Keep the media OUT of Dover!

YOUR mission. TODAY.

Seems that this new American administration is really into this whole "change" thing. I am sure most of you are aware that when our fallen heroes are brought home, they come through Dover. President George W Bush barred the media from documenting their arrival, to allow the families private moments with their precious loved ones.

Now President Obama is reviewing this policy. Other blogs have voiced their opposition to this far more eloquently than I. MY opposition is that this msm has proved that they have NO respect for the fallen or their families. Even as they bleat that showing the fallen heroes returning would show the "true cost of war," they completely ignore the many, MANY other stories that show the 'real' war. Rarely do we see stories in the msm showing the realities, the progress of what our military is accomplishing. Having said that, I do not trust the msm to be respectful of our newly grieving Gold Star Families.

I could go on and on, but - as always - our military families say it far better. One such Gold Star father is Robert Stokely. Father of Sgt. Mike Stokely, Mr Stokely stands on guard for the respect and honour for our fallen. He sent an email and I am going to post it in its entirety. Once you have read it, you will know what to do. Please, do this for Mike, Patrick, Kory, Don, John, Josh and for Sean. Our fallen, and their families, have more than earned this small gesture of respect:

Please read and help Keep the Media out of Dover when our Fallen arrive home

Senator John Kerry / Democrat of Massachusetts and Senator Frank R. Lautenberg, and if you take the statements of then Senator Biden (who stated the soldiers are snuck in under cover of darkness), want Dover to be open to media coverage of arriving and departing flag draped caskets of our fallen and their unashamed purpose is to "show the real cost of war...". During his speech on the economic crisis on Monday, Feb. 9, 2009, President Obama, in answering the question of Ed Henry of CNN, stated he was ordering a review of the policy. The links below cover the interview with Secretary of Defense Robert Gates wherein he alarmingly states he is open to the policy being changes, stating it might show "more honor" for the fallen.


http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/O/OBAMA_COFFINS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/11/us/11bodies.html?_r=2&hp


I take the stand that Dover is too special a place for our fallen to be made a spectacle of for many reasons, but I will offer these as the most important:


1. Just as the families should be the first to get the "call" that their loved one has died, so should the first non-military required handling and view of the fallen be their's to have rather than having it splashed about in the media for a political statement of "showing the real cost of war."


2. Our military personnel do not decide when, where or how long war is waged; such decisions are for political leaders to make and constitutional duty of any military personnel is to carry out the lawful orders of the Commander in Chief / President. Thus, the only purpose of the media and the above stated politicians desire to "show the real cost of war" is for a political purpose. Just for settling the debate, the real cost of war is already known for it is a little hard to hide the impact of a fallen has on his / her family, community and entire country and they are not snuck back in under cover of darkness to hide their loss, but if any use of cover of darkness is had, it is to shield them from being used as a political photo op.


I urge your action to contact your U.S. Senator and U.S. Congressman to have them exercise their contacts and leverage to keep Dover a private place for the fallen and the families who are about to receive them home for burial. And it is important to contact President Obama, Defense Secretary Gates, and others on the list below. I know it is a long list, but think about the time you spend in writing a letter, sending a fax, sending an email, or making a call versus the lifetime of love the fallen and their families have given for America.


The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Phone Numbers
Comments: 202-456-1111
Switchboard: 202-456-1414
FAX: 202-456-2461

TTY/TDD
Comments: 202-456-6213
Visitors Office: 202-456-2121

SCTY Defense Robert Gates:

Dr. Robert M. Gates
Secretary of Defense
1000 Defense Pentagon
Washington, DC 20301-1000

Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Michael Mullen:

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
9999 Joint Staff Pentagon
Washington, DC 20318-9999

General James E. Cartwright:

Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
9999 Joint Staff Pentagon
Washington, DC 20318-9999

General George W. Casey, Jr.:

Army Chief of Staff
200 Army Pentagon
Washington, DC 20310-0200

Admiral Gary Roughead:

Chief of Naval Operations
2000 Navy Pentagon
Washington, DC 20350-2000

General Norton A. Schwartz:

