Impeach Nancy Pelosi!

Nancy Pelosi has done more harm in 4 months than anyone could ever imagine.

She and her ilk are continually screeching for the impeachment of President Bush and Vice President Cheney. Why? Because these two men have the audacity to stand firm in the face of ridiculous criticism from burned out hippies and because they refuse to allow non-combatants to micro-manage a war. In other words, this harpie can't stand the thought of mere men standing up to her. Nor can other "enlightened" women, such as Hillary.

Further, these man haters can't stand the thought there is a REAL woman who wields a big stick and speaks softly, one with true power, as well as maintains her complete femininity all the while showing herself to be the true lady she is--educated, eloquent, trustworthy, and, yes, attractive. THAT woman is Dr. Condoleeza Rice. They would love to impeach her, as well, I'm sure.

However, when it comes to TRUE high crimes and misdemeanors, we need only look to Pelosi.

First, there is a video in my video section here regarding Democrats and their views on Saddam Hussein, WMD and the war. Pelosi WISHES this video would disappear, but in this age of the internet, that's not going to happen.

Then we hear all about how she "supports the troops but not the war". If the bills she's trying to pass, laden with pork and withdrawal dates (thus emboldening the enemy and further endangering our troops) is any indication of her "troop support", we can do without her support, thank you very much.

How about her choice for her lapdog, John Murtha? He of ABSCAM fame and a disgrace to his marine uniform? A criminal? Not that Steny Hoyer is any better, but MURTHA??? C'mon!

And the stink about Air Force 3. Along with her demands that AF3 be made available not only to her but her entire family. At taxpayer expense.

The non-binding resolution? That whole mess was also a complete waste of taxpayer time AND money, simply to get across an opinion.

Now, Syria. Was she authorized to go to Syria? NO. And, one of her tagalongs was Keith Ellison, a muslim congressman whose loyalties remain to be seen. After all, the Koran demands total obeisance above all else. His presence in her entourage is highly suspect.

She was told not to go. She is fully cognizant of the current state Syria is held in, that state being a terrorist state and sponsor of terrorism. She knows Iran and Syria are in collusion with Iraq and in the continued murder of Iraqui civilians and our troops. Yet, she thumbed her nose at the President and tried to do Dr. Rice's job. That is not part of her job and steps way over the boundaries of decorum for the SoH.

And the ultimate pratfall of the trip? Giving Syria a "message" from Israel, one Israel never gave to her. Oh, and of course, wearing a hijab as a fashion statement.

Pelosi is the one who should be impeached. For sedition, treason, aid and comfort to the enemy, fiduciary misconduct (wasting taxpayer money), flat out lying as to her intentions in getting elected, collusion and finally, violation of the Logan Act. She has no business trying to play with the "big boys". She's still in kindergarten when it comes to politics. However, she has let her blind hatred of the administration guide her actions, simply because the administration won't cave to her foot-stomping temper tantrums and LISTEN to her.

Over at Victory Caucus, there are several links to excellent articles about her behaviour. I'll list them here and let you be the judge.

Links:

"Terrorists Agree: Nancy's Da Bomb": http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=25032_Terrorists_Agree-_Nancys_Da_Bomb&only

"Pratfall in Damascus--Nancy Pelosi's Foolish Shuttle Diplomacy"; http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/04/AR2007040402306_pf.html


"Speaker Pelosi's Adventure in Damascus Has Cost Her a lot of Political Capital": http://www.mcall.com/news/opinion/all-editorial1apr08,0,117465.story?coll=all-opiniontop-hed

"Nancy Pelosi Should Resign"; http://newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/4/6/151249.shtml?s=lh (This one is written by a Democrat, no less!)

"Pelosi Defends Visit to Mideast"; http://washingtontimes.com/national/20070406-115248-8516r.htm

"Pelosi Mideast Trip Strengthened Ties"; http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8OB9KC80&show_article=1

These are the links in just TWO threads at TVC!

Bottom line is, Pelosi's gotta go. 'Nuf said!

Sphere: Related Content

HE IS RISEN! God Bless Johnny Hart and his FEARLESSNESS in Proclaiming his Faith!

Today's offering from Johnny Hart is as thought-provoking as all his Easter offerings. It's a welcome breath of fresh air for he is fearless in proclaiming his love of Jesus and what Jesus has done for the world. The fact he boldly prints it in a cartoon format allows both adults to ponder and think and children to learn about the Saviour. Too bad the true meanings he portrays fly over the heads of the MSM and the liberals--they could definitely learn something. Maybe that's what they're afraid of.

