Underlining the Need to Indoctrinate Our Children to Accept Islam

A/C.3/68/L.48 Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,stigmatization, discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons, based on religion or belief continues by underlining the need to indoctrinate our children to tolerate intolerable intolerance.

Underlining also the importance of raising awareness about different cultures
and religions or beliefs and of education in the promotion of tolerance, which
involves the acceptance by the public of and its respect for religious and cultural
diversity, including with regard to religious expression, and underlining further the
fact that education, in particular at school, should contribute in a meaningful way to
promoting tolerance and the elimination of discrimination based on religion or
belief,

raising awareness

    There is no need for increased awareness of the existence of Islam after the Accursed Abomination of 09/11/'01. Many assert that they learned everything they needed to know about Islam on that sunny Tuesday morning. The need is for truthfulness and comprehensive detail.

acceptance of diversity

    Diversity is acceptable and accepted by most. Catholics, Jews, Methodists, Baptists, Southern Baptists and various synods of Lutherans can live and work together in our society without killing each other over doctrinal differences.  What we can not and must not be expected to accept is the existence of a war cult which asserts a divine mandate to convert, conquer, kill, enslave or subjugate & extort us.

education

    A deceptive, dishonest curriculum designed to inculcate acceptance, tolerance and respect for Islam is not education, it is indoctrination and has absolutely no place in our school system.

    The United Nations demand that we fill the heads of our children with lies so that they will tolerate and respect a system of predation which is Hellbent on enslaving them. That demand is unacceptable and must be entirely rejected. 

Tolerate Respect & Accept this: 

Racism

    Allah created the Negro Race "for the fire", they are predestined to eternal damnation, arbitrarily and capriciously.  The Islamic creation myth is clear on this matter; look it up in Mishkat Ul-Misabih if you doubt this.  Moe ordered his followers to obey the ruler, even if "an Ethiopian whose head is like a raisin" was made their ruler.

Terrorism

    Allah said: "I will cast terror", "Allah cast terror",  : "to strike terror" and  "to terrify thereby". Moe said: "I have been made victorious with terror:. Allah imputes acts of terrorism to the Muslim's credit as "deeds of righteousness".

Genocide

    Allah commanded that Moe make "great slaughter"  and kill and wound "many of them" before holding prisoners for ransom.

Intolerance

    If anyone seeks a religion other than Islam, "it will never be accepted".  Muslims are the "best of peoples" as they bring the people to Islam "with chains on their necks". According to the Hanafi madhab, disbelief (infidelity) is an evil which must be removed from the world by conversion to Islam or death.

Imperialism

    Jihad is not struggle with one's ego and temptations; nobody gets killed or kills others struggling with his ego.  Jihad is defined in Islamic law as "war against non-Muslims". Infidels may be attacked without provocation. Muslims go to Jihad or go to Hell.  The Jihad imperatives are fight... until loops whose terminal conditions are a monopoly for Allah and the subjugation and extortion of "people of the book:  Jihad is not an anachronism, it is required in every year, from 623  to  the end of the world.

Antisemitism

    "We shall knock on heaven's doors with the skulls of Jews".Allah will continually send someone to torment and humiliate the Jews. The gates of Paradise will not swing open for Muslims until they murder the last Jew. Jesus Christ will lead the Muslims in the final genocide of Jews. 

Sphere: Related Content

Islamophobia in the Light of Hypocrisy

A Huffington Post article by Michael Shank triggered one of my Google Alerts. I have selected two excerpts for dissection.

The first excerpt follows a litany of "scares", ending with Islamophobia.

 There is purpose here. When entire races, religions or regions are dehumanized, it is easier to wage war, expel immigrants, and forge new, discriminatory (or oppressive) domestic and foreign policies to deal with these vilified populations.

Which of those things did we do?  Did we wage war against Communism? Did we outlaw the Communist Party?  Did we arbitrarily expel Communists?  How about Catholics & Jews?   We did go to war against Japan, seems like there was some valid reason for that action. I do not remember Pearl Harbor, but some of my readers might.  The issue of internment is highly charged, but I have seen indications that the policy had some grounding in reality.

    Next, we get down to the issue: Islamic violence.

We have few notions of Islam and nonviolence, in large part because our fear has focused on the extreme outliers and because our largely Christian nation has not yet fully embraced -- in media, policy, education or law -- religious diversity, no matter how nonviolent, peaceful and tolerant the religion's majority. It is time we do so. There is much to embrace -- if only we open our eyes to it.

dehumanized

    Islam depicts Jews as those who "earned Allah's anger"; Christians as those who "went astray". It describes Jews as the "worst of living creatures"; "apes and swine".  It curses us  and declares war on us.

notions of Islam and nonviolence

Are notions of nonviolent Islam grounded in reality?   Here is a list of the Islamic episodes of violence  in the table of contents of Guillaume's The Life of Muhammad. 