Air Force Chief of Staff
1670 Air Force Pentagon
Washington, DC 20330-1670

General James T. Conway:

Commandant of the Marine Corps
Headquarters USMC
2 Navy Annex (CMC)
Washington, DC 20380-1775

Senator John Kerry:

http://kerry.senate.gov/contact/email.cfm

218 Russell Bldg.
Second Floor
Washington D.C. 20510
202-224-2742 - Phone
202-224-8525 - Fax

Boston
One Bowdoin Square
Tenth Floor
Boston, MA 02114
617-565-8519 - Phone
617-248-3870 - Fax

Springfield
Springfield Federal Building
1550 Main Street
Suite 304
Springfield, MA 01101
413-785-4610 - Phone
413-736-1049 - Fax

Fall River
222 Milliken Place
Suite 312
Fall River, Ma 02721
508-677-0522 - Phone
508-677-0275 - Fax

Senator Frank R. Lautenberg:

http://lautenberg.senate.gov/contact/index1.cfm

Newark Office
One Gateway Center
Twenty-Third Floor
Newark, NJ 07102
Phone: 973-639-8700
Toll Free: 1-888-398-1642
Fax: 973-639-8723

Camden Office
One Port Center
Suite 505, Fifth Floor
2 Riverside Drive
Camden, NJ 08101
Phone: 856-338-8922
Fax: 856-338-8936

Washington, DC
Hart Senate Office Building
Suite 324
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: 202-224-3224
TTY: 202-224-2087
Fax: 202-228-4054

thanks,

Robert Stokely
proud dad SGT Mike Stokely
KIA 16 AUG 05 near Yusufiyah Iraq
USA E 108 CAV 48th BCT GAARNG

THIS is the very least we can do. Get on it.

Sphere: Related Content

Wilders' Wisdom

Pretend that Justice was done, and Geert Wilders was admitted to England and allowed to give the remarks he had prepared. Place yourself in the role of a fly on the wall observing the proceedings. From my friend Roger Gardner comes this transcript of the remarks as prepared. Read them and weep for the ashes of a once great empire where the spark of Liberty first ignited to limit autocratic power. Will we preserve and kindle that spark or will we allow a stream of camel piss to extinguish it forever?

Monday, February 16, 2009

What Wilders would have said if the UK allowed free speech

From IFPS
h/t to Stormin Norman Hooben

The House of Lords Speech: What Wilders Would Have Said If the UK Allowed Free Speech
February 13, 2009

Editor’s note: Below is the text of the address that Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilders was invited to deliver at the House of Lords on Thursday, February 12, 2009. Instead of making this address and showing his film Fitna, he was detained by UK immigration officials on his arrival at London Heathrow airport and sent back to the Netherlands as a risk to “public security.”

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you very much.
Thank you for inviting me. Thank you Lord Pearson and Lady Cox for showing Fitna, and for your gracious invitation. While others look away, you seem to understand the true tradition of your country, and a flag that still stands for freedom.

This is no ordinary place. This is not just one of England’s tourist attractions. This is a sacred place. This is the mother of all Parliaments, and I am deeply humbled to speak before you.
The Houses of Parliament is where Winston Churchill stood firm, and warned – all throughout the 1930’s – for the dangers looming. Most of the time he stood alone.

In 1982 President Reagan came to the House of Commons, where he did a speech very few people liked. Reagan called upon the West to reject communism and defend freedom. He introduced a phrase: ‘evil empire’. Reagan’s speech stands out as a clarion call to preserve our liberties. I quote: If history teaches anything, it teaches self-delusion in the face of unpleasant facts is folly.
What Reagan meant is that you cannot run away from history, you cannot escape the dangers of ideologies that are out to destroy you. Denial is no option.

Communism was indeed left on the ash heap of history, just as Reagan predicted in his speech in the House of Commons. He lived to see the Berlin Wall coming down, just as Churchill witnessed the implosion of national-socialism.

