The Innocence of Jihad: New Movie from Imran Firasat!

Great news for humanity came in the form of a Stand Up America press release today. Imran Firasat in collaboration with two experts, has produced a high quality animated  cartoon which illustrates and explains the Islamic doctrine of Jihad. The movie is scheduled for release July 4, 2012.  The official trailer is embedded below. 

    I find the quality of this trailer to be orders of magnitude above that of the trailer for The Innocent Prophet.  The content is accurate and the presentation is excellent.   The trailer is fast paced, if anything, a little too fast.  I could catch the scripture citations because I am familiar with them.  Keep your mind open and your eyes glued to the screen as you view this trailer.

    A note to the FBI, Department of State, Military Intelligence and Florida's State and local Police Departments:  This blog post contains information which you need to know but are prohibited from obtaining in your formal training due to obsessive & suicidal political correctness.  The Brass may ram it up their ass, so make a note of the url and make another visit from home, on your own computer.  Bold blue, underlined text is hyperlinked to important source documents or other blog posts.  This blog post includes links to the Qur'an, two hadith collections, Tafsir Ibn kathir and three books of Islamic law.

     Superscripts in the text are linked to an enumerated list below the horizontal line. Most of the items in that list contain multiple links. To read them, click the superscripts, then tap your Backspace key to return to your place in the text.

    Muslims are motivated to maim & murder by Allah's imperatives¹, threat² & promise³.  One of those imperatives and the promise are cited in the trailer.

    Imran Firasat asks: "What is Jihad?" Literally, it is striving with great exertion.  The third word in 2:216 is a clue for you: here is the dictionary entry. Jihad is fighting, and it involves killing and being killed.  Jihad an-Nafs: struggling against temptation & ego, does not result in death. 

    Hilali & Khan, in their footnote to 2:190, define Jihad as "....(holy fighting) in Allâh’s Cause (with full force of numbers and weaponry) is given the utmost importance in Islâm and is one of its pillar (on which it stands). By Jihâd Islâm is established, Allâh’s Word is made superior, (His Word being Lâ ilaha illallâh which means none has the right to be worshipped but Allâh), and His Religion (Islâm) is propagated....."

    Islamic law, most clearly codified in The Reliance of the Traveller Book O9.0, informs us that Jihad is "....to war against non-Muslims....".  Is Jihad an outdated anachronism?  Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2526 informs us that it will be "performed continuously" until the last day; 23.3455 tells us that Jihad is the "original religion of Islam" which Allah prefers over agriculture and trade as a means of generating income.

    Is Jihad innocent?  Jihad is mercenary⁴, offensive⁵ and genocidal⁶, far from innocent.  Most Muslims are descended from early victims of Islamic aggression.  They are Muslims because their ancestors were conquered and converted at sword point or impoverished by the levy of Jizya. Many of them are unaware of the doctrines related to Jihad & terrorism.  The threat comes from Believers⁷ who actively seek to obey Allah & emulate Moe.  While they believe Allah's imperatives, threat & promise, they will maim and kill in order to obtain admission to his celestial bordello and avoid his fire.

    Innocence of Jihad is not intended to piss off Muslims, although it will have that effect; it is intended to alert and inform you; to  motivate you to pressure your government for effective action to prevent further attacks and bring about the eventual end of Jihad.   Jihad can only be defeated by destroying their faith: inducing mass apostasy. 

---

1. Fight them until... 8:39, The Order to fight to eradicate Shirk and Kufr
   Fight those who until...9:29, The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah
   Fight those of the disbelievers nearest you...9:123, The Order for Jihad against the Disbelievers, the Closest, then the Farthest Areas
   Imperatives confirmed in ahadith:  Sahih Bukhari 4.52.196, 1.8.387, Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2635.
   Imperatives codified in Islamic Law: The Reliance of the Traveller, Hedaya, Risala.
   
