate Shirk and Kufr
• The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah
• Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387
• http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO9-8.html The caliph makes war on Jews... codification of 9:29.
• http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO9-9.html The caliph fights all other people... codification of 8:39.

When Muslims do their wet work, they shout the takbir, as if they were sacrificing a goat for eid. They think they are doing Allah's will, the best of good deeds. Why is that? The answer is in the Qur'an, Surah At-Taubah 120. "...they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor hunger in the Cause of Allah, nor they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness. ". [Emphasis and link added.] When a Muslim does anything to anger or injure a disbeliever, he gets brownie points. This should be a clue for you.

Brennan goes on to tell us how President Obama is clear about the threat we face, following up with a weak excuse for his misidentification of the enemy.

The president’s strategy is absolutely clear about the threat we face. Our enemy is not terrorism because terrorism is but a tactic. Our enemy is not terror because terror is a state of mind and, as Americans, we refuse to live in fear. Nor do we describe our enemy as jihadists or Islamists because jihad is holy struggle, a legitimate tenet of Islam meaning to purify oneself of one’s community.

Terrorism is a tactic, a fact so obvious as to require no restatement. "jihadist" & "islamists" are smokescreens commonly used to divert our attention from the real enemy: Muslims; Islam's true believers. The last clause in the quote is a form of kitman: dissimulation by obfuscation. Brennan intentionally conflates jihad an-Nafs with jihad asghar, to the exclusion of the effective definition. To make the extent of Brennan's deception clear to you, I will quote two relevant definitions of jihad. The first is from the translator's notes to Surah Al-Baqarah 190. That ayeh is related to defensive jihad, when Dar ul-Islam is invaded, but the definition is not, it relates to offensive jihad on Islamic initiative. I can't explain their placement of the footnote, I just report it.

(V.2:190) Al-Jihâd (holy fighting) in Allâh’s Cause (with full force of numbers and weaponry) is given the utmost importance in Islâm and is one of its pillar (on which it stands). By Jihâd Islâm is established, Allâh’s Word is made superior, (His Word being Lâ ilaha illallâh which means none has the right to be worshipped but Allâh), and His Religion (Islâm) is propagated. By abandoning Jihâd (may Allâh protect us from that) Islâm is destroyed and the Muslims fall into an inferior position; their honour is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihâd is an obligatory duty in Islâm on every Muslim, and he who tries to escape from this duty, or does not in his innermost heart wish to fulfil this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite.
Narrated ‘Abdullâh bin Mas‘ûd رضي الله عنه: I asked Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم "O Allâh’s Messenger! What is the best deed?" He replied, "To offer the Salât (prayers) at their early fixed stated times." I asked, "What is next in goodness?" He replied, "To be good and dutiful to your parents." I further asked, "What is next in goodness?" He replied, "To participate in Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause." I did not ask Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم anymore and if I had asked him more, he would have told me more. (Sahih Al-Bukhâri, Vol.4, Hadîth No.41).

Let that sink in for a moment, then re-read it until it becomes clear to you. The second definition is from Islamic law: Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.0. It does not have named anchors for linking, but it is documented here: http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO9-0.html .

Chapter O9.0: Jihad

(O: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad.

``We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad.''

The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as:

-1- ``Fighting is prescribed for you'' (Koran 2:216);

-2- ``Slay them wherever you find them'' (Koran 4:89);

-3- ``Fight the idolators utterly'' (Koran 9:36);

and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari and Muslim that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:

``I have been commanded to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah'';

and the hadith reported by Muslim,

``To go forth in the morning or evening to fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and everything in it.''Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were forty-seven in number.) [Emphasis and links added.]

Will you kill anyone else or be killed in your struggle against your ego? How?? I have added emphasis to Surah At-Taubah 111 to make things clear for you.

Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh's Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur'ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .

Like Obama, Brennan knows no shame, there is no limit to his deception.