Today, I come before you to warn of another great threat. It is called Islam. It poses as a religion, but its goals are very worldly: world domination, holy war, sharia law, the end of the separation of church and state, the end of democracy. It is not a religion, it is a political ideology. It demands you respect, but has no respect for you.

There might be moderate Muslims, but there is no moderate Islam. Islam will never change, because it is build on two rocks that are forever, two fundamental beliefs that will never change, and will never go away. First, there is Quran, Allah’s personal word, uncreated, forever, with orders that need to be fulfilled regardless of place or time. And second, there is al-insal al-kamil, the perfect man, Muhammad the role model, whose deeds are to be imitated by all Muslims. And since Muhammad was a warlord and a conqueror we know what to expect.

Islam means submission, so there cannot be any mistake about it’s goal. That’s a given. The question is whether the British people, with its glorious past, is longing for that submission.
We see Islam taking off in the West at an incredible speed. The United Kingdom has seen a rapid growth of the number of Muslims. Over the last ten years, the Muslim population has grown ten times as fast as the rest of society. This has put an enormous pressure on society. Thanks to British politicians who have forgotten about Winston Churchill, the English now have taken the path of least resistance. They give up. They give in.

Thank you very much for letting me into the country. I received a letter from the Secretary of State for the Home Department, kindly disinviting me. I would threaten community relations, and therefore public security in the UK, the letter stated.

For a moment I feared that I would be refused entrance. But I was confident the British government would never sacrifice free speech because of fear of Islam. Britannia rules the waves, and Islam will never rule Britain, so I was confident the Border Agency would let me through. And after all, you have invited stranger creatures than me. Two years ago the House of Commons welcomed Mahmoud Suliman Ahmed Abu Rideh, linked to Al Qaeda. He was invited to Westminster by Lord Ahmed, who met him at Regent’s Park mosque three weeks before. Mr. Rideh, suspected of being a money man for terror groups, was given a SECURITY sticker for his Parliamentary visit.
Well, if you let in this man, than an elected politician from a fellow EU country surely is welcome here too. By letting me speak today you show that Mr Churchill’s spirit is still very much alive. And you prove that the European Union truly is working; the free movement of persons is still one of the pillars of the European project.

But there is still much work to be done. Britain seems to have become a country ruled by fear. A country where civil servants cancel Christmas celebrations to please Muslims. A country where Sharia Courts are part of the legal system. A country where Islamic organizations asked to stop the commemoration of the Holocaust. A country where a primary school cancels a Christmas nativity play because it interfered with an Islamic festival. A country where a school removes the words Christmas and Easter from their calendar so as not to offend Muslims. A country where a teacher punishes two students for refusing to pray to Allah as part of their religious education class. A country where elected members of a town council are told not to eat during daylight hours in town hall meetings during the Ramadan. A country that excels in its hatred of Israel, still the only democracy in the Middle-East. A country whose capitol is becoming ‘Londonistan.’

I would not qualify myself as a free man. Four and a half years ago I lost my freedom. I am under guard permanently, courtesy to those who prefer violence to debate. But for the leftist fan club of Islam, that is not enough. They started a legal procedure against me. Three weeks ago the Amsterdam Court of Appeals ordered my criminal prosecution for making Fitna and for my views on Islam. I committed what George Orwell called a ‘thought crime.’

You might have seen my name on Fitna’s credit role, but I am not really responsible for that movie. It was made for me. It was actually produced by Muslim extremists, the Quran and Islam itself. If Fitna is considered ‘hate speech,’ then how would the Court qualify the Quran, with all it’s calls for violence, and hatred against women and Jews?

Mr. Churchill himself compared the Quran to Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf. Well, I did exactly the same, and that is what they are prosecuting me for.
I wonder if the UK ever put Mr. Churchill on trail.

The Court’s decision and the letter I received form the Secretary of State for the Home Department are two major victories for all those who detest freedom of speech. They are doing Islam’s dirty work. Sharia by proxy. The differences between Saudi Arabia and Jordan on one hand, and Holland and Britain are blurring. Europe is now on the fast track of becoming Eurabia. That is apparently the price we have to pay for the project of mass immigration, and the multicultural project.