The first raid: on Waddan 281
Hamza's raid to the coast 283
Raid on Buwat 285
Raid on al-'Ushayra 285
Raid on al-Kharrar 286
Raid on Safawan 286
Fighting in the sacred month 286
The change of the Qibla 289
Battle of Badr
Raid on B. Sulaym 360
Raid called al-Sawiq 361
Raid on Dhu Amarr 362
Raid on al-Furu' 362
Attack on B. Qaynuqa' 363
Raid on al-Qarada 364
Killing of Ka'b b. al-Ashraf 364
Muhayyisa and Huwayyisa 369
Battle of Uhud 370
The Quran on UQud 391
The day of al-Raji' 426
Treachery at Bi'r Ma'una 433
B. al-Nadir exiled 437
Raid of Dhatu'l-Riqa' 445
Last expedition to Badr
Raid on Dumatu'l-Jandal 449
Battle of the Ditch 456
Attack on B. Qurayza 461
Killing of Sallam 482
Attack on B. Lihyan 485
Attack on Dhu Qarad 486
Attack on B. al-Mustaliq
Raid on Mu'ta 531
The occupation of Mecca 540
Khalid followed by 'Ali go forth as missionaries 561
Khalid destroys al-'Uzza 565
Battle of Hunayn 566
Capture of al-Ta'if 587
Division of the spoils of Hawazin
Raid on TabUk
Ghalib's raid on B. al-Mulawwah 660
Zayd's raid on Judham 662
Zayd's raid on B. Fazara 664
'Abdullah b. Rawaha's raid to kill al- Yusayr 665
'Abdullah b. Unays's raid to kill Khalid b. Sufyan 666
'Uyayna's raid on B. al-' Anbar 667
Ghalib's raid on B. Murra 667
'Amr b. al-' As's raid on Dhatu'l-Salasil 668
Ibn Abu Hadrad's raid on Idam 669
His raid on al-Ghaba 671
'Abdu'l-Rabznan's raid on Dumatu'l-Jandal 672
Abu 'Ubayda's raid to the coast 673
Salim b. 'Umayr's raid to kill Abu' Afak
'Umayr b. 'Adiy's raid to kill' Asma' 675
Capture of Thumama b. Athal 676
'Alqama's raid 677
Kurz's raid on the Bajilis 677
'Ali's raid on the Yaman 678

extreme outliers

    Was the founder of Islam an extreme outlier?   He said that he was "ordered to fight the people". He said that he was "made victorious with terror".  No, Muhammad defined Islam, and set its standard with the exemplary conduct listed in the contents of his biography.

    Is Allah, Islam's deity, an extreme outlier?  He ordained jihad for Muslims. He commanded Muslims to wage war against pagans until resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped on a global scale.  Allah commanded Muslims to wage war against Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians until they are subjugated and extorted. 

    Are Al-Qaeda, HAMAS & Hezbollah extreme outliers or are they Salafists, obedient to Allah and emulating Muhammad? 

religious diversity

    Muhammad said "I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslim.".

nonviolent, peaceful

    Are they believers? Or are they hypocrites? If they are believers, they are neither nonviolent nor peaceful. 

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh's Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur'ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .

If they are nonviolent and peaceful, then: [See 9:84...89 for the definition of hypocrites.]

4:88. Then what is the matter with you that you are divided into two parties about the hypocrites? Allâh has cast them back (to disbelief) because of what they have earned. Do you want to guide him whom Allâh has made to go astray? And he whom Allâh has made to go astray, you will never find for him any way (of guidance).

4:89. They wish that you reject Faith, as they have rejected (Faith), and thus that you all become equal (like one another). So take not Auliyâ' (protectors or friends) from them, till they emigrate in the Way of Allâh (to Muhammad ). But if they turn back (from Islâm), take (hold) of them and kill them wherever you find them, and take neither Auliyâ' (protectors or friends) nor helpers from them.

9:68. Allâh has promised the hypocrites; men and women, and the disbelievers, the Fire of Hell, therein shall they abide. It will suffice them. Allâh has cursed them and for them is the lasting torment.

tolerant

    Why are there no churches in Saudi Arabia?  Why are Christians murdered, their churches & homes destroyed with impunity in Egypt, Indonesia, Kenya & Nigeria?

much to embrace

    Does that include genocidal conquest & terrorism?  Do you embrace child brides, who can be divorced before they reach menarche?  Do you embrace a legal code in which a woman's testimony is worth half that of her husband?  Do you embrace the return of Jesus Christ as a genocidal warlord?