2. Allah will condemn Muslims who shirk Jihad to eternal damnation: 9:38-39, 61:10, Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2497.
3. Allah will admit those who fight in his cause to his celestial bordello. 9:111, 61:10-12..
   Allah promises those who perform acts of terrorism extra credit towards an upgrade in his celestial bordello: 9:120. 
4. How did Moe earn his income? By the tip of his spear! Read the ahadith quoted in the second paragraph of this topic in Tafsir Ibn Kathir.
   How did Allah make Moe wealthy? By conquests!  What was Moe's prime motivating factor? Loot! What did Moe receive from Allah while he was sleeping? The keys to the treasures of the world!  Who gets the spoils? Moe! 8:1, 41
5. There is no hint of defensive motivation in the primary jihad imperatives previously cited. As per the citation to their codification in Reliance of the Traveller, the caliph "makes war upon Jews..." and "fights all other peoples until". The actions depicted in those laws are clearly offensive, not defensive. Kuffar are warred against both defensively and offensively, as laid down in O8.1, "when they are in their own countries". The obligation to attack them occurs annually.  Full clarity is obtained from Hedaya which declares that infidels may be attacked "without provocation" in the link provided in point 1 above. 
6. Moe wanted loot; Allah wanted "great slaughter"; he wanted Muslims to kill and wound "many of them", and Moe did: 33:26-27, Sunan Abu Dawud 38.4390.
7. Begin your quest for information about believers in 8:1-6.  What is the meaning of "go out" and "spend in Allah's cause"?  No, I am not going to tell you! Go to http://www.quranbrowser.com/ and look them up!  You will learn more that way.  9:111 & 49:15 are more explicit and less cryptic.
   

Sphere: Related Content

Treasonous Murder of ST6: Demand Congressional Investigation!

Thanks and a tip of the hat to We The People for embedding this press conference and bringing it to my attention. 

The Gold Star Mother and her colleagues have strength & dignity far beyond me. In their situation, I would be cursing constantly; praying for the immediate and eternal damnation of the traitors responsible for my loss.

    This video is long and it is not easy listening. The stories are heart rending.  I ask you to watch and listen to the whole thing.  I ask you to follow up by contacting your Congressman & Senators  demanding a full investigation leading to impeachment, conviction and removal from office of the AssWhole chiefly responsible.

    After viewing this press conference, share it with everyone you can induce to watch it. We need to make this fact and emotion filled press conference go viral, now, well in advance of the next election cycle. 

    We are fighting a war half-hearted, unwilling to identify the enemy and unwilling to make an effort to win.  The rules of engagement are suicidal, as emphasized by the speakers in the press conference.

    The enemy is Islam. Islam, with no qualifiers: not "extremist", "radical", "Islamist" or "Islamonzi". "Its Islam, Stupid!".  The conflict is existential.  The war will not end until Islam is triumphant or extinct. 

    Islam commands global conquest until only Allah is worshiped, "altogether and everywhere".  Islam commands global conquest until Jews & Christians are subjugated and extorted.

    Islam threatens those who refuse to participate in Jihad with Hellfire.  Islam promises those who fight for Allah admission to his celestial bordello.  Islam declares that our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims; that we have no human rights until we become Muslims.

    The full facts, if widely known, would result in a clamor for the extinction of Islam.  The following list of links to the Qur'an & hadith offers access to the most crucial of those facts.

3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220. 

    We do not need to revolt. We do not need to change our form of government. We need to remove and replace the LibTurds & RINOs who are leading us into Hell.  We must replace them with honest, patriotic Conservatives with enough courage to discover the truth and govern accordingly.  We need to be involved, informed and vigilant. We must inculcate those lessons in future generations so that our error will never be repeated.

Sphere: Related Content

FBI Expert: Qur'an is the revealed word

 Judicial Watch used FOIA to obtain a report on the removal of documents from FBI training curricula. One of those documents yields a quote so stunning that Snooper Report ran it without substantial commentary.  My quest for more information led me through WND and Judicial Watch before I found the original:


http://www.scribd.com/doc/142625630/Tracking-System-No-2-JW1367-1787#page=31

“The Qur’an is not the teachings of the Prophet, but the revealed word of God.”

    How in Hell does that polemic dogma justify removing material from a training course for FBI agents? It is impossible to prove the existence, identity and character of deity.  Those are matters of faith.  The statement was made by a member of the Subject Matter Experts.  Was there any dissent among the experts? How many experts were involved? Who are those experts; what makes them esperts?  At least one of them is a Muslim: one of the enemy.   Did we let the enemy censor our training materials in WWII and the Cold War?  Why not?  What are the potential consequences of such treachersous suuicical idiocy?  Since when does any sentient person allow his enemy to determine for him what factual information about the enemy is relevant and objective?