Ladies and gentlemen, the dearest of our many freedoms is under attack. In Europe, freedom of speech is no longer a given. What we once considered a natural component of our existence is now something we again have to fight for. That is what is at stake. Whether or not I end up in jail is not the most pressing issue. The question is: Will free speech be put behind bars?
We have to defend freedom of speech.

For the generation of my parents the word ‘London’ is synonymous with hope and freedom. When my country was occupied by the national-socialists the BBC offered a daily glimpse of hope, in the darkness of Nazi tyranny. Millions of my country men listened to it, illegally. The words ‘This Is London’ were a symbol for a better world coming soon. If only the British and Canadian and American soldiers were here.

What will be transmitted forty years from now? Will it still be ‘This Is London’? Or will it be ‘this is Londonistan’? Will it bring us hope, or will it signal the values of Mecca and Medina? Will Britain offer submission or perseverance? Freedom or slavery?
The choice is ours.

Ladies and gentlemen,
We will never apologize for being free. We will never give in. We will never surrender.
Freedom must prevail, and freedom will prevail.
Thank you very much.

Geert Wilders MP
Chairman, Party for Freedom (PVV)
The Netherlands

Posted by Roger W. Gardner at 4:43 AM

Sphere: Related Content

Lorenzo's Flier

In a previous post, Cultural Difference: Jihad Imperatives, I dissected a Victoria News editorial. Since publishing that post, I have received the text of two of Lorenzo Bouchard's fliers which were posted at U of V. These documents do not contain any express or implied threat or intimidation. Lorenzo also posted a cartoon which depicts an Israeli soldier protecting a baby carriage while a Hamas terrorist shoots from behind a baby carriage. He also displayed an ADL poster: "Why is Israel Fighting Back", which I was unable to find.

Here is the full text of one of Lorenzo Bouchard's postings. He informs me that it has been sent to many government oficials. It has also been posted widely on the web. You can read it in a blog comment here: http://islamicterrorism.wordpress.com/2008/08/12/is-banning-islam-the-way-to-go/ That text contains active hyerlinks to Lorenzo's petitions and web site.

As I anticipated, this text contains no threat nor intimidation, either explicit or implied. It contains facts which can be verified by reading Bukhari's authentic hadith collection. It is obvious that the Victoria News was spinning a gossamer fabric of innuendo from horse feathers & moon beams, without real substance.

The Right Honourable Member

Hello;

MOHAMMEDS WORDS CREATED MUMBAI'S MASSACRE !

The following item shows that Islamic Terrorists are following Mohammeds example and decrees. Tolerance comprise only 3% of Mohammeds statements. They were in his early period in Mecca. After his escape to Medina, 97% of the statements relating to unbelievers, were hate and violence decreed against all infidels. The first 3% are abrogated by later decrees. Anyone who is learned in the Muslim faith who states that Islam is a religion of Peace, is a 5th columnist doing his duty for Islam, to undermine and lull our Democracies.

Muslims consider Mohammed the most honourable of all men. This allows them every act that he did or supported.

For the security of Democracies, please read the following item.

Ban Islam for past and present War Crimes

Muhammed: The Con Man and False Prophet

As we are against terrorism in the world for the ultimate survival of our society, I’m offering viewpoints to win the battle against Islam’s goal of world domination, which is stated in their writings.

Muhammed and his sayings, found in the Koran, Hadiths, Sunnahs and Surahs, are the root of Muslim terrorism.

With truth and reality, we must discredit the founder of Islam, his sayings and the belief system that spawns this terrorism.

Let the world know that Muhammed, while in Medina, organized raids on camel trains hauling trade goods, and received twenty percent (20%) of the ill gotten loot. The spiritual mechanics of functioning as a Prophet does not mix with being a thief and killing for wealth.

Let the world know that Muhammed betrothed a six year old (6) child , in her ninth year (9) consummated their marriage sexually. He was in his fifties (50’s) at the time. The inner development of a Prophet does not function with paedophilia. Muhammed was a Paedophile. He claimed that Aisha was his only wife that caused him to experience revelations while under the blanket with her. Muhammeds counsel to others and actions, legitimized paedophilia through Islams ideology. What was the source of Muhammeds revelations as a Paedophile? All this is stated in th Hadiths and Surahs.