Enjoy and rejoice for JESUS is RISEN!

Sphere: Related Content

Fellow Bloggers and "Right" Thinkers

Since the inception of The Victory Caucus (www.VictoryCaucus.com or hit the direct link button on the left side bar), and my appointment as moderator, I've been blessed to be associated with many fine bloggers. Many of our members are retired Veteran's, parents of troops currently serving, members of the Gathering of Eagles--in short, people you want on your side in a dark alley or backing you up against the barking mad moonbats.

You will also notice a Victory Coalition Blogroll, along with my links, also on the left sidebar. I highly recommend taking some time to visit each of the Coalition bloggers (more added periodically) as well as many of the links.

One of my favorite blogs is this one: "Capitalism or Socialism...You Decide" and the direct link is here: http://takeourcountryback.townhall.com/. This is hosted by my friend Snooper, a Veteran and an Eagle. I also call him friend.

Below is a sampling of what you can find on Snooper's blog:

"The Pathology of the Leftinistra:

This is an excellent piece of analyzing the Leftinistra as to what drives them and what to do about it.

Please visit this site to read, learn, heed and combat Moonbatisms.

Teasers:

From the inception of psychology over 100 years ago, conditions such as autism, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, narcissism and Tourette’s syndrome were thought to be psychological in origin – and that with enough therapy, enough blaming inadequate parenting, enough talk, enough delving into “feelings,” the sufferer could be treated successfully or even cured.

Liberal pathology

I suspect that at the core of liberal “thinking” is the same kind of pathology that characterizes other mental disorders, i.e., a glitch in the brain that produces “feelings” and behavior over which liberals have no control.

Liberals are like children

Liberals, like children, live in a world of utopian dreaminess, clinging to a narrow, circumscribed reality and believing that if everyone would just be nice to each other – let’s talk, let’s chat – all the noisy death threats and pesky suicide bombings would go away, and all those grumpy grownups in the current administration would see the light.

A rage that knows no bounds

Children take things personally. “My father is bigger (stronger, smarter) than your father” is just about intolerable to the average child. “Is not!” “Is too!” is an exchange that inevitably results in either tears or fists. In 2000, when George W. Bush ascended to the presidency, the initial despair of liberals quickly morphed into childlike, irrational anger, which has obsessed them for the past six years.

Fathoming liberal rage

To understand the left’s treasonous rage, it is important to understand that the most cherished value in the life of children (read liberals) is to be “liked” by their peers, a theory that Judith Rich Harris has exhaustively documented in her best-selling and revolutionary book, The Nurture Assumption..." Read the full story at the link above.

Another recent article from Snooper:

"Censure the Leftinistra:

Put Up Or Shut Up!!

Where are ALL the men in DC? Out washing dishes or what? Are you men or mice? Squeak up!!!Expulsion, Censure, Reprimand, and Fine: Legislative
Discipline in the House of Representatives Summary

The House of Representatives is expressly authorized within the United States Constitution (Article I, Section 5, clause 2) to discipline or “punish” its own Members. This authority of the institution of the House to discipline a Member for “disorderly Behaviour” is in addition to any criminal or civil liability that a Member of the House may incur for particular misconduct, and is a device or procedure designed not so much as merely a punishment of the individual Member, but rather ultimately as a measure to protect the institutional integrity of the House of Representatives, its proceedings and its reputation..." Complete story at above referenced link.

And yet a third:

"Impeach Pelosi:

I wonder if there are any men left in DC, especially in our Congress and any of the other branches of Government.

Clearly and, once again, a Leftinistra has overstepped their bounds and not one coward will stand up to IT.

WHY IS THAT?Are there no men left in Washington? Or are they all cowards? (Where have we heard those questions before?)

The Logan Act

Conducting Foreign Relations Without Authority: The Logan Act Summary

The Logan Act, codified at 18 U.S.C. § 953, states:

Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply, himself or his agent, to any foreign government or the agents thereof for redress of any injury which he may have sustained from such government or any of its agents or subjects..." Again, read complete story at above referenced link.

The bottom line is this, people. We are incessantly battered and inundated with a very vocal minority bent on turning this nation into a failed utopian mess ala Stalin, Marx and Lenin.

We are faced with this minority shoving their lack of moral values upon us, forcing us into the goose-stepping political correctness, cultural diversity mess we see.

We are faced with a bunch of children who haven't grown up, yet are controlling our Congress.

Do you remember the Johnson years? The Carter years? The Clinton years?