And there is nothing holy or legitimate or Islamic about murdering innocent men, women and children. Indeed, characterizing our adversaries this way would actually be counterproductive. It would play into the false perception that they are religious leaders defending a holy cause when in fact, they are nothing more than murderers, including the murder of thousands upon thousands of Muslims.

I added emphasis to one word in that quote to make it stand out because it illustrates one of the methods by which Muslims and their apologists practice deception. Who is innocent? By definition, only Muslims can be innocent. Surah Al-Ma'idah' 33 lists the punishments prescribed for those who wage war against Allah. Ibn Kathir's Tafsir defines that term. "`Wage war' mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. " [Emphasis added.] If you do not believe in Allah, you are rebelling against him, not innocent.

If you did not follow the link to Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387, when I presented it earlier, do it now. What makers our blood sacred to Muslims, so that they can't kill us with impunity? Why does Islam forbid killing women and children in combat? Only because they are "property for Muslims". If you still harbor doubts, read this: http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO9-13.html.


The lies keep flowing.

Moreover, describing our enemy in religious terms would lend credence to the lie propagated by al-Qaida and its affiliates to justify terrorism, that the United States is somehow at war against Islam. The reality, of course, is that we have never been and will never be at war with Islam. After all, Islam, like so many faiths, is part of America.

True, we have not declared war on Islam, but we need to because Islam declared and is waging war against us. Evidently Brennan is not aware of the Barbary Wars. The Barbary Pirates were Muslims, who attacked our shipping for economic reasons, using the Qur'an as a rationalization. Wikipedia has the details for you.

It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every muslim who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise. He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy's ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once. ^{[2] [3]}

Right and duty to plunder and enslave--where did they get such an idea? I will quote a fragment from Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386: "Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:-- "Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master."".

Brennan, like President Obama, believes that we are stupid, ignorant, gullible fools incapable of reasoning.

Instead, the president’s strategy is clear and precise. Our enemy is al-Qaida and its terrorist affiliates. For it was al-Qaida who attacked us so viciously on 9/11 and whose desire to attack the United States, our allies and our partners remains undiminished. And it is its affiliates who have take up al-Qaida’s call to arms against the United States and other parts of the world.
The president’s strategy is unequivocal with regard to our posture. The United States of America is at war. We are at war against al-Qaida and its terrorist affiliates. That is why the president is responsibly ending the war in Iraq, which had nothing to do with 9/11 and why he has refocused our efforts on Afghanistan, where al-Qaida continues to plot from the tribal regions along the border with Pakistan and inside of Pakistan.

We have a clear mission. We will not simply degrade al-Qaida.'s capabilities or simply prevent terrorist attacks against our country or citizens. We will not merely respond after the fact, after an attack that has been attempted. Instead, the United States will disrupt, dismantle and ensure a lasting defeat of al-Qaida and violent extremist affiliates.

.
Once they tell a lie, they repeat it, believing as the Nazis did, that repetition will bring about wide spread belief. Al-Qaida is not a separate organization, it is an alias for Islam. It is one of the branches of the Muslim Brotherhood. Another branch of al-Iqhwan has in their charter, words which expose the awful reality which Brennan & Obama wish we would never learn about.

Allah is its target, the Prophet is its model, the Koran its constitution: Jihad is its path and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of its wishes.

Arrogant narcissists can't stop lying.

We will build positive partnerships with Muslim communities around the world. And most importantly, we will protect our homeland.

We can't build partnerships with Muslims because Allah explicitly forbids it. I will quote one of several ayat which make this fact clear to those willing to read and learn.

60:1. O you who believe! Take not My enemies and your enemies (i.e. disbelievers and polytheists, etc.) as friends, showing affection towards them, while they have disbelieved in what has come to you of the truth (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism, this Qur'ân, and Muhammad ), and have driven out the Messenger (Muhammad ) and yourselves (from your homeland) because you believe in Allâh your Lord! If you have come forth to strive in My Cause and to seek My Good Pleasure, (then take not these disbelievers and polytheists, etc., as your friends). You show friendship to them in secret, while I am All-Aware of what you conceal and what you reveal. And whosoever of you (Muslims) does that, then indeed he has gone (far) astray, (away) from the Straight Path .