On returning to Medina after taking Mecca, he attacked one of the Jewish tribes, the Qurraysa. After 28 days of siege, the Jews capitulated. Muhammed immediately ignored the terms agreed upon as part of their surrender. He ordered and watched as all males from puberty on were beheaded in a trench. Their families were made to watch this slaughter of the male children and men. Some of the women became hysterical while watching the beheading of their husbands and sons and were also beheaded. During the slaughter, Muhammed spotted a beautiful Jewish girl and selected her for his sex slave. Her name was Rayhannah. She had to watch while her mother and sister were raped. Her sister was traded as a slave for arms which is stated in both the Hadiths and the Surahs. There were three tribal groups of Jewish origin and belief in Medina at that time. Those that weren’t killed or sold into slavery were forced out into the desert to die.

These atrocities are the actions of a demonic fiend not a Prophet.

Muhammed also encouraged and rewarded many assassinations in his lifetime. Murder is not an activity of a Prophet.

The fantasy paradise that Muhammed developed to entice the itinerant, uneducated Arabs to Islam is a personal bordello. This paradise in the hereafter shows a sexual fixation and addiction in the spirit of Muhammed. This is not the development of a spiritual Prophet. This demonic personality is no doubt the most successful con man ever. Muhammed has been more successful than Hitler and the Nazi movement in longevity, size of his organization and hatred of the Jews.

Compare Muhammed to all former Prophets and founders of great religious movements, East and West, and it easily shows us how debased he was. His organization was developed by tacking spiritual words to robbery, killing, conversions by the sword and terrorism with Fatwas which are all fiendish acts. This activity by his followers is presently seen on television clips with kidnapped, innocent people being beheaded in praise of Allah.

Last but not least, Allah was one of over two hundred and fifty (250) idols in the Ka’aba. After taking Mecca, Muhammed destroyed all other tribal idols except for the Quraysh tribe’s idol and pronounced Allah the one and only God.

I believe that, in warfare against terrorism, we must attack the heart and not just the tentacles of Islam with truth. We must not let this perversion of religion spawn numberless adherents to Muhammed’s words to expand their terrorism. We must confront terrorism head on.

When combating Evil remember: Appeasement is like feeding a steak to a tiger in the hope that it will eventually become a vegetarian.

International Ban Islam petition:

http://www.petitiononline.com/MYSTIC/petition.html

Canada’s for debate in the House of Commons:

http://www.petitiononline.com/GUARDIAN/

Guardians of Democracy site:

http://mypage.direct.ca/l/lbouchar/

Unfortunately, Muslims in debate or negotiations are forced to LIE to preserve Islam’s integrity. This noble Islamic activity is called “TAKIYA”.

Sincerely,

Lorenzo Bouchard

Sphere: Related Content

Lorenzo's Other Flier

In a previous post, Cultural Difference: Jihad Imperatives, I dissected a Victoria News editorial. Since publishing that post, I have received the text of two of Lorenzo Bouchard's fliers which were posted at U of V. These documents do not contain any express or implied threat or intimidation. Lorenzo also posted a cartoon which depicts an Israeli soldier protecting a baby carriage while a Hamas terrorist shoots from behind a baby carriage. He also displayed an ADL poster: "Why is Israel Fighting Back", which I was unable to find.

Here is the full text of one of Lorenzo Bouchard's postings. He informs me that it has been sent to many government oficials. It has also been posted widely on the web. You can read it in a blog comment here: http://islamicterrorism.wordpress.com/2008/08/12/is-banning-islam-the-way-to-go/ That text contains active hyerlinks to Lorenzo's petitions and web site.

As I anticipated, this text contains no threat nor intimidation, either explicit or implied. It contains facts which can be verified by reading Bukhari's authentic hadith collection. It is obvious that the Victoria News was spinning a gossamer fabric of innuendo from horse feathers & moon beams, without real substance.