    Moe said that he was revealing Allah's word.  Nobody else saw or heard Jibril. Nobody shared the revelations.  Moe could and did pull anything out of his ass and attribute it to divine revelation.  His child bride has a clue for you, Morons!

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 311:

Narrated Aisha:
I used to look down upon those ladies who had given themselves to Allah's Apostle and I used to say, "Can a lady give herself (to a man)?" But when Allah revealed: "You (O Muhammad) can postpone (the turn of) whom you will of them (your wives), and you may receive any of them whom you will; and there is no blame on you if you invite one whose turn you have set aside (temporarily).' (33.51) I said (to the Prophet), "I feel that your Lord hastens in fulfilling your wishes and desires."

    Can you obtain a clue?  That hadith proves that part of the Qur'an is situational scripture, invented by Moe to give the imprint of divine sanction to his sexual proclivities.

    A search of the canonical hadith collections for "was revealed" returns 1,276 matching records.  In reviewing them, you will discover how revelations were edited on the fly to suit the needs of the moment. 

    I already showed you evidence that Moe was a false prophet who put words in the idol's mouth to sanctify his lustful apetites. But that ain't all: Moe was insane and suidical.

    Moe supposedly received some of his revelations in the form of "good dreams which came true" Some of them came in the form of "the ringing of a bell, this form of Inspiration is the hardest of all ". Sometimes Jibril talked to him.   Witnesses described Moe losing consciousness, falling to the ground, moving his lips and tongue rapidly and sweating profusely even in cold weather.   It becomes obvious that the parts of the Qur'an not attributable to self-interest can be attributed to hallucinations associated with epilepsy. 

    Would any sane person take orders to wage genocidal warfare from a "prophet" who got them in dreams, bells or voices in his head?  An estimated 270*10⁶ people died early because because a sufficient number of AssWholes did exactly that, motivated by believing the imperatives, threat & promise Moe preached to them.

Sphere: Related Content

CAIR vs. Pompaeo: Both are Wrong

Rep. Mike Pompeo (R. Kan.) spent nearly five minutes calling on Islamic leaders to denounce terrorism.  I first learned of his speech from Bare Naked Islam.  As predicted by BNI, CAIR reacted with a demand for apology. 

• Cair's press release: 
• Cair's letter to Pompeo

    The video clip of the speech is embedded below, followed  by my transcription of the remarks.  I have placed superscripts in the text, linked to a list of comments.  To read a comment, click its superscript. To return to the transcript, use your backspace key. 

Its been just under two months since the attacks in Boston and in those intervening weeks, the silence of Muslim leaders has been deafening.  And that is sad, but perhaps most importantly it's dangerous¹. 

    There have now been at least a dozen attacks by Muslim terrorists on U.S. soil since Ramzi Yousef's parked rental van exploded  in the basement of the World Trade Center on February 26 of 1993.  Some have caused death and injury such as the 9-11 attacks in 2001 and Nidal Hasan's mass shooting at Fort Hood Texas.  Other attacks such as Faisal Shahzad's fizzled Times Square bombing or the unsuccessful underwear bombing of a flight were thwarted or aborted.

    Yet  failed or not, all of these attacks were successful in scaring Americans; successful in reducing our freedom, in the most freedom loving nation on earth. Successful in slowing our economy and successful in demonstrating that a free and open society can potentially be vulnerable.  They were, in the former Attorney General Mike Mukasey's words, crimes² that are none the less meant to send a terrorist message. 

    When the most devastating terrorist attacks on America in the last twenty years come overwhelmingly from people of a single faith³ and are performed in the name of that faith⁴, a special obligation falls on those who are the leaders of that faith.  Instead of responding, silence has made these Islamic leaders across America potentially complicit⁵ in these acts and, more importantly still, those that may well follow. 

    If a religion claims⁶ to be one of peace, Mr. Speaker, it's leaders must reject violence that is perpetrated in its name.  Some clerics today suggest that modern Jihad is non-violent and is only about making oneself a better Muslim.  Perhaps that's true⁷ for moderate Muslims, but  extremists seek to revive the era when most Islamic scholars⁸ understood Jihad to be holy war.