Arrogant narcissists repeatedly return to their favorite lies.

The president’s national security strategy also outlines how we will strengthen other tools of American power which will help us meet many challenges. This includes addressing the political, economic and social forces that can make some people fall victim to the cancer of violent extremism.

Through a renewed commitment to diplomacy and in contrast to terrorists who offer the false hope of change through violence, we seek to show that legitimate grievances can be resolved peacefully through democratic institutions and dialogue, whether in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan or between Israelis and Palestinians, where the continuing conflict undermines moderates and strengthens extremists across the region.

'Violent extremism" is a lie. Moe set the standard for Islam in all places, at all times with his recitation & Sunnah. You need to read the Qur'an & hadith to learn what that standard is. In the last 9 years of his life, Moe started 86 battles. Does that give you a clue?

Jihad is about obedience to Allah & emulation of Moe, not "legitimate grievances". The Falestinians do not have legitimate grievances, Israel has them: repeated conquests, including that of Caliph Umar in 638 deprived the Jews of their homeland. Their legitimate grievance had a hope of redress when the Balfour Declaration was published. Hope turned to frustration when Britain reneged, giving most of their patrimony to the Hasemites.

Since 1948 Muslims have been attempting genocide and politicide against Israel. That gives Israel the right to defend herself, which does not give rise to legitimate Falestinian grievances.


The same old lie rears its ugly head again.

Through new partnerships to promote development in places like Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia, we are working to foster good governance, reduce corruption and improve education, health and basic services, all of which helps undermine the forces that can put the disillusioned and disposed on the path to militancy.

Muslims are explicitly forbidden to take kuffar as partners. Muslims must be dominant, not submissive in any relationship. We can not foster good governance, because Islam is feudalism. Only Allah and his messenger have the right to rule, and their rule must be extended over the entire globe. If you could make them prosperous, you would only enable them to build and equip larger armies with which to attack us.

Repetition does not convert a lie into truth.

We have also seen individuals, including American citizens, apparently inspired by al-Qaida’s ideology, take matters into their own hands.

The ideology belongs to Islam, not to any sub-set. "Only Allah has the right to be worshiped.". That is the idea at the base of the system, the bedrock foundation. Allah's word must be "made superior", that is, dominant. Supremacy is gained through armed conquest. Muslims are obligated to conquer and subjugate the entire world. That is fard al-kifaya, binding upon all able bodied adult male Muslims until a sufficient number have reported to the front. Jihad must be undertaken in every year, failing only when there is insufficient manpower or material.


Common sense dictates that predators must be eradicated. Because Islam is a predator, it must be eradicated. Because President Obama is a Muslim, he can not acknowledge that reality. Because President Bush was in the purse of the Saudi's, he could not acknowledge that reality. The fatal fact is that we can never obtain peace or security while there is Islam on this earth. Obama and Brennan can not acknowledge that fatal fact.

Instead of giving into fear and paralysis, which is the goal of terrorists, we must resolve, as a nation, as a people, that we will go forward with confidence, that we will resist succumbing to overreaction, especially to failed attacks and not magnify these perpetrators beyond the despicable miscreants that they are, that as a proud and strong nation, we will not cower in the face of a small band of cowards who hide in the shadows and send others to their slaughter and to slaughter the innocents.

Please explain to me how a "small band of cowards" conquered an empire that extended from the border of China to the border of France. How the Hell did a tiny minority raise an army willing and able to conquer India? Explain to me how they slaughtered up to 90 million Hindus. Explain how, in less than 1400 years, they slaughtered 270*10⁶ people.

It is not al-Qaida. It is not "terrorists". It is not "extremists". It is not "radicals". It is believers: Muslims who bought the evil of Islam hook, line and sinker [8:2, 9:111, 24:62, 49:15 ]. If we don't get them out of this country and off of this planet, we will never have peace and security and we will eventually be conquered and enslaved. This is a reality that our cowardly politicians can not acknowledge because that acknowledgment would subject them to charges of advocacy of genocide. Either Muslims cease believing or cease living or we will cease being alive and free.