The Right Honourable Member

Hello;

MOHAMMEDS WORDS CREATED MUMBAI'S MASSACRE !

The following item shows that Islamic Terrorists are following Mohammeds example and decrees. Tolerance comprise only 3% of Mohammeds statements. They were in his early period in Mecca. After his escape to Medina, 97% of the statements relating to unbelievers, were hate and violence decreed against all infidels. The first 3% are abrogated by later decrees. Anyone who is learned in the Muslim faith who states that Islam is a religion of Peace, is a 5th columnist doing his duty for Islam, to undermine and lull our Democracies.

Muslims consider Mohammed the most honourable of all men. This allows them every act that he did or supported.

For the security of Democracies, please read the following item.

Ban Islam for past and present War Crimes

Muhammed: The Con Man and False Prophet

As we are against terrorism in the world for the ultimate survival of our society, I’m offering viewpoints to win the battle against Islam’s goal of world domination, which is stated in their writings.

Muhammed and his sayings, found in the Koran, Hadiths, Sunnahs and Surahs, are the root of Muslim terrorism.

With truth and reality, we must discredit the founder of Islam, his sayings and the belief system that spawns this terrorism.

Let the world know that Muhammed, while in Medina, organized raids on camel trains hauling trade goods, and received twenty percent (20%) of the ill gotten loot. The spiritual mechanics of functioning as a Prophet does not mix with being a thief and killing for wealth.

Let the world know that Muhammed betrothed a six year old (6) child , in her ninth year (9) consummated their marriage sexually. He was in his fifties (50’s) at the time. The inner development of a Prophet does not function with paedophilia. Muhammed was a Paedophile. He claimed that Aisha was his only wife that caused him to experience revelations while under the blanket with her. Muhammeds counsel to others and actions, legitimized paedophilia through Islams ideology. What was the source of Muhammeds revelations as a Paedophile? All this is stated in th Hadiths and Surahs.

On returning to Medina after taking Mecca, he attacked one of the Jewish tribes, the Qurraysa. After 28 days of siege, the Jews capitulated. Muhammed immediately ignored the terms agreed upon as part of their surrender. He ordered and watched as all males from puberty on were beheaded in a trench. Their families were made to watch this slaughter of the male children and men. Some of the women became hysterical while watching the beheading of their husbands and sons and were also beheaded. During the slaughter, Muhammed spotted a beautiful Jewish girl and selected her for his sex slave. Her name was Rayhannah. She had to watch while her mother and sister were raped. Her sister was traded as a slave for arms which is stated in both the Hadiths and the Surahs. There were three tribal groups of Jewish origin and belief in Medina at that time. Those that weren’t killed or sold into slavery were forced out into the desert to die.

These atrocities are the actions of a demonic fiend not a Prophet.

Muhammed also encouraged and rewarded many assassinations in his lifetime. Murder is not an activity of a Prophet.

The fantasy paradise that Muhammed developed to entice the itinerant, uneducated Arabs to Islam is a personal bordello. This paradise in the hereafter shows a sexual fixation and addiction in the spirit of Muhammed. This is not the development of a spiritual Prophet. This demonic personality is no doubt the most successful con man ever. Muhammed has been more successful than Hitler and the Nazi movement in longevity, size of his organization and hatred of the Jews.

Compare Muhammed to all former Prophets and founders of great religious movements, East and West, and it easily shows us how debased he was. His organization was developed by tacking spiritual words to robbery, killing, conversions by the sword and terrorism with Fatwas which are all fiendish acts. This activity by his followers is presently seen on television clips with kidnapped, innocent people being beheaded in praise of Allah.

Last but not least, Allah was one of over two hundred and fifty (250) idols in the Ka’aba. After taking Mecca, Muhammed destroyed all other tribal idols except for the Quraysh tribe’s idol and pronounced Allah the one and only God.

I believe that, in warfare against terrorism, we must attack the heart and not just the tentacles of Islam with truth. We must not let this perversion of religion spawn numberless adherents to Muhammed’s words to expand their terrorism. We must confront terrorism head on.