Mr. Speaker, for decades Middle Eastern  oil money have [sic] propounded this more extreme violent interpretation⁹ in mosques around the world.  Less than two months after the 9-11 atrocities an Egyptian Brotherhood preacher who is probably the most influential Sunni cleric today, declared suicide bombing to be legitimate. He said "these are historic heroic commando and martyrdom attacks and should not be called suicide.".

    So, what is it that these Islamic leaders must say?  First, that there is never any justification for terrorism¹⁰.  No political goal legitimizes terrorism¹¹. Terrorism is never excusable as 'resistance'¹².  Imams must say unequivocally¹³  that terrorist actions- killing and maiming [unintelligible- may be: solely is wrong].

     They must also publicly and repeatedly denounce radical¹⁴ clerics who seek to justify terrorism.

     There is a battle of interpretation¹⁵ within Islam, its not enough to deny responsibility saying one's own interpretation doesn't support terrorism. Moderate¹⁶ Imams must strive to ensure that no Muslim finds solace for terrorism¹⁷ in the Qur'an.  They must cite the Qur'an as evidence that the murder of innocents¹⁸ is not permitted  by good believing¹⁹ Muslims and must immediately refute all claims to the contrary. 

    Finally, Muslim leaders must say that there is no room for militant Islamism in the religion of peace²⁰.  These statements must be made frequently, publicly and in the mosques.  Yes, in the mosques and in the madrassahs where many learn their Islamic religion.

    You know we have to call evil by its name in order to stamp it out²¹. Downplaying  atrocities and rampages assures more of them.  Every Muslim leader must unequivocally proclaim  that terror committed in the name of Islam violates the core tenets of the prophet Muhammad²² and they must  do so repeatedly, period. 

    My own faith has occasionally been hijacked in the name of violence and cruelty including in Kansas my home state by Fred Phelps and his Westborough Baptist Church.    In response, hundreds of protestant ministers preached that Mr. Phelps' actions violate the most fundamental Christian traditions and denounced he [sic] and his church's evil acts. Pope John Paul II similarly apologized for the Catholic Church's failure to do more to speak out against the evils of Nazism and  to protect Jews from the Holocaust. 

    Just as these religious leaders have called up those who have acted cruelly and brutally in the name of their faith, so too must Muslim religious leaders refute terrorist theology²³.  

    We are now two decades into Islamic radicals attacking Americans on U.S. soil; I know that not every Muslim supports these actions. Dr. Zuhdi Jasser of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy  has spoken out in a clear and consistent way so has Zainab Al-Suwai of the American Islamic Congress but the  silence in the face of extremism coming from the best funded Islamic advocacy organizations and many mosques across America is absolutely deafening.  It casts doubt upon the commitment to peace by adherents of the Muslim faith. This is utterly unacceptable, it is  dangerous²⁴; it must end. I yield back, Mr. Speaker.

Islamic condemnation of terrorism:

http://kurzman.unc.edu/islamic-statements-against-terrorism/

Mustafa Mashhur, General Guide, Muslim Brotherhood, Egypt; Qazi Hussain Ahmed, Ameer, Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan, Pakistan; Muti Rahman Nizami, Ameer, Jamaat-e-Islami Bangladesh, Bangladesh; Shaykh Ahmad Yassin, Founder, Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas), Palestine; Rashid Ghannoushi, President, Nahda Renaissance Movement, Tunisia; Fazil Nour, President, PAS – Parti Islam SeMalaysia, Malaysia; and 40 other Muslim scholars and politicians:

We condemn, in the strongest terms, the incidents, which are against all human and Islamic norms. This is grounded in the Noble Laws of Islam which forbid all forms of attacks on innocents.

Islamic condemnations of terrorism are the worst sort of malignant malarkey. Islam can  not condemn its own sacraments! I have dealt with this crap before, in detail. Some links to the Qur'an, hadith & tafsir may be broken, but the quotes are still accurate.