Sphere: Related Content

I'd rather be in my hell than your "heaven."

A young second-generation Egyptian-American recently demanded that a blogger-friend of mine apologize to him, and to his father, because of something she’d written on her blog. She had re-published (from public records) a partial list of just the “Letter A” section of the donors to the Obama campaign with Muslim names and his father was on the list, along with a very large number of others disproportional to the Muslim-American demographics. He said he and his father were proud Obama supporters, so he was proud to be included on the list, but went on to explain that he was outraged and offended by what he assumed were her reasons for publishing such a list.

During the course of my online conversation with him as he simultaneously espoused the virtues and superiority of the religion of peace and demanded apologies from my friend and me for our apparent lack of sensitivity, I realized something. On one hand, this young Egyptian-American enjoyed the clout that being indirectly associated with such a powerful group as Islamic jihad gave him, but on the other hand, he wore that clout like a chip on his shoulder, daring anyone to knock it off. I also realized I’d seen this type of doublespeak before.

Many years ago, I had an Italian sister-in-law. She was one of my favorite in-laws, actually, as we had a lot in common, and normally got along very well, but I recalled a very strange and awkward conversation we’d had in the beginning of our relationship, in which this woman had misinterpreted something I’d said (I never did quite figure out what it was I’d said), but she apparently thought I had insinuated that she was “connected” to the Italian mafia, and had become very offended.

Well, at the time, we were living in upstate New York, no where near any large cities. I had lived in Las Vegas during the 1970’s, when the Italian mafia was very active there, so I was familiar with who they were, but this was the late ‘90’s, and I hadn’t really thought about them in years. I discretely inquired of my other in-laws as to why my sister-in-law was so sensitive about this…Was the mob active in our area? Did she have relatives that were active in the mafia? They just rolled their eyes, and explained no, they didn’t think so, and that they didn’t know why she acted like that from time to time. After I’d met more of her family and friends, I began to realize that a few of them, like the Egyptian-American I met recently, liked the social “power” that it gave them to make people think that they just might be “connected,” yet it gave them a different kind of social power to, at the same time, feign offense, and effectively play the “race card,” when anyone brought the subject up (even by accident).

We are seeing this same doublespeak phenomenon, right now, in the political arena, as the Obama-Biden campaign is enjoying the benefits of touting the socialist ideals of social justice and wealth redistribution to garner votes from the poorer members of our society, and financial support from international leftists. Yet, they are also enjoying the social power that being able to call anyone a “racist,” who dares to use the “S” word gives them in the media.

Regardless of who wins this election, and becomes our President in January (or whenever they get through with all the re-counts), we are going to be fighting a war of words. To win this war, we are going to need to be able to accurately identify and describe the various “ministries of truth” that have made great advancements online, in our government, in international government, and in commerce.

Corporate employees have been fighting this war of words for a long time in the United States. The word “diversity,” used to pertain to financial assets and to agriculture, but now it’s applied to human beings, and has come to mean giving preferential treatment to designated minority groups. Our Founding Fathers struggled with the idea of “religious tolerance,” but generally applied it when refraining from killing someone regardless of how warped you thought his ideas were. Now, religious tolerance has come to mean that you will “embrace” the diversity doctrine and the values of every minority group, or you will be unemployed and ostracized.

Christians have also been fighting this war of words for a long time. Our adversaries have tried to use misinterpretations of our scriptures to try to control us. For example, they’ll mockingly ask “Isn’t it a sin to ‘judge’ people?” as they try to play on our fear of hell – and of disappointing our Creator – for the advancement of their own Marxist, political-correctness agendas.

In this war of words, and in this world of doublespeak, those of us who love individual freedom are going to have to summon the courage to resist. We have reached the time that the apostle Paul talked about when he wrote to the Church at Ephesus, “Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.” It won’t be easy, and there is no doubt that some of us will face persecution.

At times, it will seem like it would be easier to just give in, and go with the flow. But folks, I’ve taken a look at what the enemies of liberty have to offer. The so-called “heaven” promised to the jihadis does not entice me. The soulless, lifeless void of communism has nothing to offer me. I have news for them. Yes, I’m a Christian, and yes, I love God, and I’m planning to spend eternity with Him, but frankly I’d be better off in my hell than in the so-called “heaven” that any of them are offering.

Those of us who have known and loved freedom know what we’re fighting for, and we know it’s worth it. Freedom is worth it. America is worth it. And we can win – Together, and with God on our side, we can win.

I believe, as King David said in the Psalms, that God will confound and put to shame those that seek to kill the soul of America, and He will cause them to be tangled in the very traps that they laid for the destruction of our nation. Our Founders, who were preparing for a battle that was different in nature, but just as serious wrote, “…With a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.”