We must ship them home and prevent more from entering. We must either break Allah's yoke of slavery and cause them to become apostates or usher them into Hell. Otherwise they will torment us until they prevail, then they will enslave us.

This is not a legal issue. This is not a moral issue. This is an existential issue: will the flag yet wave, will this continue to be the land of the free and home of the brave or the prison of the craven slave?

Terrorists may try to bring death to our cities, but it is our choice to either uphold the rule of law or chip away at it. They may strike our communities, but it is our choice to either respond wisely and effectively or lash out in ways that inflame entire regions and stoke the fires of the violent extremism. That is our choice. And with the strategy we are releasing tomorrow, President Obama and the administration offers our answer.

When Nazis landed by submarine, FDR knew what to do with them. Muslims are arriving by commercial aviation, and Obama can't figure out what to do with them. The fires of violent Islam are stoked by the Qur'an, hadith and kutbah delivered at Juma Salat in every Mosque. When stung by hornets, you destroy the nest and its occupants with chemical warfare. The same logic applies in this case. When defense is considered provocative, it must be preemptive. There is no rational alternative. Overwhelming, disproportionate force is required.

Those arrogant traitors who mislead and misrule this nation talk of "inflaming" and "recruiting". If they were honest, they would tell us about the obligation of Jihad. When Muslims attack kuffar, the obligation is fard al-kifaya: binding on all eligible male Muslims until a sufficient number answer the call. When we retaliate, the obligation becomes fard ayn, binding on the entire Muslim community for immediate response.

American Thinker has an excellent article about Brennan's speech, here is their conclusion.

Seeing the enemy as potential welfare customers will not win any battles and will probably get a lot of innocent people killed.

Sphere: Related Content

Obamination: Imagining Moderation in the Party of Allah

Rush Limbaugh alerted me to the existence of a Reuters article about how John Brennan would like to boost "moderates" over "hard-liners" among Hezbollah. Since Brennan is a university graduate, I must attribute his attitude to treachery rather than stupidity or ignorance.

Did F.D.R. seek out Moderate Nazis or Kamikazes to counteract their more aggressive brethren? Brennan says that Hezbollah has evolved from pure terrorism to militancy and membership in the Lebanese parliament & cabinet. He appears to think that Reuters readers are not intelligent enough to understand that terrorism & militancy are the same thing and not entirely inconsistent with seeking power through the parliament. Granted, some purists may reject the latter method, but most are willing to operate on parallel tracks. We need to recognize that those tracks run to total conquest; to the concentration of temporal and spiritual power in Muslim hands.

Shi'ia or Sunni, they're all Muslims. They all read from the same Qur'an, which issues a demonic mandate to conquer and dominate the entire world through intimidation and aggression. The main difference is who should rule, a direct descendant of Moe or a popularly chosen caliph from the ummah. So they differ over muta, al-taqiyya & making shrines of graves. Big deal. They all want us dead or enslaved. They all want Israel eradicated. So what if some of them have issues of pragmatism, tactics and scheduling?

So long as Muslims believe that Allah said "fight them" and meant it, as recorded in the Qur'an, a significant number of them will attempt to obey that command, with resulting death and destruction. Anyone who thinks that "moderate", or less aggressive Muslims have the ability and will to stop their more zealous brethren from acting on Allah's word needs psychiatric help.

Asserting that "moderate elements" exist within Moe's War Cult can only be attributed to treachery. Islam is a war cult; war is what Muslims do. They have been waging war for nearly 1400 years, what would make anyone believe that they are about to stop? They are promised victory and great rewards in this life and the next if they wage war. They are threatened with disgrace in this life and damnation in the next if they abstain from waging war. But the likes of Brennan & Obama won't get a clue. They don't want one; they want Islam to triumph over Western Civilization.