• The OIC Remembers the Victims of 9/11 on its 10th Anniversary 09/17/11 The OIC Remembers the Victims of 9/11 on its 10th Anniversary
  
  The OIC did not condemn the Accursed Abomination, it celebrated it, smirking & snickering at your gullibility.  Read between the
  lines and between the words, scratch the surface and delve into Islam’s canon to discover the unpleasant objective factual reality.
  The  OIC’s malignant pretense is reproduced below with superscripts linked to my revelatory evidence and comments. Click any
  superscript to read the comment, then use your Backspace key to return to your place in the septic spew.
• "Condemn in the Strongest Possible Terms” 04/07/11 “We condemn the attack on innocent civilians in southern Israel in the strongest possible terms as well as ongoing rocket fire from Gaza,”  Do you have the fortitude to view a cleaned up version of the strongest possible terms, terms the Traitors won't use? 
• Terrorism Fatwa: Feces  03/04/10  A  Sufi Sheikh living in Britain issued a 88 page summary of a 600 page fatwa supposedly ruling terrorism & suicide bombing harram.  I exposed his malignant malarkey.

---

1. Silence is less dangerous and threatening than false assurances of passivity.  False assertions that Islam is the "religion of peace"  lull some listeners into inattention and apathy. 
   
2. Islamic terrorist attacks are acts of war, not civil criminal offenses. The crime-investigation-trial-punishment model does not fit; the war-victory model is required. Because Muslims are motivated to terrorism by Allah's imperatives, threat & promise, Muslims will never cease from attacking until they become extinct. Extinction is victory; anything less is defeat.
   
3. Muslims engage in terrorism because it is Allah's battle tactic: to so brutalize victims that those "behind them" will "learn a lesson"; so that they will be terrorized and thereby rendered unable to mount an effective resistance.  The use of terms such as "fearsome example" & "strike terror" used in the parallel translations of Surah Al-Anfal 57 will afford a clue to the intelligent reader.
   
4. Islamic terrorism is performed in the name of Allah:  "Allah hu akbar": the takbir which is exclaimed when the attack is commenced, attaches the brand.  They shouted the takbir when they slit the throats of the flight crews; just as they shout it when sacrificing the hadi at the eids.  They sacrificed their victims to Satan. 
   
5. Imams are not complicit in terrorism because they fail to condemn it, they are complicit because they teach, preach and encourage it; they are Muslims--believers. Look up the definition of believers in the Qur'an!  9:111 , 49:15.
   
6. Islam does not mean peace, it means submission.  'You will submit or we will make peace by waging war and exterminate you. '  Imams can not reject anything that is part of the Qur'an or part of Moe's Sunnah. I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers, damn fools one and all, to The Reliance of the Traveller, Book O8.7.  Tell those Islamic leaders to denounce attacks against Jews & Israel and observe their reaction.  What is the difference between the many bus and restaurant bombings in Israel and the Boston bombing? 
      Open the Qur'an to 2:85, and read it repeatedly until you understand it. Are Muslims allowed to pick what they like from that book and reject the rest?  Islam is an all or nothing, bundled package deal; take it or leave it. Study 9:29; what does it command Muslims to do? Does it have geographic limits? Does it have an expiration date? What the Hell does it mean? 
   
   http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//9.20980.html
   http://www.altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=74&tSoraNo= 9&tAyahNo= 29&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0
   http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/008.html#001.008.387
   
   
7. The Qur'an does not define Jihad. Go to Corpus Qur'an and look up the Arabic terms used for it, the third word in 2:216..  Hilali & Khan defined Jihad in a footnote to 2:190.  The legal definition is given in The Reliance of the Traveller O9.0.  Is it Jihad an-Nafs?  Now, Smart Ass, explain to me exactly how a Mujihideen gets killed in Jihad an-Nafs!!!  And, being so God blessed smart, explain in another comment exactly what Moe meant when he said he would love nothing better than multiple martyrdom!!
        What did Jihad mean to Moe? What did he do about it?  Why does each of the six canonical hadith collections have a "Book of Jihad"?
   
8. Islam is static, defined in the immutable Qur'an and exemplified by Moe's Sunnah.  It is and always will be what it was when Moe died.
   
9. There is only one authentic interpretation of the Qur'an: Moe's.  Read his Sunnah!  He said that he was ordered to fight with men. He fought. He dictated extortion letters and dispatched them to neighboring kings by private courier.
   
10. Allah sanctified terrorism.  He said that he would cast terror into the hearts of disbelievers. 3:151, 8:12. He said that he did cast terror: 33:26, 59:2. He commanded Muslims to take actions designed to strike terror into the hearts of disbelievers:  8:57, 8:60.
    