So, as Todd Beamer, before he sacrificed his life in helping stop terrorists from most likely destroying our nation’s capitol, said, “Are you guys ready? Let’s roll!”


(The above speech was given during the first 20 minutes of the second half of the Rally for the Conservative Cause on Blog Talk Radio - The link is below). For the first half of the Rally, click here.

 

Sphere: Related Content

Bailout of Fannie/Freddie - a Move Toward Socialized Housing?

In April, in Finding a Roommate Online: It’s illegal to ask sexual orientation, race, or religion to choose a roommate, I wrote about the Fair Housing Act being applied to an online roommate-finding service.

As Wired.com explained in April:

Apartment hunting site Roommates.com cannot shield itself from an housing discrimination lawsuit by claiming it is just an internet forum, because the site requires users to answer questions about their gender, marital status and sexual orientation, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Thursday.

The ruling is an important one because it sets a limit on a federal law protecting internet forums from lawsuits. Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act largely frees websites, online forums and ISPs from responsibility for what users say on their sites. Online freedom advocates describe that law as the best thing Congress has ever done for freedom of expression on the internet, since it allows social networking sites, hosted blogging services and news sites with commenting features — like this one — to let users be responsible for their words.

That legal immunity doesn’t apply to Roommates.com, the court ruled, because the check boxes on the site actively solicit discriminatory content, making the service much more than a simple forum….(more)

And I wrote in response:

The larger story here is that the advocates for the political-correctness agenda onine have just won a major victory while advocates for personal liberty and freedom of speech online have sustained a loss. Watch for more lawsuits like this, in which things like “discrimination” and “hate speech” become not only frowned upon by the online community, but actually illegal.

With this in mind, I cannot help but shudder a bit when I hear that the federal government has just seized two more major mortgage companies. I have to ask myself how long it will be before affirmative action and gay-rights activists will be suing the federal government for special considerations in neighborhood planning in lending practices? How long before banks and Realtors will be given special tax breaks and preference on corporate contracts according to their commitment to promoting the diversity doctrine?

It won't be long.

Sphere: Related Content

FBI Sensitivity Training

Brought To You By: American Congress For Truth

The WorldNetDaily story below illustrates why we regularly point out how “political correctness” is aiding and abetting the advance of militant Islam in America.

One line is especially revealing:

“The [FBI] officials said terrorism is "not a new phenomenon" limited to Muslims, and they cited abortion-clinic bomber Eric Rudolph as an example of a Christian terrorist.”

The problem with this reasoning is that very few terrorist acts worldwide are perpetrated by Christians, whereas since 9/11 over 9,000 verifiable acts of terrorism have been perpetrated worldwide by Muslims.

Furthermore, nowhere in the New Testament are Christians exhorted to “smite infidels” or forcibly subjugate unbelievers, as is the case in the Qur’an and the Hadith.

To gloss over or rationalize Islamic terrorism by pointing to a handful of “Christian terrorists” is a revealing example of political correctness run amok in the FBI, a political correctness that some field agents tell us they vehemently disagree with.

You will be stunned by what you read in this story.


HOMELAND INSECURITY

FBI boosts training in Islamic 'sensitivity'

Weeks added to required 'enrichment' program: 'We all need to learn and understand each other'.

The FBI believes its agents still aren't sensitive enough to Muslims and their culture, so the bureau has extended by "a few weeks" its Islamic cultural "enrichment" training program, WND has learned.

During a recent outreach event at a Washington-area mosque, FBI officials also reassured a large turnout of concerned Muslims that the bureau is not profiling Arabs and Muslims for terrorism, and has made investigating alleged "hate crimes" against them and other minorities "the second-highest priority in the criminal division of the FBI." [emphasis added].

Among the officials who attended the Feb. 8 "town hall meeting" at the large ADAMS Center mosque were Timothy Healy, deputy assistant director for FBI intelligence, and Dave Bennett, assistant special agent in charge of the FBI's Washington field office.

Read the full report here.


Islam is deception, it is neither a relgion nor a religion of peace.

"Islam is the only "religion" in the world that has developed doctrine
theology and a legal system that mandates warfare against unbelievers."
Robert Spencer, Jihad Watch.org

"Only Muslims defend their beliefs by burning down churches, killing
people, and destroying embassies. The Muslims must ask themselves what
they can do for human-kind before they demand human-kind respect them."
Dr. Wafa Sultan

Note: The differences between the Bible and the Qu’ran are many. The one that sticks out for those who really know is this; The Bible is “descriptive” while the Qu’ran is “prescriptive”.

Do you understand the distinction?

Sphere: Related Content