Do you really want your children to learn revisionist history, excluding the Holocaust for fear of offending islamofascists bent on killing us and completely annihilating this country--as they have repeatedly stated?

Do you want your children learning that homosexuality is an acceptable lifestyle, AIDS doesn't discriminate, tax increases are the only way to a healthy economy, illegal aliens should not have to follow the law of the land, God doesn't exist, etc., etc., etc., all in the name of liberal defeatism shouted from the rooftops from the vocal minority?

If the answer is a vehement and unequivocal NO!, then get off your asses and get in the game.

Start educating yourself on the real issues, what's really going on and how you can change it. Get over to the TVC, participate in the forums, read the blogs of those who have been there, done that, have the tshirt.

Quit being the mealy-mouthed, "oh I'm so afraid I'll offend someone" MOUSE you're being by giving in to these barkers, grow a spine and stand up for yourself, your family, your beliefs, your values, your rights and your country, THE GREATEST NATION IN THIS OR ANY OTHER TIME ON THIS EARTH.

Everybody in this country is called to serve in one way or another. If you can't actively serve in the Armed Forces then support those who can and do. Adopt a soldier; hell, adopt a whole unit!

Believe it or not, the most important story of the day is NOT Anna Nicole or Brittany,or anything out of Hollyweird, nor is it the Goracle and his mad ravings. It's here, NOW, and protecting our freedoms as our Founding Fathers laid out.

You either enjoy your freedom or you don't. That's the TRUE choice you have to make. God help you if you make the wrong choice.

Sphere: Related Content

Primer of Necessary Definitions--of me and of Law

Unless otherwise stated, all definitions are from Black's Law Dictionary, Eighth Edition, edited by Bryan A. Garner.

That opening line should tell you something about me.

Most people own a Webster's Dictionary. I own a well-used, often-referred-to Black's Law Dictionary. No, I'm not an attorney.

I am, however, a paralegal with a certification equal to a Master's Degree, will be starting on my certification equal to a Ph.D in two weeks (by the way, our certification classes last 5 months, in which we cram six years of study--definitely not for the faint-hearted; further, only 10% pass their certifications on the first try--I am part of that 10%).

I am also the niece of a retired Federal Judge and a cousin to a Brig. General (Army, Ret.).

I have hung up on judges who copped an attitude, usually after laughing at them. I have stood toe to toe with armed officers and told them to get the hell out of my way and change their attitude or they will not receive the information they need. I have looked down the barrel of a .38 loaded with wadcutters, lived to tell about it and prosecuted that criminal to a term of four consecutive life terms. I also drove a cab in Vegas for close to four years, had gang members as regular passengers--gang members who operated by MY rules in MY cab--and earned their respect and free passage through their territory.

I have suffered radiation poisoning while working for my father--after he ticked off the government. That radiation poisoning took years from my life, but I'm here. My father is not.

Threats don't work with me; nor do orders. If you want something from me, you ASK me--NICELY.

In short, I don't tolerate fools, imbeciles, idiots, boneheads, milquetoasts, lunatics, moonbats, or blathering, slavering, rabid dogs (leftists).

I don't tolerate those that cannot make a point, argue in a circular fashion with no sense of logic, or blindly repeat propaganda they've been brainwashed with. They are beneath me in the food chain and in life. Nor will I rise to any bait they may throw in my path.

They aren't worth my time, my energy or my superior intellect.

People who suffer from delusions, whether it be of purple skys with cotton candy pink clouds, utopian societies based on Marx, Stalin or Lenin, delusions that terrorists are our friends and we can talk to them and negotiate peacefully or delusions they are God, ruler of all, need to be locked up for their own safety and that of society.

Their particular brand of poison is akin to a festering pustule on the ass of society, just waiting to burst and spread their infection in all directions. Such is the current state of the RNC/GOP Blog.

Which brings me to these interesting definitions derived from Black's (17 words, not such big words, after all). All--ALL--well versed, true blue, Patriotic Americans should KNOW these terms, backward and forward. For the sake of brevity, these definitions have been confined to the main definition. For those that don't and want to have them on hand, feel free to cut and paste.

1). Accessory: n. 1. Something of secondary or subordinate importance. 2. Criminal Law. A person who aids or contributes in the commission or concealment of a crime. An accessory is usually liable only if the crime is a felony. Cf. PRINCIPAL (2). [Cases: Criminal Law key 68-77; Homicide key 573. C.J.S. Criminal Law sections 137-142]--accessory, adj; accessoryship, n.