11. Moe's tactical objective was to keep the loot flowing. His strategic objective was global domination; read 8:39 with particular attention to the compound terminal conditions stated therein.  What part of  "altogether and everywhere" or"in the entire world" do you not understand?
    
12. Of course, resistance is their rationalization for terrorism in the reconquest of Israel.  Demanding that their sophistry will accomplish nothing. 
    
13. Moe is considered by Muslims to be the perfect role model, to be emulated by all Muslims, in all places; at all times. Moe was a terrorist, by his own testimony:  Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331, 4.52.220. To see examples of Moe's terrorism, read the oldest extant biography: The Life of Muhammad; page 368, page 523 and page 676.   Rep. Pompeo demanded that Imams renounce Moe's terrorism, which would be, under Shari'ah, a death penalty offense. 
    
14. When applied to Islam and Muslims, terms such as "radical" & "extremist" are superfluous. Normative Islam, as Moe preached and exemplified it, is genocidal, terrorist & imperialist.  Believers are only those who "fight in Allah's cause": 9:111, 49:15.  The rest are hypocrites, whose Islam does not reach beyond their throats.
    
15. Moe interpreted Allah's word with every word he spoke and act he performed. Refer to Sahih Bukhari's books of Jihad, Khumus & Expedition and to Guillaume's  The Life of Muhammad.
    
16. If they are moderate, they ain't Muslims; they are hypocrites, to be killed and gathered together with us into Hell. 
    
17. Yes, of course, so nobody can find these:  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.  What part of "None can change His Words." does the Congressman not comprehend?
    
18. Define innocent!  Extract a definition of innocent from an Imam, Alim or Qadi.  Then plant your foot in his butt because he is a damned liar. Killing believers is expressly forbidden. 5:32 does not mean what you think it does. Muslims will not cite 5:33 because it revels the awful truth: only Muslims are innocent!  Non-believers are not innocent, they are guilty of rebellion: "waging war against Allah and his Messenger". Tafsir Ibn Kathir gives us the definition of "wage war" as an inclusive set, any member of which is sufficient to condemn us. That set includes "disbelief"
         The blood and property of kuffar are not sacred to Muslims and kuffar have no human rights until they become Muslims.  The Jizya is imposed in lieu of destruction and a species of punishment for infidelity. 
    
19. Believing Muslims wage war against us. Refer to the ayat linked in #14.  Imams can not refute objective factual reality.
    
20. "Only Allah has the right to be worshiped". Only Allah and his Messenger have the right to legislate and rule. Non-Islamic governments are tyrannical and must be conquered. The original religion of Islam is Jihad!
    
21. Its name is ISLAM! Islam is intrinsically evil, by design.  Its mission is mercenary and its method is martial. 
    
22. Repetition does not convert a lie into truth, even if it is believed and accepted as truth, it remains a falsehood. 
    
23. Muslim leaders must refute Islam. Yeah, right. 
    
24. Painting over a skunk's stripes or amputating a rattle snake's rattles would be a dangerous act: removing warning signs.  Urging Muslims to misrepresent their war cult as something else is equally irrational and dangerous. 
    

Sphere: Related Content

D Day 2013: Liberate The World this time!

69 years ago, with Nazism controlling much of Europe,  courageous allies converged on the beaches to mount a surprise invasion which began the end of WWII in Europe.  

    With Western Europe and America under increasing and expanding occupation by the enemy forces of Islam, the time has come for a new generation to summon up its courage & greatness and save the world from an older threat widely ignored because it wears the false mantle of religion.  

    Like the Vichy French, Obamination and treacherous European leaders  co-operate with the invaders to subvert our sovereignty and subject us to slavery. We have no army, air force or navy; we have only our voices and keyboards; our fight is vocal and verbal: informing our countrymen of the fact that we are under siege.  Unlike our treacherous leaders, we correctly identify and characterize our enemy: normative Islam.  Not some imaginary distorted, perverted or hijacked extremism, but the real thing as preached & practiced by its founder: Muhammad 1400 years ago. 

    The modern Vichy are waging a vigorous campaign of denunciation and deceit; they seek to squelch our feeble warnings of clear & present danger. They announce that "Islam is a great religion of peace" with no connection to terrorism.  They tell us that the Boston Marathon Bombing was not an act of terrorism because it was not commissioned by Al-Qaeda.