When combating Evil remember: Appeasement is like feeding a steak to a tiger in the hope that it will eventually become a vegetarian.

International Ban Islam petition:

http://www.petitiononline.com/MYSTIC/petition.html

Canada’s for debate in the House of Commons:

http://www.petitiononline.com/GUARDIAN/

Guardians of Democracy site:

http://mypage.direct.ca/l/lbouchar/

Unfortunately, Muslims in debate or negotiations are forced to LIE to preserve Islam’s integrity. This noble Islamic activity is called “TAKIYA”.

Sincerely,

Lorenzo Bouchard

Sphere: Related Content

Lorenzo's Letter

The Right Honorable Prime Minister
Stephen Harper,

Hello;

Just to inform your office, of the disinformation that our leftist controlled media is using, concerning the Ban Islam petition.

The following is my letter of rebutal to their activity, sent to the Victoria News editor and others.

Mr. Kevin Laird:

I am saddened to see the level of disinformation that your newspaper has been involved in.

The article written by Roszan Holmen titled "Student group tackles "Islamophobia on"Campus", dated Wednesday, February 11, 2008.
The term "Islamophobia" denotes a mental illness", this type of statements is used by manipulators of the left, to discredit individuals who stand on issues against Islam. (Typical 1984 concept.)

More items of disinformation, is that no one knew I was involved in these posters. The fact is that the petition was delivered to your front desk to go to a reporter weeks ago. My name was clearly written on it.
This undermines Ms. Roszan Holmen's detective achievement, which describes that she found this through a search on the internet.

As for no one knowing that I was involved with this activity at U.Vic., this is another false statement, as I have given my writtings and petition, to the Guards, who walk or drive me of the premises, for months.

It is a fact that I don't contact "Closet Communists" for permission, who control the boards notices, before posting these items.

Incidentally, I also love to feed the rabbits, which is also considered a violation at U.Vic..

As you know I was barred from U.Vic years ago by a Left Wing Tribunal,who had the support of a temporary Dean, replacing the previous one who stated my activities were legal.

B.C. Civil Liberty condemned U.Vic on this action.

Of course U.Vic. ignores all such activity if it doesnt conform to Leftist indoctrination.

This is a huge topic for further articles.

Again I do not respect the decisions of Closet Communists.

I stopped resisting my ouster, though at first I waited for the city police to take me out, because most guards are pleasant and doing their job. We have pleasant interesting discussions on their effort.
Since the article has mentioned my being banned, I will remind you that the issue at that time was the demand of "Referenda on Aboriginal Treaties". These are Democratic processes, in essence I'm banned for standing for a Democracy, with Canadian citizens full involvement.

I was previously active for 14 years on developing Initiatives, Referenda and Recall in B.C. and Canada.

I understand that the Closet Communist at CBC have been active with a morning show about the Ban Islam petition easily found on Google with my name attached.

On the third day of their programming I deliverd one of the petitions to the local CBC station, the recipient thought I was from the University and thanked me, because they hadn't seen the petition yet.

I haven't yet heard the comments activated by CBC.

The petition is for presentation to the World Court for Humanitarian rulings against the writings in the Koran , Hadiths, Sunnas, which have a great deal of hate focused on all none believers.


Most editors are hiding under their desks, on printing any comments about Islam. Fear and intimidation through Lawsuits or terrorism, only strengthens my resolve in trying to develope Canadians backbones, to preserve our societies Ethos and hard fought Freedoms, through this issue.

In the past months this petition has been sent to most Federally and B.C. elected Officials in Canada, Senators and Representatives of the U.S.A., Members of Sweden and Australias parliaments, some English members and other European members.

"Politically Correct" activity! I don't cater to this Communist Mind manipulation and control.

The Left doesn't know the meaning of PC when slandering and debasing opposition.

Do you have the internal fortitude to print this?

This will also go to the central office of Black Press in Canada.

Sincerely,

Lorenzo Bouchard
labouchard@shaw.ca

Sphere: Related Content