2). Ambassador: 1. A diplomatic officer of the highest rank, usually designated by a government as its resident representative in a foreign state. Ambassadors represent the sovereign as well as the nation and enjoy many privileges while abroad in their official capacity, including immunity. Ambassadors are distinguished from ministers and envoys, who represent only the state where they are from and not the sovereign. Ambassadors are also generally distinguished from certain legates who have only ecclesiastical authority. But the papal nuncio and some legates, such as the legate a latere, bear the rank of ambassador. See NUNCIO; LEGATE. [Cases: Ambassadors and Consuls sections 2-32.] 2. A representative appointed by another. 3. An unofficial or nonappointed representative.

3). Bribery: n. The corrupt payment, receipt or solicitation of a private favor for official action. Bribery is a felony in most jurisdictions. See Model Penal Code Section 240.1. Cf. KICKBACK. [Cases: Bribery key 1. C.J.S. Bribery sections 2-3, 5-8, 10-11.]--bribe, vb.

4). Constitution: 1. The fundamental and organic law of a nation or state that establishes the institutions and apparatus of government, defines the scope of governmental sovereign powers, and guarantees individual civil rights and civil liberties. [Cases: Constitutional Law key 1.1.] 2. The written instrument embodying this fundamental law, together with any formal amendments.

5). Diplomacy: n. Int'l law. 1. The art and practice of conducting negotiations between national governments.
Open Diplomacy: Diplomacy carried on with free access to interested observers and members of the press.

Parliamentary Diplomacy: The negotiations and discussions carried out in international organizations according to their rules of procedure.

Secret Diplomacy: Diplomacy carried on behind closed doors. Also termed quiet diplomacy.

Shuttle Diplomacy: Diplomatic negotiations assisted by emissaries, who travel back and forth between negotiating countries. In legal contexts, the term usually refers to a similar approach used by a mediator in negotiating the settlement of a lawsuit. The mediator travels back and forth between different rooms, one of which is assigned to each side's decision-makers and counsel. The mediator relays offers and demands between the rooms and, by conferring with the parties about their positions and about the uncertainty of litigation, seeks to reach an agreed resolution of the case. The mediator does not bring the parties together in the same room.

2. Loosely, foreign policy. 3. The collective functions performed by a diplomat. diplomatic, adj; diplomat, n.

6). Hudna: Arabic word often translated as "cease-fire.- Historically used as a tactic aimed at allowing the party declaring the hudna to regroup while tricking an enemy into lowering its guard. When the hudna expires, the party that declared it is stronger and the enemy weaker. The term comes from the story of the Muslim conquest of Mecca. Instead of a rapid victory, Muhammad made a ten-year treaty with the Kuraysh tribe. In 628 AD, after only two years of the ten-year treaty, Muhammad and his forces concluded that the Kuraysh were too weak to resist. The Muslims broke the treaty and took over all of Mecca without opposition. (Definition provided by The Israel Project; http://www.theisraelproject.org/site/apps/nl/content2.asp?c=hsJPK0PIJpH&b=886017&ct=1181591)

7). Injurious Falsehood: 1. DISPARAGEMENT (3). 2. TRADE DISPARAGEMENT.

8). Libel: vb. 1. To defame (someone) in a permanent medium, especially in writing. [Cases: Libel and Slander key 1, 25 C.J.S. Libel and Slander; Injurious Falsehood sections 2, 5-6, 10, 47-52.] 2. History Maritime Law. To sue in admiralty or ecclesiastical court. This use of the term was eliminated with the merging of the Admiralty Rules into the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1986.

9). Misprision of Treason: Concealment or nondisclosure of someone else's treason.

10). Positive Misprision: The active commission of a wrongful act .

11). President: n. 1. The chief political executive of a government; the head of state. [Cases: United States key 26. C.J.S. United States sections 45-47.] 2. The chief executive officer of a corporation or other organization. 3. CHAIR (1) 4. See CHAIR (3). See (in senses 3 & 4) presiding officer (3) under OFFICER (2); presidential, adj.

12). Secretary of State: 1. The member of the President's cabinet who heads the U.S. Department of State. The Secretary is the first-ranking member of the cabinet and is also a member of the National Security Council. He or she is fourth in line of succession to the presidency after the Vice President, the Speaker of the House, and the President pro tempore of the Senate. [Cases: United States key 40. C.J.S. United States sections 58-60.] 2. A state government official who is responsible for the licensing and incorporation of businesses, the administration of elections, and other formal duties. The secretary of state is elected in some states and appointed in others.