If you think that Islam is a "great religion of peace", "hijacked", "twisted"," perverted" or "distorted" by a "tiny minority of militants:, then you are sadly ignorant of the doctrines of orthodox Islam; you have not read and comprehended my blog posts on that subject. I have some clues for you.

• Islamic Terror.chm [30.4KB] A 6 part series from Freedom Ain't Free. New 10/07/08
• Jihad.chm [45KB] A 6 part series from Freedom Ain't Free. New 10/07/08
• What's Wrong With Islam/Muslims.chm [23KB]. New 10/11/08. A single blog post that informs Kuffar and sticks the facts in Islam's eye in the most effective manner. Placed in the public domain for non-commercial use; repost at will.
• Islamic Supremacism [49KB] A 3 part series from Freedom Ain't Free. New 01/02/09. Your only source for information about the origins of Islamic Supremacism. {Allah's damned book.}
• FOMIJihad.chm [163.4KB] The Offensive Jihad thread from the old FOMI anti Islam forum. This thread contains several significant quotes from Fiqh, both ancient and modern. It also has some interesting links to follow. New 01/06/09.
• Know Thine Enemy.chm (188KB) the series of blog posts compiled into an ebook for easy reference.

Sphere: Related Content

John Brennan:Treachery @ NYU

Thanks and a tip of the hat to Logan's Warning for this red flag. John Brennan, Assistant to the President For Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, spoke at NYU.



It is clear from the video that John Brennan was pandering to Islam in his address to the law school students. The Obamination concentration on identity politics comes through loud and clear in this speech. In the end, Brennan asserts that there is no conflict or exclusivity between Muslim and American identity.

I have selected a few critical lies from the spew for refutation.

• the tolerance and diversity that defines Islam

Islam is intolerance. The Qur'an reflects Allah's attitude in this matter.

3:19. Truly, the religion with Allâh is Islâm. Those who were given the Scripture (Jews and Christians) did not differ except, out of mutual jealousy, after knowledge had come to them. And whoever disbelieves in the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh, then surely, Allâh is Swift in calling to account.

3:85 And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.

If you don't believe in Islam, Allah will punish you and selection of a religion other than Islam won't be tolerated in this world or the next. Allah does not cater to diversity, he demands that you be Muslim. going so far as to declare war against you if you don't submit to him. Refer to 8:39 & 9:29 .

• American Muslims ... have always denounced violent extremism

"Violent extremism" is frequently mentioned in this speech, implying that orthodox Islam is passive and benign. The implication is both false and malicious. Allah and Moe set the standard for Islam. Allah said that he would cast terror in 3:151. He commanded Muslims to terrorize their victims in 8:12. In 8:60, he ordered Muslims to build a great army to strike terror into the hearts of their victims. In 33:26-27 he detailed the results of casting terror. In Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220 Moe bragged about being made victorious by terror.

• frequent misrepresentations of your faith

Islam is misrepresented as a "religion of peace" even though its scripture, tradition, exegeses & jurisprudence are full of war as it its history. Brennan implies that associating Islam with aggression & terrorism misrepresents it while the real misrepresentation is performed by its apologists who claim that it is passive and benign.

• my respect for a faith that has helped to shape my own world view

How can anyone respect an evil institution responsible for the early deaths of an estimated 270*10⁶ people , an institution founded by a murderer, pedophile, warlord and rapist?

• goodness and beauty of Islam

What is good and beautiful about a war cult that sanctifies and mandates genocidal conquest using terrorism as a battle tactic? What is good and beautiful about a war cult that engages in ghazwat, enslaves women and children captivated therein and considers wives to be tilth, literally fields to be plowed and seeded?

• 270A faith of peace and tolerance

Allah is so peaceful and tolerant that he cursed Jews & Christians and commanded Muslims to wage war against them. Did you know that Muslims can not open the gates of Paradise until they hunt down and kill the last Jew?