    They tell us that our exposure of Islamic doctrine & practice is "inflammatory", that it incites violence, violating the 'civil rights'  of  Muslims and subjecting us to criminal liability. 

    Nothing can be accomplished by individual acts of vigilantism, and those of who are reasonable do not advocate it.  We neither incite, suggest nor imply a need or desire for assaults on Muslims or vandalism against their property.  A few of us who do not make our livings by lecture fees & book royalties  openly demand effective government action to remove the fifth columns from our shores and exclude its members from entering.  We call for recognition of the fact that Islam is the enemy, not a legitimate religion and must be eradicated to make peace & security possible in the modern world.

    In our legal system. truth is a defense against charges of slander.  In Shari'ah, it is not. 

r2.2 Slander (ghiba) means to mention anything
concerning a person that he would dislike,
whether about his body,. religion, everyday life,
self, disposition, property, son, father, wife, servant,
turban, garment, gait, movements, smiling,
dissoluteness, frowning, cheerfulness, or anything
else connected with him.
[The Reliance of the Traveller, pg.  730.]

    In Shari'ah, a conquered Christian forfeits his life for reviling Allah, Moe and or Islam.  But in America, we have a First Amendment which protects us when we speak and write the truth. 

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Are anonymous, unelected bureaucrats empowered to do that which is prohibited to Congress: to abridge the right of free speech & press and the right to petition for redress of grievances?  The answer is obvious on the face of the text. The Department of Justice is not allowed to impose injustice u0on us in the form of Shari'ah.

    Am I a hypocrite for petitioning the government to outlaw Islam and  expel & exclude its adherents?  No! Islam is a continuing criminal enterprise; a war against humanity, not a legitimate religion.  You assume that Islam is a religion because it is couched in religious terms and claims divine sanction for its depredations.  You assume that, because 'it is a religion' it must be anodyne & beneficent; it ain't. Islam's mission is mercenary and its method is martial. 

    Moe was a profiteer, not a Prophet of God.  He heard sounds and saw lights; he feared that he was going mad.  Perceiving that he wrestled the devil, he contemplated suicide.   He 'revealed' situational scripture casting divine sanction about his sexual proclivities. He imputed to Allah words that came from Satan. 

    Moe was motivated by lust for loot; Allah is motivated by blood lust. These fatal facts are disclosed in the Qur'an's Surah Al-Anfal 8:67.A Prophet is not permitted to hold prisoners for ransom until he has made a great slaughter.  Does it really mean that? See for yourself, broken down word by word. Consult Tafsir Ibn Kathir, too.  Did Moe really do that? To the Banu Qurayza? Is it in the Qur'an?

    Moe said that he was raised for Jihad, not for tillage.     He said that he got his income by his spear, disgracing and humiliating his opponents and that he was sent with a sword to see that only Allah is worshiped. 

    Moe dictated extortion letters to his scribes and dispatched them to rulers in the region by private courier.  Would a genuine Prophet of God send extortion letters?

    Of course, American Muslims have nothing to do with terrorism, perish the thought.  But one of the Boston Bombers is a naturalized citizen; he has admitted that he participated in terrorism motivated by Islamic doctrine. The sad facts:

1. terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam
2. Moe practiced and bragged about it
3. Allah said that he would and did cast terror
4. Allah commanded Muslims to engage in it
5. Allah promised great reward for performing it.

Here is the evidence: from the Qur'an & hadith.   3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220. 

    Of course Muslims neither believe nor practice that. So they are going to Hell! Surah Al Baqarah 2:85 declares Islam to be an all or nothing, package deal with no selectivity allowed. 9:38-39, linked in the paragraph above, threaten Muslims with Hellfire if they do not participate in Jihad.  A Muslim who neither goes to war nor supports it financially meets with a sudden calamity. Get a clue for Chrissake!

    Let us therefore resolve that this day: June 6, 2013 will be the first day of a renewed Crusade to remove Islam from our shores entirely and eventually make the world an Islam free zone.  Click the links in this blog post; read the relevant factual evidence, evaluate it and propagate it.  Let no eye remain blind nor ear deaf to the fatal facts which condemn Islam.

Sphere: Related Content