13). Sedition: n. 1. An agreement, communication, or other preliminary activity aimed at inciting treason or some lesser commotion against the public authority. 2. Advocacy aimed at inciting or producing--and likely to incite or produce--imminent lawless action. At common law, sedition included defaming a member of the royal family or the government. The difference between sedition and treason is that the former is committed by preliminary steps, while the latter entails some overt act for carrying out the plan. But of course, if the plan is merely for some small commotion, even accomplishing the plan does not amount to treason. Cf. TREASON. [Cases: Insurrection and Sedition key 1. C.J.S. Riot; Insurrection section 29.]; seditious, adj.

14). Slander: n. 1. A defamatory assertion expressed in a transitory form, especially speech. Damages for slander--unlike those for libel--are not presumed and thus must be proved by the plaintiff (unless the defamation is slander per se). [Cases: Libel and Slander key 1, 24. C.J.S. Libel and Slander; Injurious Falsehood sections 2, 5-6, 10, 47.] 2. The act of making such a statement. See DEFAMATION. Cf. LIBEL--slander, vb.; slanderous, adj.

15). Speaker of House: [Speaker] 1. One who makes a speech . 2. The presiding officer of a large deliberative assembly, especially a legislature's more numerous house, such as the House of Representatives . See CHAIR (1). [Cases: United States key 7.1. C.J.S. United States section 16.]

16). Subversion: The process of overthrowing, destroying or corrupting .

17). Treason: n. The offense of attempting to overthrow the government of the state to which one owes allegiance, either by making war against the state or by materially supporting its enemies.--Also termed high treason; alto proditio. Cf. SEDITION. [Cases: Treason key 1. C.J.S. Treason sections 2-3, 5.]--treasonable, treasonous, adj.

Jimmy Carter; Howard Dean; Bob Jefferson; John Kerry; John Murtha; Nancy Pelosi --ALL are guilty of one or more, or a combination thereof, of the above definitions.

RNC/GOP Blog--guilty as an accessory of allowing slander upon their blog without monitoring their site. Good thing we have records of it.

Sphere: Related Content

The Main Stream Media (in THIS Case, 60 Minutes) Would NEVER Do a Story on This!

American Forces Press Service SCIO, N.Y., March 26, 2007 –

The Navy honored Marine Cpl. Jason L. Dunham March 24 by naming a guided missile destroyer after the fallen Marine hero during a ceremony here.

Hundreds of students, teachers and veterans packed the gym of Scio Central High School as Navy Secretary Donald C. Winter announced that the name of the Navy's newest Arleigh Burke class guided missile destroyer would honor the memory of the Marine Corps' most recent Medal of Honor recipient.

Dunham is the Marine Corps' first Medal of Honor recipient for actions in Operation Iraqi Freedom. He earned the Medal of Honor for his actions in Iraq on April 14, 2004, when he threw himself on top of a live grenade to save the lives of his fellow Marines. He died of his injuries eight days later at the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda, Md.

Winter made the announcement in Dunham's hometown, with Dunham's parents, Dan and Deb, and siblings in attendance.

"Dan and I are very excited and proud to accept the powerful tribute the Navy has honored Jason with," said an emotional Deb Dunham to the crowd. "We wish to thank the Navy for this historical honor you have given Jay by commemorating his actions and memory with a ship's title."

"There is a long tradition in the United States Navy of naming our war ships after heroes," Winter said. "The hero would no longer be with us, but his name would live on."

Winter said that when the time came to name the newest destroyer, he had no problem coming up with a fitting namesake.

"It seemed appropriate, when the time came to name DDG 109, that we name that great ship after our newest Medal of Honor recipient," he said. "This is the first time we've had a chance to recognize a Marine from this generation, and particularly a Marine who served so well and sacrificed his life on behalf of our nation in the global war on terror."

The Navy currently has six destroyers named after Marine Medal of Honor recipients. Winter said he expects the USS Jason Dunham to serve the fleet well for many years to come.

"I fully expect that this ship will be in the fleet for 30, 40 years, or maybe even more," he said.

The USS Jason Dunham will be christened in 2009 and commissioned in 2010.

Army Sgt. First Class Paul R. Smith is Operation Iraqi Freedom's only other Medal of Honor recipient so far. He also received the award posthumously.

Was this reported on 60 Minutes (this week 60 minutes interviewed 1600 servicemen who were griping about the war--1600 out of how many that WANT to succeed and win?)? I wouldn't know since I no longer watch any of the main stream drivel.This story is just one of many that America's propaganda machines will not report.

Sphere: Related Content