• these faiths can and will live in peace

Brennan spoke of Jerusalem, declaring it to be his favorite city. He asserted that Islam, Judiasim and Christianity can coexist in peace. Has he read the Qur'an?

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

How can they coexist in peace when Muslims are commanded by their demon to wage war against Jews & Christians? I suggest that doubters and dissenters open Reliance of the Traveller to Book O, Chapter 9 and read it carefully. If Muslims are capable of waging war against kuffar and fail to do so they are in sin, in jeopardy of eternal damnation. Read O9.1 very carefully if you doubt this.

• violent extremism is neither unique nor inherent to any one faith; indeed, violence is something that every faith rejects but that every faith has had to confront.

What is extreme about obeying the commandments of your deity and emulating the founder of your cult? Muslims engaging in terrorism do so in obedience to Allah and in emulation of Moe. The KKK acted in contravention of Christ's teaching and example. Islam does not reject violence, it sanctifies and mandates it.

• As Muslims, you have seen a small fringe of fanatics who cloak themselves in religion try to distort your faith, though they clearly are ignorant of the most fundamental teachings of Islam.

Anyone who does not comprehend the enormous falsity of that statement can get a clue by reading Surah al-Anfal, Surah at-Taubah and Surah al-Fath of the Qur'an and Sahih Bukhari 's Books of Jihad, Khumus and Expedition. I have provide links that will give you access to those documents, the rest is up to you.

• there is nothing, absolutely nothing, holy or pure or legitimate or Islamic about murdering innocent men, women and children.

If you do not submit to Allah, you are in rebellion against him, waging war and therefore subject to the hudud listed in Surah al-Ma'idah 33. Those hudud include exile, crucifixion, decapitation and amputation of one hand and one foot. As a kuffar, you are not innocent. The Islamic proscription of killing women and children is economic, not moral, Dead women and children have no value on the slave market.

• And so devout Muslims like you, as well as members of other faiths have frequently been forced to defend and define your faith.

Islam is defined by Allah's word and Moe's example. Moe showed Muslims the true meaning of Allah's word by what he did in obedience to it: one major battle every six weeks on average for the last nine years of his life.

• al Qaeda and its hateful ideology

Allah gave Muslims a mission: total world conquest and domination. He promised them victory, conditioned on faith and righteous conduct. When Muslims are victorious, they have Allah to thank for it. When they are defeated, their own doubt and sins are to blame for their failure. Al Qaeda is not a deviation from Islam, it is a return to the foundation of Islam: Jihad.

• President Obama declared in his address at Cairo that he considers it part of his responsibility as President to to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam.

By "negative stereotypes" he means any and all truthful descriptions of orthodox Islamic doctrine and practice, particularly Fitna and the Motoons.

• So it is very clear: ignorance is a threat to our national security, prejudice is a threat to our national security discrimination is a threat to our national security and those who purport to be religious are frequently the most egregious purveyors of ignorance, prejudice and discrimination and it must stop.

How can you ignore the mandate of Jihad contained in 2:216? "Jihad is ordained for you...". Ignorance of Islamic doctrine is a threat to our national security because it prevents us from recognizing the fact that our nation is occupied by an enemy fifth column. Thirteen good men and women are dead because their superior officers ignored the signs of Jihad evident in the speech and conduct of Maj. Hasan, who presented a slide show and lecture detailing the Islamic doctrines relevant to the evil act he committed Nov. 5.

• Creating an unhealthful atmosphere around many Muslim charities that made Muslims hesitant to fulfill their sacred obligation of Zakat.

The President's National Security adviser really should have a clue. Islamic law requires that Zakat be divided into eight shares, with one share going to the terrorists.

• We are at war with al Qaeda and its extremist allies and any comment to the contrary is just inaccurate

Al Qaeda is nothing more than a name, an alias for Islam. The Muslim Brotherhood is a group of zealous Muslims. Hamas and al Qaeda are spin offs from the Brotherhood. The Charter of Hamas tells us everything we need to know about those names. Islam is at war against us; we need to recognize that fact.

Sphere: Related Content